Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abnormal psychology in films
Psychological aspects of movies
Psychopaths and mental disorders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abnormal psychology in films
Alex from Clockwork Orange tried to rape a woman l Unpredictable and emotionally unstable
Most of the psychopaths are also depicted as unpredictable and emotionally unstable.
Nobody can tell when he is going to kill, lie, rape, or laugh. Sometimes, it becomes even difficult to tell when they are likely to commit suicide. To many psychopaths, being unpredictable is a source of power. It also helped them to enhance their manipulative skills. For example, they can tell a lie and make sure that people believe it but actually they are planning something different.
This prevents people from stopping them on their tracks because they only find out after a crime has been committed. According to Robert Genter, the artistic use of suspense makes a movie
…show more content…
l No sense of nervousness or psychoneurotic manifestations
According to doctor Harvey M. Cleckley, what makes psychopaths unique in most cases is their little or no sense of nervousness or psychoneurotic manifestations. In other words, psychopathic characters tend to withdraw from their immediate environments whenever they feel threatened (Genter 155). For example, after committing murder, psychopath’s may display a unique coolness that investigators may mistake for innocence. They many not show any kind of nervousness even if the situation is compelling. For example, psychopathic characters as Alex in the Clockwork Orange is not bothered even when he realizes that some of the women he raped died of shock. He maintains a unique comfort in the prison cells that causing some people believe that he is innocent. Lack of conscience among psychopaths is always driven by the belief that bad men are capable of doing what good men only dream. Therefore, they would rather live their dreams even if it makes other people suffer so much pain. l Poor in judgment and learning from experience
According to doctor Harvey M. Cleckley, the general depiction of
…show more content…
However, they rarely think about the negative consequences of
9
their actions. For example, in Clockwork Orange, Alex realizes that the reason why he has been arrested is that one of the women he raped has died, but before the police told him that, he didn’t notice that at all. In other words, he was not thinking at all about the negative consequences of his actions. He was not bothered about being arrested until he was incarcerated. Even Norman
Bates rarely thinks about the consequences of his actions. Perhaps, the only time he was bothered was when he realized that he had killed his mother. He could not bear the guilt and he had to exhume the body. However, even after exhuming the body and preserving it, he still continued to make conversations with her. It was such conversations that Marion Crane heard and though that
Norman’s mother was still alive. He did not realize that having the body in the house was evidence for the police or any investigating officer to realize his crimes. The inability to make good judgments is one of the reasons why many psychopaths are taken to psychiatric therapies if their actions are against laws. l Alienation from the
Hitcock states, "Every maker of mystery movies aims at getting the audience on the edge of their seats. The ingredient to keep them there is called "suspense." Producers cry for it, writers cry in agony to get it, and actors cry for joy when they do get it. I've often been asked
Psychopathy; the trait that truly distinguishes humans from ¨machines¨, emotionful to emotionless. Within the novel American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis, one may logically assume that the protagonist, Patrick Bateman is indeed implied to be a psycho as the title suggests. However upon further analyzation, Bateman is revealed to be an unreliable narrator, he does not captivate the reader with all of his emotions verbally, for they are revealed through his actions. Bateman certainly does murder people, however, clinically murder doesn´t rule somebody to be a psychopath. Bateman feels no visible remorse for the victims he kills, because Bateman lives in an artificial hyperbole of a yuppie world where no love is shown, all relationships superficial.
An example of this is a man and his wife are arguing; he becomes enraged and murders his wife in the heat of the disagreement. This man has a clean record; he has never committed a murder or crime of any kind before “Statistical trends would project that he won’t murder again” (Samenow 2). This man is not a “monster,” psychopath, or a freak of nature; he is a normal person who reacts in an entirely wrong way to a hostile and stressful situation. He knew what he was doing was wrong, but he rationalized the crime with his emotions and feelings rather than his morals. The “Evil is in all of us, really, but it’s how it’s expressed” that separates criminals and law abiding citizens (Prattini).
Identifying the mystery of the psychopath can prove to help the them and the general public. Early awareness of the common psychopaths among us will reduce the impact on society. Further research is still needed to better help the psychopath and the general population.
