Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
globalization processes
globalization as a process
ASPECT OF GLOBALIZATION
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: globalization processes
The business world of the United States of America has gone to many lengths to become as profitable as they are presently. Since after the Great Depression, numbers in favor of the United States have skyrocketed. According to the United Nation’s list of countries sorted by their gross domestic product, the United States stands as the number one in economic value. Something to consider though is if all credit should be given to the states and their hard workers alone. As seen on the CIA World Factbook, the country of China is responsible for 19% of the countries imports; but who knows if those people are actually benefitting from the success America has brought unto them. The truth of the matter is that they haven’t. Arise of international trade and other parts relating to America’s globalization is nothing of a glamorous story. The products brought to the consumers by one of the biggest import countries over the last three centuries or so are being produced in an environment far more painful than anyone wants to even consider. These factories that companies, one major corporation being Wal-Mart, are trying to impede from becoming general knowledge, is the use of Chinese sweat shops. In China people are being brought into these sweat shops where it may often be found having disgusting working conditions, little to no benefits for their employees, as well as the abuse and misuse of small children. Upon entering a corporate office for Wal-Mart in a large city, expectations of cleanliness, amongst any other appreciated, well kept up ideas of a professional office would be expected; upon entering a building found in China, one wouldn’t expect the same to say the least. According to the Huffington Post “16 and 17 year olds work 15 hour... ... middle of paper ... ...roversies. Facts On File News Services, 7 Mar. 1997. Web. 27 May 2014. "Microsoft to Investigate Conditions in Chinese Plant." Huffington Post: Tech. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc., 15 Apr. 2010. Web. 24 May 2014. Miller, Daniel. "Appalling Conditions of Factory Workers Who Make Dell Computers Who Are Forced to Work Seven-day, 74-hour Weeks and Live in Dorms With No Hot Water." Mail Online. Associated Newspapers, 08 Nov. 2013. Web. 25 May 2014. Paul Feine. McBastards: McDonald’s and Globalization. 2011. Envision in Depth: Reading, Writing, and Researching Arguments. By Christine L. Alfaro and Alyssa J. O’Brien. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson/Longman, 2011. 372-76. Print. "Sweatshops in China." ProQuest: Asian Business. Dow Jones & Company Inc, 14 Feb. 2012. Web. 25 May 2014. "Sweatshop Labor." Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 15 July 2013. Web. 27 May 2014.
The controversial issue of sweatshops is one often over looked by The United States. In the Social Issues Encyclopedia, entry # 167, Matt Zwolinski tackles the issues of sweatshops. In this article Matt raises a question I have not been able to get out of my head since I have begun researching this topic, “ are companies who contract with sweatshops doing anything wrong?” this article goes on to argue that the people who work in the sweatshops willingly choose to work there, despite the poor environment. Many people in third world countries depend on the sweatshops to earn what they can to have any hopes of surviving. If the sweatshops were to shut down many people would lose their jobs, and therefore have no source of income. This may lead people to steal and prostitution as well. this article is suggesting that sweatshops will better the economy by giving people a better job than what they may have had. Due to this the companies contracting with sweatshops are not acting wrong in any way. This was a deductive article it had a lot of good examples to show how sweatshops are beneficial to third world countries. Radly Balko seemed to have the same view point as Matt Zwolinski. Many people believe the richer countries should not support the sweatshops Balko believes if people stopped buying products made in sweatshops the companies will have to shut down and relocate, firing all of the present workers. Rasing the fact that again the worker will have no source of income, the workers need the sweatshop to survive. Balko also uses the argument that the workers willingly work in the current environments.
In port cities of China, leaflets distributed by labor brokers said, “Americans are very rich people. They want the Chinamen to come and make him very welcome. There you will have great pay, large houses, and good clothing of the finest description. Money is in great plenty and to spare in America.”
"Sweatshops." Green America's Ending Program: What You Can Do. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2013.
...e their product. Sweatshops are found usually all over the world and need to make a better decision as in more labor laws, fair wages, and safety standards to better the workers' conditions. It should benefit the mutually experiences by both the employers and the employees. Most important is the need to be educated about their rights and including local labor laws.
The belief that the archaic-like prisons known as sweatshops have been abolished, has been proven false. They do, in fact, exist in not only foreign countries but also in America. The abuse of human rights is demonstrated as more than half the 22, 000 garment contractors in the United States don't pay workers minimum wage, according to the Labor Department, and working conditions are deplorable...Americans were horrified to learn last August of 72 Thai laborers imprisoned in El Monte, Near Los Angeles, who were forced to work up to 22 hours a day, seven days a week at $1.60 an hour" (Yeh).
