A Critique on “Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality: Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies” The article “Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality: Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies”, written by Costas J. Efthimiou and Sohang Gandhi. The authors try to explain or prove that ghosts, vampires and zombies do not exist through scientific methods and explanations. The authors main argument to show that these claim are false, they say” we point out inconsistencies associated with the ghost, vampire, and zombie mythologies as portrayed in popular films and folklore and give practical explanations to some of their features” (Efthimiou and Gandhi “Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality: Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies”) Their argument is obvious that they will point out the …show more content…
In these days many people say that they have experienced with Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies and some people say that they have seen some, and they negotiate their thoughts with the people they know so the number of believers on these things has been rapidly increased. In another article titled “ Conspiracy Theories: why we believe the unbelievable”, written by Michael Shermer he talks about the reason of why many people make up some thoughts, which do not have enough evidence or do not related to what the reality says. He mentioned the JFK conspiracy saying” A poll this month found that 61% of Americans who responded still …show more content…
They describe it as “to a highly toxic substance called tetrodotoxin (TTX). In an article in New Scientist (2001), Bryan Furlow gives an overview of TTX’s effects blended with a headlining news story: Dodo, a former voodoo priest, confirms that the recipe used to make the drug for zombiefication includes a powder derived from the puffer fish” (Efthimiou and Gandhi “Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality: Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies”), basically they say that someone got poisoned with a powder foun in puffer fish known as Tetrodotoxin. This myth is all about this poison and how the person dies. They say that the poison makes the body functions suspended or in other words the body seems to be dead but it fact the person is still alive, but his body functions are suspended due to the poison effects. They conclude what is the reason of people turn into “zombie” that if someone is buried alive that lack of oxygen will damage the brain, which will lead to the death of this person. But if the person is unburied before he dies from suffocation, then it will make this person appears as a soulless creature “zombie”, and that is because of what this person has lost which is the thinking processes of the brain, because of the poison. So the authors did not prove it as false, because in this case, they might be some people who seemed to be “zombies” due to the poison effect, but they are not real zombies, they
Max Brooks explains in his article ‘’The Movies That Rose From The Grave’’ [2006], that zombies and the supernatural forces have impacted and have become popular in the world today. The first main idea that Brooks points out is the way society has changed the meaning and glimpse for the supernatural creatures like zombies causing them to become increasingly popular. To support this zombie movies have changed from darkness and mystery to violent and bloodier scenes therefore making them more prevailing. The second main idea that is discussed by Brooks is how the media has helped to increase the popularity of zombies, vampires, ghosts. Highlighted by the author particularity both ‘’resident evil,
became so prevalent in our modern society. Originally 'zombie' was a word to represent someone affected by a West African elixir that prompted the host
so. Many people believe other theories which is fine but there is no doubt that this is a conspiracy
The day that President Kennedy was assassinated, people started to view the world differently. His death was the first time that a conspiracy theory transformed into a conceivable form of knowledge among the general public. "It was because of Kennedy's death in Dallas that the conspiracy theory was born" (Wensley). It started with an article written ...
It is human nature to try and find the unseen hand in a crime. When calamity struck on November 22, 1963, the country began to search for the unseen hand in the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. The United States was completely taken under shock when news came to them that Kennedy had been shot in Dealey Plaza. 70% of Americans believe Kennedy was assassinated under some type of conspiracy. Few know the facts to what they believe, but most just believe, but most just believe as an escape route to the reality that a small man such as Lee Harvey Oswald can kill a man as big as John F. Kennedy. While people feel Lee Harvey was accompanied in the killing, the fact of the matter is that there is no evidence to prove Lee Harvey Oswald was part of a conspiracy.
Conspiracy hypotheses are extremely intriguing because they permit individuals to consider unheard of options and analysis with numerous fortuitous events, changing the way individuals see well know occasion and a few different parts in life as more than only a happenstance. Conspiracy can have a noteworthy effect on society that hence prompt musings changing the sentiment with respect to convictions. In any case, I for on trust that these speculations can induce individuals into thinking and believing anything, since anyone can unite any two arbitrary facts or things together, as long as they have something in like manner. In the Ted Talk show, the moderator additionally appears to demonstrate this
According to Peter Kor's third principle (2), such an extraordinary claim as being able to communicate with the dead makes us "question our understanding of ordinary events" and "such an extraordinary claim or view requires proportionate revision of conventional wisdom"(2). For example, if a friend in Florida calls to tell me that a polar bear was in his backyard, eating the wheel off his car but has since left, I should not simply accept this, because it questions what I already know to be fact. What I already know as fact in a situation like this is that 1) polar bears do not live in Florida because they are not comfortable in the heat, 2) polar bears certainly do not roam free in suburban areas, and 3) just because he said this happened doesn't make it real.
[There is a great possibility that ghosts do exist and nobody should be so quick to deny the idea. Simply because it hasn't been proven to every skeptic's liking is no good reason to say it isn't true. Open minds are the key to discovery. So, just as long as we remember that, nothing is impossible.]
