Classical Conditioning Essay

717 Words3 Pages
Classical conditioning can be describe as a reflexive or automatic type of learning in which a stimulus acquires the capacity to evoke a response that was originally evoked by another stimulus. It was first described by Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936), a Russian physiologist, in 1903, and studied in infants by John B. Watson (1878-1958). In the 1920 's John b. Watson and Rosaline Rayner trailed to show how fear can be induced in an infant through classical conditioning. Designating conditional emotional reactions attempt would become the most infamous psychology studies that has been conducted and would be entitled "the case of little Albert”. Watson goal was to get Albert very afraid of the white rat by comparing the white rat with a very loud, clashing…show more content…
(Porter. B., 2013) unconditional stimulus would mean noise. Every Time the child hears that loud clashing sound the bar hitting the steel, it would cause the child to have abnormal breathing showing that he was terrified & was feared of the white rat and the steel bar. (Porter. B., 2013) Conditioned stimulus would represent The Rat the sounds repeats itself, after the unconditional stimulus it would let the child know that both sounds go together. (Porter. B., 2013). The child would always cry a lot when these noises kept coming back to back .This would be consider the Conditioned response which related to Crying and Fear. This would be the response from comparing the two together the white rat and the steel bar and trying educated the child that both theses go…show more content…
When the Santa Claus mask was showed to Albert he stilled showed signs of fear but Albert wasn 't the only tested at the moment, there were other babies tested as well More than one test was completed several times? The child learning level seemed to be higher than any other test that had been done enhancing a provocation with crying. (Watson J. B., & Rayner, R., 2013) .The dog was another test presented to Albert The dog had approached the child but he had a very different reaction from when the first time he was dealing with the rabbit. It 's like Albert didn 't even visualize the dog until it started walking away and that 's when the child started to cry. (Watson J. B., & Rayner, R., 2013). As the rabbit was placed in front of Albert he tried move away from it and started crying so they placed the rabbit in front of once again and he still wasn 't giving a positive feedback Albert cried again. (Watson J. B., & Rayner, R., 2013) Watson & Rayner tested the fur coat as well. When the coat was placed in front of Albert he instantly step away from it. They introduced a second time and Albert stood there & wrinkled his nose still no positive feedback. Albert withdrawal immediately. (Watson J. B., & Rayner, R.,
Open Document