Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical concerns of negligence
Essay on a case study of negligence in
Essay on a case study of negligence in
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical concerns of negligence
Re: Clinical Negligence Claim Following our initial meeting we would be pleased to advise you on your clinical negligence claims. From the particulars taken from such meeting we understand that the initial leg injury occurred while you were on tour with your football team in Oxfordshire during a football game. As a result of your injury you were admitted to the Royal Oak hospital for surgery which was subsequently performed negligently, thus affecting your mobility. You expressed that you also wish us to conduct a case against the Community Health team of Swansea NHS Trust for failing to keep physiotherapy appointments of which you should be having three times a week, and on one occasion going without for almost twenty one and a half weeks; …show more content…
The practitioners conduct is to be judged against the state of professional knowledge at the time of the matter concerned. The acceptable standard of care is assessed by the general practice of doctors in England and Wales and is usually defined by what would be a reasonable standard of care. However there are sometimes difficulties when assessing this as there are sometimes differences of opinions on the matter. This is known as the ‘Bolam test’. An action will not amount to negligence unless it is carried out without ordinary care. Considering the facts of your case I believe it would be found that the surgeon acted without reasonable care and not in line with proper practice accepted in his profession, providing the surgeon had not mentioned that mobility could be adversely affected before the surgery took place. The breach of duty test will then be satisfied. Regarding the claim against the physiotherapist, it must be established that the actions of the Community Health team’s actions fell below the Health and Care Professions Council Standards of Conduct Performance and Ethics that governs physiotherapists. Referencing the failure to keep appointments and the Consultant’s statement I believe that the breach of duty test would be …show more content…
This means that we must provide the evidence that shows that on the balance of probabilities, that the medical professional in question did in fact breach his duty of care to you. Limitations The time limit for bringing a clinical negligence claim is three years. The time runs from the date of the negligence or from the date that you had knowledge of the factors that make up the claim. Funding Legal Aid is no longer available for clinical negligence claims of this type, following the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. The usual mechanisms for funding a clinical negligence claim are: a) Private Funds b) Legal Expense Insurance- some insurance policies cover personal injury claims. c) Conditional Fee Agreements- some solicitors make take on your case on a ‘no win no fee’ basis. If the case is not successful you would not have to pay the other side’s solicitors fees. However this is only available in straight forward cases, so it is unlikely this would be a viable option for you. . Complaints
“One of those obligations is that it must exercise a proper degree of care for its patients, and, to the extent that it fails in that care, it should be liable in damages as any other commercial firm would be
Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation & Correction are the poor-quality patient care that Tomcik received and Tomcik’s health being at risk. Once engaged in a doctor-patient relationship, physicians are obligated to provide the best possible care for the patient by utilizing their skills and knowledge as expected from a competent physician under the same or similar conditions (“What Is a Doctor’s Duty of Care?” n.d.). However, in Tomcik’s situation, Dr. Evans did not deliver high-quality care, for he administered a perfunctory breast examination and thus did not follow standard protocols. There is evidence of indifference conveyed by Dr. Evans, and the lack of proper care towards Tomcik is an issue that can be scrutinized and judged appropriately. Additionally, Tomcik’s health was at risk due to the failure of a proper physical evaluation and the incredibly long delay in diagnosis and treatment. The negligence from Dr. Evans, along with the lack of medical attention sought out by Tomcik after she had first discovered the lump in her breast, may contribute to Tomcik’s life being in danger as well as the emotional anguish she may have felt during that time period. Overall, the incident of Tomcik’s expectations from the original physician and other employees at the institution not being met is an ethical issue that should be dealt with
advice, the health care professionals did not treat the situation in a way that respects and dignifies the patient. The patient’s state of mind barred him from making competent decisions regarding his health care. Considering Mr. T’s psychiatric state, as evidenced by his suicidal tendencies, he should have been placed on a psychiatric hold so as to prevent any harm that he may inflict upon himself. The health care professionals did not take Mr. T’s value/worth as a human into consideration and allowed him to leave against medical advice.
Medical error occurs more than most people realize and when a doctor is found negligent the patient has the right to sue for compensation of their losses. Debates and issues arise when malpractice lawsuits are claimed. If a patient is filing for a medical malpractice case, the l...
Forrester, K., & Griffiths, D. (2010). Essentials of law for health professionals. Sydney: Mosby Elsevier. Retrieved from Google Books.
Any patient harmed by the provision of a healthcare service is informed of the fact and an appropriate remedy offered, regardless of whether a complaint has been made or question asked about it. This is how the term “candour” is defined by Robert Francis in his report (1). GMC defines the professional duty of candour as openness and honesty when things go wrong (2). This is applicable not only to patients but also to colleagues, employers and regulators. In a profession as stressful as medicine where doctors and other healthcare professionals are entrusted with the provision of care to people, it is vital for the care givers to be completely honest with their patients, especially when things wrong. It is not an easy task and doctors hesitate to do so due to a number of reasons such as the fact that doctors see themselves as solely benevolent and do not appreciate that they may be sources
The guidelines that are in the Belmont Report give many important principles that doctors and allied health workers should follow. The guidelines in belmont principles cover a wide variety of bioethical situations that persons working in a medical field might encounter, or rights that one might expect to receive if needing medical treatment. The four main key points included are, beneficence, justice, non-maleficence, and autonomy. What if though, as a patient, these guidelines were ignored and your rights were ignored? This is exactly what happened to someone known only as patient X.