The General Accountability Office defines a sweatshop as a “multiple labor law violator.” A sweatshop violates laws pertaining to benefits, working hours, and wages (“Toxic Uniforms”). To make more money, companies move their sweatshop factories to different locations and try to find the cheapest locations with the least regulations (“Sweatshops”). There are not as many sweatshop factories in the United States because the industries have been transferred overseas where the labor is cheaper and there are weaker regulations. In the United States, sweatshops are hidden from the public, with poor immigrant workers who are unable to speak out against the injustices (“Subsidizing Sweatshops”). Workers in sweatshops are forced to work overtime, earn below a living wage, do not earn benefits, and encounter verbal, physical and sexual abuse. Macy’s, JCPenney, Kohl’s, The
Heffernan, Margaret. "What happened after the Foxconn suicides." CBS Money Watch . (2013): n. page. Web. 16 Sep. 2013. .
Sweatshops are considered to be a thing in the past, but the truth is they are more common than people would think. Many companies use sweatshops as a way to produce more products for little money. To some companies, their labels have become more of a priority than the workers who made it all possible.
Sweatshops are factories that violate two or more human rights. Sweatshops are known in the media and politically as dangerous places for workers to work in and are infamous for paying minimum wages for long hours of labour. The first source is a quote that states that Nike has helped improve Vietnamese’s’ workers lives by helping them be able to afford luxuries they did not have access to before such as scooters, bicycles and even cars. The source is showing sweatshops in a positive light stating how before sweatshops were established in developing countries, Vietnamese citizens were very poor and underprivileged. The source continues to say that the moment when sweatshops came to Vietnam, workers started to get more profit and their lives eventually went uphill from their due to being able to afford more necessities and luxuries; one of them being a vehicle, which makes their commute to work much faster which in turn increases their quality of life. The source demonstrates this point by mentioning that this is all due to globalization. Because of globalization, multinationals are able to make investments in developing countries which in turn offers the sweatshops and the employees better technology, better working skills and an improvement in their education which overall helps raise the sweatshops’ productivity which results in an increase
Although many U.S. citizens do not know or do not believe that the U.S. has sweatshops, they do exist, many are in New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles (Background on Sweatshops). Sweatshops grew in popularity during the Industrial Revolution because farmers left their land to acquire new jobs in factories (Sweatshops). The global economy should not depend on sweatshops, instead developed nations that obtain services from overseas sweatshops should improve the working conditions and provide a living wage for their workers. II. Background History Due to the large increase of immigrants in the United States in the 1800s, sweatshops started to develop in the East Coast cities.
Many people in our society today are constantly asking, "Why do sweatshops exist?" The answer to this question is that companies like Nike and Wal-Mart use sweatshops to produce their goods for a much cheaper rate, to reduce the cost of their products. The problem with sweatshops is that the workers are subject to hard work in often times poor conditions for minimal pay. But although many people may condemn sweatshops, there are some advantages that many people overlook when arguing against sweatshops and their practices.
are a major cause for jobs becoming outsourced. The outsourcing of jobs can greatly impact a nation, just like it did in America. The size of the U.S.work force has been reduced due to Chinese factory workers because they were the cheapest labor force and could work longer hours for a smaller pay. No wonder as I grew up I observed the items I was using, very few said, “Made in America”, because most said “Made in China”. It is now seems clear that there is an economic incentive for companies and corporations to produce toys for children, clothing, sneakers, technology in China and other foreign Asian
Sweatshop is a term for makeshift factories where poverty-stricken people- mostly women and children- work at top speed for 12 or more hours a day in an effort to earn a living wage (library). Often called the sweating system, which began when the factory system developed in the early 1800’s. Factories were not always large enough to house all the workers, instead the owners would sublet contracts for part of the work. Then the other subcontractors set up makeshift factories in dimly lighted, poorly ventilated buildings. They hired workers for low wages and long hours on a work when needed basis. Americans began to object to this almost right away, as early as the 1830’s. In 1880, large numbers of immigrants began to come to America, and the problem became serious. The owners of sweatshops took advantage of the immigrants’ ignorance and poverty to get them to work for low wages. During the 1900’s, many states began to pass laws prohibiting products from being manufactured under sweatshop conditions. A fire at the Triangle Shirtwaist Company in 1911, in which 146 women died, urged many states to pass anti-sweatshop laws. States then began passing laws on wages, hours, child labor, making it impractical for factories to sublet work. Sweatshops became illegal in most countries. But not all, such as Asia and Africa, the less developed countries .
Comparison of American and Chinese Cultures Cultural differences are apparent from one group of people to another. Culture is based on many things that are passed on from one generation to the next. Most of the time, people take for granted their language, beliefs, and values. When it comes to the cultural differences of people, there is no right or wrong. People should be aware of others culture and respect the differences that exist between them.
Vignali, C. (2001). McDonald’s: “think global, act local”--the marketing mix. British Food Journal, 103(2), pp.97--111.