Clearance Earl Gideon, and a Supreme Court fights for the entitlement to counsel. There were excessive pleas to the crimes to which he was convicted but didn’t commit. He was unable to afford a lawyer, but insisted one be appointed to him when he was denied the right to counsel, Gideon considered it as not being a fair trial. He then appealed to the United States Supreme Court were on March 18, 1963 won his case. Clearance changed the lives of millions of people that were to poor afford proper counsel and changed history forever (Dudley 9-17).
In Panama City Florida at Bay Harbor Poolroom 1961 a man by the name of Clearance Earl Gideon was arrested for robbery. Clearance knew he had no chance at proving his innocence due to his current financial statues, and previous criminal history. Gideon had been arrested twice before the poolroom for similar crimes, but released because evidence proved otherwise. On August 4 Gideon’s trial was held at the Circuit Court of Bay County (Dudley11-13). When Gideon was asked if he was ready for his trial he said “I request this court to appoint counsel to represent me in this trial” (Gideon). The Florida law at the time said lawyers can only be appointed for capital and felony offenses, which was ruled by the Supreme Court in 1932. Since Gideon was tried for a minor offense he was refused counsel (Gideon).
Our founding fathers wrote the Constitution for a purpose. Article three of the constitution states that both the Supreme Court and all lower courts are required to interpret the law. Also, the sixth amendment states that you have the right to a fair trial also meaning he has the right to an attorney (Characters). When Gideon wasn’t appointed counsel he appealed his case to the United ...
... middle of paper ...
...e). After the final trial he won his case. Have you ever heard when you get arrested they say you have the right to an attorney if you cannot afford one one will be appointed to you. Clearance Gideon is a man as of why one will be appointed to you at no charge. As Justice Hugo L. Black once said “There can be no equal justice where the kind of trial a man depends on the amount of money he has” (Dudley 79).
"The Characters of Freedom." N.p., n.d. Web. .
Dudley, Mark E. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): Right to Counsel. New York: Twenty-First Century, 1995. Print.
GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 15 April 2014. .
McBride, Alex. "The Supreme Court." N.p., n.d. Web.
The movie starts off with Gideon being charged with petty theft and going to court. Gideon is considered a have-not; he is extremely poor and barely literate. When he gets to court, he asks the judge to appoint him a lawyer because he cannot afford one. The judge denies this, saying that in Florida the only time the court can appoint council is if the defendant had committed a capitol offense. Because of this, Gideon is unable to provide a solid defense and is declared guilty and sentenced to five years in prison. Being a have-not, the judge’s decision to not appoint Gideon a lawyer wasn’t even
The case of Ford V. Wainwright is a Supreme court case of the United Stated argued in 1986. Alvin Bernard Ford is the plaintiff in this case, In 1974 he was convicted of murder in Florida and sentenced to death. In 1982 Ford began to show signs of a serious mental disorder. The Governor of Florida then appointed a panel of three psychiatrist to determine if Ford was component to understand the nature of the death penalty and the crime he had committed. All three psychiatrist disagreed on his exact diagnosis but agreed that he was sane and knew the nature of the death penalty. Ford’s attorney unsuccessfully sought a hearing in the state court for determination of his competency and then filed a hebeas corpus petition, which is a writ requiring a person to be brought before a judge or court especially for investigation of a restraint of the person’s liberty. The Florida courts denied his petition and signed a death warrant for Ford in 1984. Ford then sued Louie L. Wainwright, the defendant, who at the time of the case was the Secretary of the Florida Division of Correction.
In Gideon's Trumpet Anthony Lewis documents Clarence Earl Gideon's struggle for a lawyer, during an era where it was not necessary in the due process to appoint an attorney to those convicted.
"Ford v. Wainwright." LII / Legal Information Institute. Legal Information Institute, n.d. Web. 19 Feb. 2014.
In Federalist no. 78 Hamilton explains the powers and duties of the judiciary department as developed in Article III of the Constitution. Article III of the Constitution is very vague on the structure of the federal courts. Hamilton had to convince Americans that the federal courts would not run amok. He presented that the federal courts would not have unlimited power but that they would play a vital role in the constitutional government. Hamilton limited judiciary power by defining it as a text-bound interpretative power. (R.B Bernstein) This essay was intended to endorse as well as interpret the Constitution.
At his trial Gideon could not afford a lawyer, so he asked the judge to appoint him one, Gideon argued that the Court should appoint him one because the Sixth Amendment says that everyone is entitled to a lawyer. The judge turned down his request, saying that the state did not have to pay a poor person's legal defense unless he was charged with a capital crime or that "special circumstances" existed. Gideon was left to represent himself in court.
Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested in 1961 and charged with breaking and entering a pool hall with intent to commit theft, by taking money out of vending machines. What he did at the time was considered a felony. When it came time to have the trial he did not have enough money for a lawyer and asked that one be appointed to defend him. The judge denied the request saying that under Florida state law counsel can be appointed only in a capital offense. Since Gideon didn’t have a lawyer and was not educated to defend himself he lost easily to the prosecution.
On the morning of January 8th 1962, the Supreme Court received mail from prisoner 003826 of Florida State Prison, also known as Clarence Earl Gideon. In the envelope contained a hand written letter with questionable grammar from Gideon claiming that he was denied a fair trial due to the absence of a lawyer. Gideon’s writ of certiorari was an in forma pauperis petition or pauper’s petition. Due to the fact that most paupers’ petitions are from inmates who do not have the legal means to properly file a certiorari, the Court had special methods of handling cases such as Gideon’s. Paupers’ petitions according to Justice Frankfurter were “almost unintelligible and certainly do not present a clear statement of issues necessary for our understanding”(Lewis 35). It is reasonable to assume that the Court would not spend an exorbitant amount of time going through mounds of paupers’ petitions trying to find a case that seemed presentable. Statistically, about thirteen percent of petitions for certiorari on the regular docket are paupers’ petitions. In addition, only three percent of paupers’ petitions end up being granted. Nevertheless, Gideon’s case was treated just as equally as any other in forma pauperis case. Gideon’s handwritten documents were held for a month until Florida authorities replied to petition. A month passed by and Gideon’s petition was mailed to the office of Chief Justice Earl Warren in 1962. A conference was held in June to discuss whether or not Gideon’s petition should be granted. Gideon’s case was granted three days after the conference and from that day forward Gideon’s fight for justice would ensue. In the eyes of Gideon, an attorney was a fundamental right of due process. However, his biggest ch...
SHELLEY v. KRAEMER. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 23 March 2014. .
This is a petition for post-conviction relief filed by Petitioner, Mr. Douglas W. Curtis (“Petitioner”), on January 24, 2018, and opposed by Respondent, the State of Tennessee (“the State”). The Court heard the Petition on May 22, 2018, taking the matter under advisement. Mr. Curtis alleges that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in his trial and is, accordingly, entitled to post-conviction relief.
Oct 1993. Retrieved November 18, 2010. Vol. 79. 134 pages (Document ID: 0747-0088) Published by American Bar Association
Remy, Richard C., Gary E. Clayton, and John J. Patrick. "Supreme Court Cases." Civics Today. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe, 2008. 796. Print.
Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Abadinsky, Howard. Law and Justice: An Introduction to the American Legal System. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.
United States of America. U.S. Supreme Court. Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School, 1 Apr. 2003. 13 Nov. 2013