Clarke's Theory Of Childhood Summary

450 Words1 Page

In his chapter Clarke examines the view of the French historian Philippe Ariès about the idea of childhood through the ages and its main criticisms. Ariès claims that childhood did not always exist as a term or concept and children were treated as small versions of adults (Mook, 2007; Lowe, 2009). Van den Berg (1956) also supports this view whereas Hanawalt (2003) supports that there was a difference in the concept of childhood and adolescence since medieval and renaissance scholars. Childhood started to be conceptualized from the 17th century and there were many reasons that influenced its formation (Aries, 1962; Mook, 2007). The evidence that Clarke provides proves that childhood as a term together with the life of children changed over the time influenced by different factors like falmily-model, romanticism, religious beliefs, social class, industrialization and schooling. Other authors agree with that too (Mook, 2007; Lowe, 2009). The idea of Ariès received a number of criticisms. Some argued that the idea of childhood existed in medieval times (Pollock, 1983; Shahar, 1992). Clarke finally comes to the conclusion that despite the critiques of Aries work, childhood may be a modern social construction as children’s life has changed due to …show more content…

Future research should be worthwhile to explore further the idea of childhood in modern societies as children are those who will define history in the future and investing in them is for sure important. Another important issue related to the appearance of the term is that if childhood is a social construction as supported widely from the literature, how is it possible for historians to trace the term in the past since it is not the same as defined today and maybe the fact that it is not makes it itself difficult to be found. What if the term was so different conceptualized then that it cannot be understood and therefore not found

Open Document