Psychopaths come in big and small packages with many different forms of personalities. Most of the time these psychopaths pop up in the middle of the darkness when people are least expecting it, like at Columbine. There are many types like Eric and Dylan, who hide their emotions. Then, there are people who are open to their craziness and enjoy their lives as a psychopath, like Hannibal Lector or Norman Bates. Always remember, never judge a book by its
However, Glenn and Raine (2014) argue that the emotional deficits characteristic of psychopaths diminish their rational capacity, making them unable to be held accountable for the rash and harmful decisions. Additionally, psychopaths may display knowledge of right and wrong, however their understanding is substantially compromised (Maibom 2005). Therefore, because they cannot understand moral emotions, moral transgressions fail to motivate them and they cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. They treat moral transgressions as equal to conventional transgressions (Levy 2008); to them, they are merely breaking the rules. And although breaking the rules begets consequences, a short attention span prevents psychopaths from anticipating consequences. Nevertheless, say, for example, a psychopath on a different portion of the spectrum is aware of the consequences. In this case, they would be still be indifferent because their feelings of grandeur lead them to believe that they are removed from punishment (Gao, Glenn, Schug, Yang, Raine 2009). For these reasons, many argue that psychopaths should not be held responsible for their behaviors.
Psychopaths literally feel nothing when it comes to violence or fear. Levy studies show that the emotional sectors of the brain are damaged. This makes them dangerous. They can not see that something is hurting or they are hurting someone.
"John (Anthony) Burgess Wilson." DISCovering Authors. Detroit: Gale, 2003. Student Resources in Context. Web. 11 Mar. 2012.
One area of research in psychopathy focuses on the set of structures in the brain known as the limbic system, but more specifically on a structure known as the amygdala. According to neuropsychology class slides, the amygdala is involved in emotions and storage of emotions in memory as well as the fear response when encountering threatening environmental stimuli. Osumi and colleagues (2012) note that the affective and interpersonal facets of psychopathy, such as cold-heartedness and lack of empathy, which are thought to be the core features of psychopathy, are associated with reduced activity in the amygdala. This is coupled with the fact that a less functional amygdala is associated with a psychopathic individual’s exhibition of antisocial behaviors, at least in part because he will not perceive the threat of punishment as a consequence of his actions. So whether it be the acts against other people or the acts of justice that may be carried out against the perpetrator, the psychopath will perceive both as less significant, as compared to a non-psychopathic individual. (Osumi et al., 2012)
The introduction of the book introduces Dr. Robert Hare’s research on psychopaths. He and two graduate students wrote a paper detailing an experiment they preformed on a group of random adult males. They recorded the brain waves of the group doing a simple language activity.
Psychopaths are intelligent, appealing, and good at copying emotions seen from others. They pretend to care and may sometimes even act like they are there for you, which is all a means to get what they want.
...res of the psychopaths and gives the reader various examples of these individuals playing out these characteristics in everyday life. A widely used checklist is provided so the reader can get a wide spanning view of what is accounted for when scoring a psychopath. This form of research is very important within the deceitfulness of this population; it allows the professional to ignore their words and examine their actions. Hare made it clear that it is not uncommon for there to be an emotional and verbal disconnect from their actions. With virtually no emotional functioning psychopaths feel no remorse for the offenses that they commit and it is very important that we work towards using the opportunities we have to study and assist these populations; not only for them but for ourselves.
Scientists consider nature as a reason for psychopathy because of the way their brains are set up. One theory suggests that the one region located in the brain that is less active in psychopaths is the amygdala, which is normally linked with fear. In “The Wisdom of Psychopaths” Dutton explains that studies have been done and have proven that the brain has dysfunction. Dutton also explains a case study that he has done with the thought of killing one person over killing five. Psychopaths have no problem killing that one person.
The media most often showcases psychopaths as individuals who are inherently evil and dangerous towards themselves and others. Yet, this concept of psychopathy goes far beyond this idea of pure evil and instead necessitates a needed psychological understanding. These individuals, psychopaths, are generally characterized by a lack of empathy and conscience. Indeed, psychopath’s indifference to the repercussions of their actions combined with other characteristics such as hostility and aggression make for a potentially dangerous personality (Lyken, 1996, p.30). In order to identify a psychopath’s recidivism, it is important to differentiate them from sociopaths who, instead of having a psychological impairment that makes it difficult for them to socialize, have been systematically under socialized (Lyken, 1996, p.30). In accordance. psychologists have developed the methods such as the Psychopathy Checklist- Revised (PCL-R) to help identify those with psychopathic tendencies (Walters, 2012, p.409). That is why predictions of recidivism among psychopaths is most efficient when done
Depictions of psychopaths today have become exaggerated based off of what you see in movies and films. The psychopaths in movies are believed to be dangerous or have an anti-social personality disorder. Not all psychopaths can be defined in that manner. Psychopaths are identified as people who are emotionally unstable. They are ultimately suffering from a chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behavior. There have been studies ultimately wondering if a psychopath is born, or is it raised? Genetics and environment combine to produce conditions that create psychopathology. By paying attention to environmental variables we can potentially reduce the amount of people who become dangerous psychopaths.