Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
past and present the great gatsby
the great gatsby: film and novel similarity
the great gatsby mortality essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: past and present the great gatsby
Cinematic Appropriations of The Great Gatsby
Although Paramount's 1974 version of The Great Gatsby - the one with Robert Redford and Mia Farrow - is probably the most famous, there have actually been six attempts to flatten Fitzgerald's novel into two dimensions. The first was a silent film released in 1926. The second version, with Alan Ladd as Gatsby, appeared in 1949. Two television adaptations followed, one with Robert Montgomery in 1955 and the other with Robert Ryan in 1958. The controversial 1974 adaptation rings in at number five. The sixth version of Gatsby is slated to run on the A&E cable network early next year - Mira Sorvino will play Daisy and Toby Stephens will star as Gatsby. Six! All lacking. All critical failures. [1] So why do they do it? What is it about the novel that tempts Hollywood producers, directors, and the occasional ingenue?
Hollywood screenwriter DeWitt Bodeen wrote in the preface to Gene Phillips' Fiction, Film, and F. Scott Fitzgerald:
"Youth is the keynote of every Fitzgerald tale - its careless ecstasy during one's twenties and the inevitable loss of it in one's thirties . . . His characters are all sad young men whose flame of life has burnt down to a lambent glow by the time they've got out of their twenties. This has become the basic problem of translating to the screen the stories of F. Scott Fitzgerald: very few actors who have names are young enough to interpret them believably." [2]
Bodeen sees youth as a necessity to play Gatsby. I would agree, but for a different reason. Hollywood is in love with The Great Gatsby. Every leading man wants to play Jay Gatsby and every starlet Daisy Buchanan. But each successive Jay G...
... middle of paper ...
...iction, Film, and F. Scott Fitzgerald. Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1986 (117).
[6] Irene Kahn Atkins, "In Search of the Greatest Gatsby", Literature/Film Quarterly, 3, Summer 1974 (217).
[7] DeWitt Bodeen. "Preface: Hollywood and the Screenwriter", Fiction, Film, and F. Scott Fitzgerald. Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1986 (xviii).
[8] Elliot Nugent. Events Leading up to the Comedy: An Autobiography. New York: Trident Press, 1965. (213-214).
[9] Minty Clinch. Robert Redford. Kent: New English Library, 1989 (114).
[10] Ibid (116).
[11] Ibid (116).
[12] Ibid (119).
[13] "Wanted: Aristocrats, $1.65 Per Hour", Time. July 23, 1973. (87)
[14] Minty Clinch. Robert Redford. Kent: New English Library, 1989 (118).
[15] Ibid (122).
[16] F. Scott Fitzgerald. The Great Gatsby. New York: Scribner's, 1991 (116).
Hooper, Osman C. "Fitzgerald's ‘The Great Gatsby'," The Critical Reputation of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Article A353. Ed. Jackson Bryer. Archon Books, Maryland: 1967.
Chambers, John B. The Novels of F. Scott Fitzgerald. London: Macmillan/New York: St Martin's P, 1989.
Gidmark, Jill B. “F. Scott Fitzgerald.” Cycolpedia Of World Authors, Fourth Revised Edition (2003): 1-2. Literary Reference Center. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.
Bloom, Harold, ed. Modern Critical Views: F. Scott Fitzgerald. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1985.
Trilling, Lionel. "F. Scott Fitzgerald." Critical Essays on Scott Fitzgerald's "Great Gatsby." Ed. Scott Donaldson. Boston: Hall, 1984. 13-20.
Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. Ed. Matthew J. Bruccoli, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1925
Fowler, Karen J.Introduction. Pride and Prejudice. Jane Austen: The Complete Novels. By Jane Austen. New York: Penguin, 2006. 211-421. Print.
Sherry, James. "Pride and Prejudice: The Limits of Society." Studies in English Literature (1979): 609-622. Web.
The comparison of Fay Weldon’s 1984 epistolic novel Letters to Alice on First Reading Jane Austen (here after ‘Letters’) enhances the understanding of the importance of values, issues and context in the 1813 novel, Pride and Prejudice (here after ‘Pride’). This is demonstrated through the examining of the similar and contrasting connections between the texts. Despite the large varsity between the contextual
Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Norton Critical 3rd edition, ed. Donald Gray New York and London: Norton, 2001.
"Psychological Growth in Pride and Prejudice | MSS Research." MSS Research. MSS Research, n.d. Web. 02 May 2015.
Wright, Andrew H. "Feeling and Complexity in Pride and Prejudice." Ed. Donald Gray. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1966. 410-420.
The main theme of Macbeth-the destruction wrought when ambition goes unchecked by moral constraints-finds its most powerful expression in the play's two main characters. Macbeth is a courageous Scottish general who is not naturally inclined to commit evil deeds, yet he deeply desires power and advancement. He kills Duncan against his better judgment and afterward stews in guilt and paranoia. Toward the end of the play he descends into a kind of frantic, boastful madness. Lady Macbeth, on the other hand, pursues her goals with greater determination, yet she is less capable of withstanding the repercussions of her immoral acts. One of Shakespeare's most forcefully drawn female characters, she spurs her husband mercilessly to kill Duncan and urges him to be strong in the murder's aftermath, but she is eventually driven to distraction by the effect of Macbeth's repeated bloodshed on her conscience. In each case, ambition helped, of course, by the malign prophecies of the witches is what drives the couple to ever more terrible atrocities. The problem, the play suggests, is that once one decides to use violence to further one?s quest for power, it is difficult to stop. There are always potential threats to the throne?Banquo, Fleance, Macduff?and it is always tempting to use violent means to dispose of them.
Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen’s famous novel, is, in large part, a study of marriage. It is an interesting novel for Austen since she was never married. The social culture of Austen’s day made marriage a crucial aspect of a woman 's life. A women in that time was dependent on a man for money and social standing. Synonyms for marriage are union and alliance both have very different meanings. Marriage as a union implies a fully joined couple. A marital alliance suggests that marriage is an association for mutual benefit such as money, social standing, or physical desires. Austen 's characters are developed to emphasize these differences in the reasons for marriage. She makes abundantly clear through her development of these marriages
Sherry, James. "Pride and Prejudice: The Limits of Society." Literature Resource Center. Gale, 1979. Web. 22 Mar. 2011.