Chiquita Case Study

2112 Words5 Pages
1. “How would you characterize Chiquita’s historical approach to global management?” For Chiquita, historically the organization appeared to prefer a profoundly centralized, a ethnocentric method for global management, with a heavy focus on profitableness. Moreover, there was limited if any hiring of the committee staff from the local workforce within Latin America. The corporation favored transplanting their crew to administer orders. There was not a valid application of a group of advisers, but the corporate level managers whom could be categorized as extremely tight-lipped and mysterious. Not one person on the upper plane of the firm was considered accountable for the base levels of the operation. This course may have occurred internally…show more content…
Chiquita 's corporate responsibility (CR) program is no exception and indeed creates conflict between the stakeholders and the shareholders. That is natural when a corporation takes new action of any type. In this case, an ethical action is being placed in the interest of stakeholders. Explaining this to shareholders is important which displays a new transparency attitude of being upfront with how the company is trying to do good to their stakeholders. It is part of balancing the two sides of the conflict. Chiquita 's proposal originates by the organization 's latest four distinctive marks: integrity, respect, opportunity, and responsibility. The firm integrated external standards in their program, including Social Accountability (SA) 8000, along with the company 's "Better Banana Project Principle of Fair Treatment and Good Conditions for Workers." Since countries like Latin America signify below the ethical measures as the standards found within the U.S., accommodating SA8000 standards enables Chiquita to raise the bar on food safety, which is important to prevent sickness, labor standards to support human rights, and employee health and safety for
Open Document