Best Essays
With the technological knowledge in the world growing from day to day, there is no way to predict where science may lead us in the future. Just a few years ago, cloning was something of a fictional nature that most scientists had thought about, but never seriously considered it as an experiment. Recently, animals have been cloned, and cloning has become no less than true reality. In a few more years, the knowledge on how to clone humans could be present. Before that advancement arrives, we need to ask ourselves if this knowledge of cloning is a beneficial idea or a destructive one. Cloning will have negative effects on our society in the future because: cloning devalues uniqueness of the individual cloned, clones could be used in crimes or used as weapons, cloned animals that are reintroduced into the ecosystem could cause the ecosystem to change drastically, people who try to clone their dead loved ones will be shocked to find that the clone may resemble the person that they love, but it really isn't the person that they love, finally, animals that are cloned for medical reasons don't deserve to be brought into this world just to be used only for their organs and other body parts. If something isn't done to avoid cloning humans before it is too late, then cloning could upset the balance of our society drastically, possibly causing irreversible mishap in the world as we know it today.
The knowledge on how to clone humans doesn't exist yet, but the knowledge on how to clone animals is presently being utilized in research labs worldwide. Standard cloning involves taking DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) from a cell of a particular species and transferring it into an egg cell from another animal belonging to the same species or another one. Before this process can take place, the nucleus from the original cell must be removed from that egg. The result is then implanted into the surrogate mother. This mother will then provide the food and nutrients for the embryo to develop until the mother gives birth to the clone. Until recently, the surrogate mother had to be of the same species, but now, with recent technological advances, one species can now give birth to a different species ("Science and Technology" 100).
The laundry list of complaints about cloning begins with the fact that cloning humans decreases the value of uniqueness of the individual. Accordi...

... middle of paper ..." CeresNet 2000.5 Nov. 2000 Colvin, Jonathon. "Me, my clone, and I (or in defense of human cloning)." The Humanist May/Jun. 2000: 39.
Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Don't Clone – 3 Reasons. 31 Oct. 2000 Lemonick, Michael D. "Could a clone ever run for President?" Time 8 Nov. 1999: 96.
Mayor, Susan. "UK authorities recommend human cloning for therapeutic research." British Medical Journal 98: 1613.
Myers, Nichole. Personal Interview. 1 April. 2001.
Pavone, Fr. Frank. "What does it mean to be Me?" 31 Oct. 2000 Rembert, Tracey C. "Me and my shadow." E Jul/Aug. 1997: 15–21.
Schaeffer, Pamela. "Many oppose human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999: 19,21.
"Science and technology: New kid on the block." The Economist 14 Oct. 2000: 100.
"Vatican: No to human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999: 21.
Watson, Rory. "European parliament wants world ban on human cloning." British Medical Journal 97: 847
Get Access