Q1: Nursing and Midwifery council of NSW (NMC) manages complaints that may constitute unsatisfactory professional conduct via the conduct pathway. According to NSW legislation (2010), Health Practitioner Regulation Law, Section 139 B, One of the definitions of “unsatisfactory professional conduct” is a “conduct significantly below reasonable standards”. Therefore, a practitioner, whose demonstrated skills, judgement or knowledge is significantly below one’s expected level of training or experience, is determined to have unsatisfactory professional conduct. In the case study CONYARD (2015), the respondent has registered as a nurse from 1989; she has extensive experience in both pathology and general ward. She was also the “nurse in charge” since
Other information that might reveal the NHS Trust and staff has been omitted in order to comply with the NMC 2008) code of conduct and the Data Protection Act (1998). Mrs Masood had been admitted onto an acute medical admissions ward with for pain investigation and possible meningitis. Mrs Masood also suffered from hypertension, which required hypertension, which had recently been out of control and required daily monitoring. Mrs Masood had a good sense of humour. She had been on the ward for over a week, so I was asked assigned to check her neurological observations and blood pressure every four hours I was quite at easy to do so.
Medical malpractice cases are difficult for the families who have lost their loved one or have suffered from severe injuries. No one truly wins in complicated court hearings that consist of a team of litigation attorneys for both the defendant and plaintiff(s). During the trial, evidence supporting malpractice allegations have to be presented so that the court can make a decision if the physician was negligent resulting in malpractice, or if the injury was unavoidable due to the circumstances. In these types of tort cases, the physician is usually a defendant on trial trying to prove that he or she is innocent of the medical error, delay of treatment or procedure that caused the injury. The perfect example of being at fault for medical malpractice as a result of delaying a procedure is the case of Waverly family versus John Hopkins Health System Corporation. The victims were not compensated enough for the loss of their child’s normal life. Pozgar (2012) explained….
Showing that program structure, program processes, program outcomes, client satisfaction, and cost effectiveness will all be considered to ensure that all individuals involved the best practises will be followed (Dyck, 2013). Claim management steps should also be taken in Suzie’s case due to unaffordable ambulance, physiotherapy and medical fees. Through completing the proper checklist of claim adjudication, such as appropriate documentation, it’s a work related injury, employee is under treatment, and that medical information supports it being a long-term disability claim are only a few supporting examples. To sum up, the initial assessment of Suzie’s case brings many critical points to understand for the Disability Case Manager. Many surface issues such as conflict between the organization and employee must be addressed, this can be done by insuring policy is addressed and conveyed to both sides, making it clear an Intergraded Disability Plan will be followed. This includes assessments of the employee and workplace situation, development of rehabilitation plan, goal setting and coordination of the case, and brokering return-to-work
My colleague and I received an emergency call to reports of a female on the ground. Once on scene an intoxicated male stated that his wife is under investigation for “passing out episodes”. She was lying supine on the kitchen floor and did not respond to A.V.P.U. I measured and inserted a nasopharyngeal airway which was initially accepted by my patient. She then regained consciousness and stated, “Oh it’s happened again has it?” I removed the airway and asked my colleague to complete base line observations and ECG which were all within the normal range. During history taking my patient stated that she did not wish to travel to hospital. However each time my patient stood up she collapsed and we would have to intervene to protect her safety and dignity, whilst also trying to ascertain what was going on. During the unresponsive episodes we returned the patient to the stretcher where she spontaneously recovered and refused hospital treatment. I completed my patient report form to reflect the patient's decision and highlighted my concerns. The patient’s intoxicated husband then carried his wife back into the house.
“The definition of a health professional is a person who works to protect and improve people’s health by the diagnosis and treatment of illness to bring about a complete recovery from mental, physical and social perspectives, either directly or indirectly (Kurban, 2010, pg. 760).” Nurses in the community today have acquired an increasing responsibility to intervene with medical decisions. In the past, there were clear differences between nurses and doctors. It was more common for a nurse to be supervised directly under the physician. They are not just performing Doctor’s orders anymore. The nurse role in patient care has been widely expanded. Allegations against someone can be one of the most stressful moments of their careers. Negligence is a defined understanding in nursing to help understand the roles and rules provided, as well as what can be interpreted as negligence.
Medical Doctors have a vast amount of duties and responsibilities they must perform daily in order to ensure a superlative level of care for all patients. Commitment to professional competence is an essential part of physician responsibility. Physicians must be committed to lifelong learning, and be able to adapt and maintain medical knowledge, and clinical and team skills. More broadly, the profession as a whole must progress to the point that all practicing medicine will be competent and have the mechanisms available to accomplish this goal. Commitment to honesty with patients is another essential role of all physicians. Physicians must make sure that patients are completely and honestly informed before the treatment and after it has occurred. This means that patients should not be involved in every minute decisions regarding their medical care, but be supported to decide on the course of therapy. Whenever patients are injured as a result of medical care, patients should be notified rapidly, because failure to report this could seriously compromise patient and societal trust. Reporting and analyzing medical mal-practice provides the basis for appropriate prevention and improveme...
“Is There Personal Responsibility In Healthcare?” Medical Malprocess. 4 March, 2009. Web.19 April, 2014. < http://thesystemmd.com/?p=230 >