Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
family and household structure
family and household structure
social class and child rearing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: family and household structure
Social class, group of people who rank similarly in term of property, power, and prestige, separate people into different lifestyles and provide them with distinctive ways of looking at the world. It gives each individual 's different roles to perform and allow them onto different stages. Social class set people onto different path; it open opportunities to some, but close it from others. In the article, “Class Differences in Child-Rearing Are on the Rise” by Claire Cain Miller describes the impact of parents’ social class on raising a child. This article argues that families of different social classes supervise their child differently. Miller argues that families of upper class prepare their child to be more likely to success and maintain their higher social class status. I totally agree with what Miller said about upper class parents; they enrolled their child with tight schedule that’s full of activities and after-school programs. They see their children as projects in need of huge investment and cultivation, which I feel is an advantage and disadvantage. These children develop the skills to …show more content…
For example, in my life my parents has a mixture of quality from upper and lower class on how they raise me. My parents, who tend to fall in the middle class, are strict when it comes to earning high grades; they believe in the importance of going to college, especially attending in a prestige college. They are in concern with living in a “bad” neighborhood because they fear of the danger and negative influences. However, unlike some affluent parents, they don’t force me to enroll in lot of activities and program or teach me to question authority figures. Also, unlike lower-income parents, they’re not too involved in my education and tend to keep me under close
As much as society tries to deny the fact that the family that one comes from determines their fate, in almost every case this very fact is true. Today, we see how infants who are born into wealthy families are treated differently than children who are born into drug and disease-stricken poverty. Higher classed people stand out in society on both a local and national level much more than the average middle class working family.
The book Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life published in 2003, takes a close look into the lives of different families in the United States and how they are affected by race and social class and how their family lives differ. The Author, Annette Lareau, discusses how social class affects the parenting styles and how these parenting styles are affecting the children. Although Lareau’s book could use a few changes, it is well written and it is a good read to help better understand how social class and parenting styles can affect the lives of different children on a personal level. In
After reading “Invisible Inequality: Social Class and Childrearing in Black families and White Families,” by Annette Lareau, it was evident that she collected much data from her study of different types of families. In this study with the help of other sociologists, Lareau went into the lives of both black and white middle class and working class/ poor families. In her study she observed the behavior of children at home, school, and in the public eye. She observed the parenting methods the adults chose to use and the child’s reaction to them. Lareau and her team were able to see what influences certain factors such as income, race, family size, home location, schooling, and career choices had on each family and their children. The purpose of this study as well as the central argument is very well addressed by Lareau in the text and leads to many well supported conclusions.
In her article she points out how social class has become the main gateway to opportunity in America. The widening academic divide means that kids who grow up poor will most likely stay poor and the kids who grow up rich will most likely stay rich. About fifty years ago the main concern about getting a good education relied on your race but now it's about your social class. Researchers are starting to believe that children who come from higher income families tend to do better in school and get higher test scores.
Yes, when thinking about social classes in the Unites States, it is easier to gravitate towards the differences among them. However, through reading about the different families in Unequal Childhoods, there are similarities across social classes. One of the similarities among the middle, working, and poor class is the “absent” of parental involvement. Now, this also depends on how the reader views the situation. For the poor class or working class families, such as Katie Brindle and Tyrec Taylor, their parents left them alone to play on their own. Katie Brindle is a White girl who comes from a poor class family. Tyrec Taylor is a Black boy and is part of working class. Lareau observes, “Most working-class and poor parents did not consider children’s
With higher class comes a distinct parenting style referred to as “concerted cultivation”. Gladwell highlights this advantage with the implementation of ethos, using expert sociologist Annette Lareau. Lareau elaborates on how concerted cultivation is “an attempt to actively foster and assess a child’s talents, opinions and skills” (Lines 14-15).
The upper class are able to afford all kinds of things that put their children at a higher advantage. Whether it be playing tennis at a country club, private piano lessons, and etc. The lower class have less access to these types of learning experiences for their children. They are more of a self-taught learner, and success is rarely a solo achievement. That was the whole takeaway from Lareau's study. She conducted a study with twelve families within the middle and the lower class, and saw how they performed based on their parenting skills. She learned that they’re two child learning styles. First method is Concerted Cultivation. This is commonly used by wealthier families. These kids would have more privilege than the majority, "One of the well-off children Lareau followed played on a baseball team, two soccer teams...lessons" (pg.103-104.) and, "They expected their children... authority." Parents are highly involved with their child’s success, being active in their lives and their talents. Teaching them how to perform their own insights, as oppose of adults talking down to children. Second method is Natural growth. Parents see their children already growing and taking care of themselves and are seen as less whiny and more behaved. However, were not taught to speak up for one's self to a higher authority, "The poorer children were, to her mind, often better behaved...
