Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of cognitive psychology essay
Emergence of cognitive psychology
Emergence of cognitive psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The history of cognitive psychology essay
Learning is Organized by Chunking (Herman Buschke 1976)
Name: Arash Zargar Balayejam
Metric: WEK110706
Course: Cognitive Science (WAES2107)
Dr. Unaizah Hanum Binti Obaidellah
Session 2013/2014 Semester 2
Introduction
Chunking is a term in psychology which discuss about the process of chunking and grouping series of items during a memory task performing. Human has a limited short term memory capacity in free recall task. Miller discussed that human can convert small list of items (such as words) to larger pieces of information such as sentences (chunks), and also make relation between them (Miller, 1956). This phenomenon helps human to memorize better in short term memory, for example, if a person is able to retrieve 5 to 8 items in natural free recall, in different retrieval trials can identify group of items that recur together, which could extend list of items to 20. Repeating trials of actual chunks and their organization in verbal learning shows that items are grouped in different smaller chunks.
Many experiments has been done on learning and chunking by various researchers from Tulving (1962) to Martin and Noreen (1974), but most of researches has be focused on retrieval free call demonstration and measuring the amount of organization. This paper has new viewpoint to the chunking and organization of chunks (Buschke, 1976). The idea is to identify the actual chunks in each trial of learning and to show what really happening during random free recall learning. In order to do that, Buschke show actual clusters on each attempt. The identification of chunks needs comparison of all available chunks in each trial. The experiment analyzed manually without using any computer program.
Methods
The method used is to present a ...
... middle of paper ...
...t the relative nature of chunks ordering, also retrieval after week delay stay the same as before and chunks organization after week is less than previous trials. Selecting a 12-years boy was wise decision, because at last the subject retrieved similar number of items that adults retrieved. This experiment finds that, it is possible that related items from same chunks presented in related style because of sequential nature of verbal free recall.
References
Buschke, H. (1976). Learning is organized by chunking. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 313–324.
CERMAK, G., SCHNORR, J., & BuscHKE, H. (1970). Word recognition as a function of spelling direction during study and test. Psychonomic Science, 127-128.
Miller, G. (1956). Psychological Review. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information, 81-97.
The World of Psychology. (2002). A Pearson Education Company. Boston, MA: Samuel Wood & Ellen Green Wood p. 593
Bibliography 3rd edition Psychology (Bernstein-Stewart, Roy, Srull, & Wickens) Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, Massachusetts 1994
According to Ben Zimmer, in “Chunking,” many people greatly benefited from lexical chunks of words more logically and realistically. Zimmer claimed that at an early age, commonly set of phrases were memory enhancer and it actually improvised our ability to proficiently remember these sets of information because it gets processed and stored in our brain as single units. However, Zimmer also emphasized that one well-known critic was not favorable of lexical chunking because overstressing scripted words were not as effective as learning English language the usual and conventional technique such as: ordinary vocabulary, correct punctuation and proper grammar. Nonetheless, he believed that lexical chunking had been making a very promising approach
The second stage of memory processing is storage. Aronson et al. (2013) defines storage as the process by which people store the information they just acquired. Unfortunately, memories are affected by incoming information through alteration or reconstruction. This phenomenon is referred to as recon...
Ebbinghaus’ work on memory performance contributed astonishing knowledge to the field of scientific psychology and enthralled several succeeding researchers and psychologists (Fuchs, 1997; Slamecka, 1985; Young, 1985). Ebbinghaus was precisely known for conducting memory experiments by using nonsense syllables, and from the results of those experiments, he postulated a unitary view of learning and memory. However, Endel Tulving, provided evidence from Ebbinghaus’ original research that there existed discernible kinds of learning and memory. Prior to his experiment, Tulving received some scathing criticism on his stance regarding Ebbinghaus’ research, but he averred that there was no intention to derogate its concept (Slamecka, 1985; Tulving, 1985). Rather, Tulving’s experiment emanated from Ebbinghaus’ original research to address implications that would supplement knowledge about the psychological science of memory.
Do you ever wonder how our brains can remember so many things? Our minds are a lot like computers “we can draw on our past experiences in order to use this information in the present” (Sternberg, 1999). “Memory is a group of related mental processes that are involved inacquiring, storing, and retrieving information” (Psychology, page 228). “We have 3 main stages of memory our sensory memory, short- term memory, and long term memory.” I will be stating some interesting facts about each one. Beginning with our sensory memory, one of the facts I found from the book was that “The very brief time information is held in our sensory memory you “select,” or pay attention to, just a few aspects of all the environmental information that’sbeing registered
...Baddeley (1966) study of encoding in the short term memory and long term memory supports the MSM model on the mode of processing such that words are processed on recall and both models share the same opinion that processing does influence recall. Finally, the MSM model of memory states that all information is stored in the long term memory, however, this interpretation contrasts with that of Baddeley (1974) who argue that we store different types of memories and it is unlikely that they occur only in the LTM store. Additionally, other theories have recognised different types of memories that we experience, therefore it is debatable that all these different memories occur only in the long-term memory as presumed by the multi-store model which states the long term memory store as with unlimited capacity, in addition it also fails to explain how we recall information.
Human memory is flexible and prone to suggestion. “Human memory, while remarkable in many ways, does not operate like a video camera” (Walker, 2013). In fact, human memory is quite the opposite of a video camera; it can be greatly influenced and even often distorted by interactions with its surroundings (Walker, 2013). Memory is separated into three different phases. The first phase is acquisition, which is when information is first entered into memory or the perception of an event (Samaha, 2011). The next phase is retention. Retention is the process of storing information during the period of time between the event and the recollection of a piece of information from that event (Samaha, 2011). The last stage is retrieval. Retrieval is recalling stored information about an event with the purpose of making an identification of a person in that event (Samaha, 2011).
Gall, S. B., Beins, B., & Feldman, A. (2001). The gale encyclopedia of psychology. (2nd ed., pp. 271-273). Detroit, MI: Gale Group.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Cognitive psychology (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers
Hewstone, M. Fincham, F. and Foster, J (2005). Psychology. Oxford: The British Psychological Society, and Blackwell Publishing. P3-23.
Current Directions in Psychological Science 15.5 (2006): 265-68. Print. The.
Rabinowitz, B., Siegel, Dr. S. & Spear., Dr. N. (2004). Class tapes: COCR958 The Science of Psychology.
Edited by Raymond J. Corsini. Encyclopedia of Psychology, Second Edition, Volume 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
In the Chunk, Chew and Check strategy, the input shows how students acquires new information. In acquiring new information, it is the duty of the teacher to help students effectively interact with new knowledge. Based on student needs, the teacher breaks the content into small chunks (i.e. digestible bites) of information that can be easily processed by students.