In Hamlet and the Ghost Again by John D. Rea, the author gains credibility by implementing ethos and refuting other authors’ claims, essentially strengthening his own. Rea begins by asserting his claim that Hamlet’s belief in the authenticity of his father’s Ghost is questionable and proceeds to provide historical evidence along with strong analysis. By acknowlegding the numerous and redundant works published pertaining to Hamlet, the author strengthens his argument by suggesting that his article raises a new idea, intriguing the audience causing them to read more, further establishing his credibility. The author cites a leading scientist of the 17th century who maintains that apparitions and ghosts of the dead are not the souls of the dead,
In the field of philosophy, zombies are imaginary creatures that are used to illuminate problems regarding consciousness and its relation to the physical world. As compared to those in witchcraft or films, zombies are exactly like human beings in every physical aspect but without conscious experiences. However, zombies behave like humans and some of them even spend considerable amount of time discussing consciousness. While few people believe in the existence of zombies, many state that they are at least conceivable and some argue that they are possible. Consequently, there are arguments that if zombies are increasingly a bare possibility, then some kind of dualism is true and physicalism is false. This argument is the chief significance of the zombie idea for many philosophers though it also generates interest for pre-suppositions concerning the nature of consciousness as well as the relation between the physical and the phenomenal. In addition, the use of the zombie idea against physicalism generates more general questions regarding the link between conceivability, imaginability, and possibility. Generally, the zombie argument poses a problem of physicalism and attracted response from physicalists who attempt to defuse the problem.
In researching this and many other conspiracy theories, one can see many uses of sensationalism, mainly by the media. This media- the news (local and national), magazines, tabloids, television shows, movies, and so on- has a huge e...
As long as one can remember, paranormal beliefs have always existed in human society. They are living in every man’s childhood and in every corner of human’s life. From the burning belief about Santa Claus’s gifts under a Christmas’s tree in the morning to a scary game about Bloody Mary and her coming back from the dead, it seems that people cannot help but draw themselves to these stories. Even when these beliefs fade, there would be a new one that eventually shows up. No matter how much science has progressed, the belief in paranormal phenomena still remains in society. Eventually, the question about paranormal phenomena seems pale in comparison to the human’s undying belief about such things. It is really hard to pinpoint an exact cause for human’s belief in the paranormal for only one cause is not enough; however, it is sure that psychological, sociological, and biological factors play an enormous role that contributes to this belief.
Do not open your eyes! One thinks to themselves as you believe there is something or someone there. It is dark your breath getting heavier and heavier, faster and faster, shaking and slowly you open your eyes… No! The fear paralyzes you, something is there it is getting closer and suddenly Ah! Suspenseful right? Every once in a while we may get frightened at the supernatural events that occur to us, but we never stop to think about how it impacts our society. In the article “Vampires Never Die” by Guillermo Del Toro and Chuck Hogan they reveal their perspectives about why the supernatural is important in our society. The supernatural impacts our society by using the supernatural popularity to make profit, connecting the human desire to the unrealistic and using technology to keep individuals interested in the supernatural.
Many people in the world today believe in paranormal phenomenon such as apparitions, orbs, and even ghosts. This belief is rapidly increasing because of the popular ghost-themed websites, TV shows, books, and documentaries. Multiple ghost exposer’s text’s show supposed evidence that these things called ghosts are in fact real. Multiple ghost hunters in these texts use many devices, in particular electromagnetic ones, to help explain the reasoning behind the paranormal appearances; they explain that based upon Einstein’s laws of energy, ghosts can form from a dead person’s body because of the energy lost is then transported from the dead to a ghost. However, Benjamin Radford, a LiveScience contributor, in his article called “Do Einstein’s laws Prove Ghosts Exist,” claims that “ghosts cannot possibly evolve from electromagnetic energy” (Radford). Radford uses logical reasoning, credible
The theories of the window and frame had its origins in the schools of formalism and realism. Both schools main objective was to amplify the prestige of film. During that era of film was an upstart sideshow attraction, high class form of entertainment was the theater and the visual art forms of paintings and statues. Both schools saw cinema as a way of looking a through an aperture but keeping the audience at a distance from the subject on the screen. Whether looking through at frame or looking through a window the audience would be viewing the subject matter but they would only be able to absorb it. That’s where the similarities end the formalist lead by theorist Sergei Eisenstein saw film as frame and would create shock in an attempt to provoke or raise consciousness. Sergei Eisenstein would create what he wanted to the audience to see in his films. For example in the Battleship Potemkin Eisenstein wanted to address the situation with Russia and he created the situation in his film to incite a revolution by creating chaos. The realism school lead by André Bazin saw cinema as window. To Bazin a spectator would be apart of the film as more of a witness more than just a spectator. In the movie Rear Window Jefferies was witness to his neighbor wife murder while looking through window because while looking through a window what one sees is real.