I will explore how social classes frankly appear and build up the story of the book by comparing and contrast with a modern social hierarchy. Today, we’re living in a society with social classes existing. We can be classified in different classes and so do I. I wish I could designate my social status, but unfortunately, our social classes are usually determined by wealth (income), occupation, education and prestige. Social class can be shown in a pyramid structure and it usually comprises with upper class, upper middle class, lower middle class, working class and lower class.
Family functions as a very important social institution, and the primary agent of socialization (Snedker, 10/19/2016). To expand, parents and other family members are the first exposure to the world children have, and therefore leave a lasting impact on kids in terms of how they see themselves and the people around them. However, this impact isn’t always positive. This especially shows in the differences between upper and lower income families. For example, In Lareau’s piece Invisible Inequality, two boys in families with different SESs, are studied. On one hand, the boy in the higher SES family had less freedom and spent more time in extracurricular activities. Due to this, he acquired more cultural capital than the other boy. This boy’s mother also encouraged him to to be more assertive and confident with authority figures, so he was able to learn various life skills, such as speaking to a doctor, that the other boy wasn’t able to. The boy from the lower SES family however, spent much more time with other children and watching television. These factors play out to make the lower SES boy less confident and more confined than the other boy (Lareau,
Where the rich or people who were born with benefits are much more advanced. If you were born in certain class, you will die in it. Then it connected to how selfish and not caring today’s society is. Therefore Miller suggests that we need to steer the unfortunate children and not only help them to get into colleges, but help them to form the best experiences they can have to build a better resume once they graduate.
In this documentary, many of the individuals were “born rich,” meaning that they have inherited an excessive amount of money, not because of their intelligence and talent, but because they are heirs to wealth. The director of the film, Jamie Johnson highlights the life of the rich, in which the wealthy 1% have more than the rest of the 99% of people. Meritocracy is non-existent in the life of the rich. A rich person has many educational benefits, because they have the networks and connections that those of the middle and lower classes do not have. The rich have the right access to schools because of their wealth and power that comes from their wealthy status. For example, in the documentary one of the rich kids, Luke Weil, attended Brown University and was describing his entry to the Ivy League as expected. He did well on the boards, but it was “incidental” (Weil, movie) because without it he would have still went to Brown University or any other Ivy League University because of his inherited wealth. Interestingly, even when he attended Brown University, he was not a good student, where in his first year he did not attend more than eight academic events, including tests and exams. As a result, he was put on academic probation because he was not attending classes so he was
In Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, Annette Lareau discussed the extensive amount of research she conducted employing observational and interview techniques. She collected data on the middle class, working class, and poor families. She was trying to understand the impact of a child’s early parental guidance on the child’s life. She was able to conduct this research with 12 families, all of whom had fourth graders. She gathered enough information to conclude the major differences in the parenting styles of each type of family, which was directly correlated to socioeconomic status. Annette Lareau opens her book with two chapters to give the reader an idea on what the examples she gives will detail.
Numerous other studies have also showed how children seem to mimic the persona of their parents. It is well-known that children often attempt to copy their parents, but furthermore they seem to become a certain type of person that fits the “middle-class” mold. These children see how their parents interact with other adults through aspects such as their speech and even dress. This prompts the children to expect the same results when acting in the same manner. The working-class students rarely see how their parents interact with such entitlement either because they do not have the means or the confidence. They in turn remain more timid and less pro-active.
Socioeconomic status (SES) is a measurement of a combination of education, income and occupation (American Psychological Association, 2014). It is more commonly known as class standing. There is a drastic difference in lifestyle between class standings. In today’s economy it has become more evident just how different the classes are. Lower levels of SES do not have access to good schools, or decent health care leading to a worse quality of life. Higher levels of SES have access to more resources and tend to allow for children to develop self-esteem, optimism, and perceived control (American Psychological Association, 2014). The traditional family with two parents, the father works, and the mother stays more is almost nonexistent. Households where the man works and the woman stays at home only represent 7% of the U.S. population (Malone, Stewart, Wilson & Korsching, 2010). It has become increasingly more difficult to live on one income especially with children. With ...
In today’s society people are viewed as being in different classes depending on how much money they bring in. The categorization of people is known as classism. Classism is simply the prejudice or in favor of people belonging to a particular social class. Classism is known as one of the largest social problems plaguing the world today. Classes are formed according to how the rules of the following institutions; government regulations and economic status. It is held in place by a system of beliefs and cultural attitudes that ranks people according to their; economic status, family lineage, job status, and level of education. There are three major classifications to which people are titled. They include upper or high class which includes the people with the most money. The middle class who includes the people that brings home the average income. Finally, the class titled the lower class that includes the people who have only one income coming in or none at all (“What Is Classism.”). In the classrooms these classes still remain and the students within each class have different ways in which they learn, and view schooling. We as educators have to look passed their ways and address each class the same.