Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Child labour early 1800's
Child labour early 1800's
Challenges faced by immigrants in canada
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child labour early 1800's
In a modern society that views childhood as not only an important part of one’s life but as a fundamental growing stage, the idea of child labour has taken on a severely negative connotation; so much so that as consumers we attempt to remove ourselves from any countries that associate with this practice. However Canada during the late 19th and early 20th century used child labour as a major workforce and had 80’000 immigrant child workers migrating to Canada largely from Great Britain. The development and use of child labour during the 19th and early 20th century was a manifestation of the need for children to economically support their families, however it was the availability of children from mass rises in British immigration, supplemented …show more content…
This was of course a transitionary measure and at the age of eight they would be gradually introduced to work in paper routes or farm tasks. These represented some of the smaller task which children took part in, as Boys In The Pits by McIntosh discovers, however numerous children were also being used in coal mines especially in regions such as Nova Scotia, These boys were exposed to numerous hazards such as collapsing mine shafts or dangerous gases, essentially the same dangers that any adult coal miner would face, this philosophy of treating children like adults was a common societal view they were even referred to by School Board Inspectors as “There were no children among the poor, only labour” and by visitors as “Labouring boys and girls… were treated like men” . This trade was particularly popular as it allowed for mines to cut costs by using a younger labour force, which they could pay drastically less than an adult worker. Moreover these children could be trained from a very young age and then transitioned directly into the adult labour force without the need for further training. Adults bringing their sons to the pits as a type of apprenticeship accomplished this process and allowed for the family to …show more content…
During this time period several government policies were put in place to attempt to remove children from the workforce, these included removing children from position such as mining or dangerous manufacturing, these acts were very weak and were rarely enforced. This lack of control lead to a continuation of the use of children as a form of labour and had relatively little to no effect as children as young as 7 years old were still working in different capacities. It was not until 1933 that new laws come into existence that have any effect, these were mostly laws involving age, preventing children under the age of 14 – 16 depending on the province to take part in any form work. Further laws preventing certain types of work for different ages also became prevalent such as mine workers having to be a minimum of 18 years old and any work involving machinery had to be at least 16. Unfortunately these laws did not prevent the constant loss of lives and injuries during this time period. These injuries based on periodicals and government surveys seem to have been very frequent and seemingly unresolved after the effect. The Royal Commissions Survey displays these numbers with nearly all the cases they encounter
For the first time in history children were an important factor of the economic system, but at a terrible price. The master of the factories employed children for two reasons. One, because of their small body which can get inside the machines to clean it and use their nimble fingers. Second, the masters use to pay low wages to the children who could be easily manipulated. The average age for the parents to send their children to work was ten. Although, Conventional wisdom dictates that the age at which children started work was connected to the poverty of the family. Griffith presents two autobiographies to put across her point. Autobiography of Edward Davis who lacked even the basic necessities of life because of his father’s heavy drinking habit and was forced to join work at a small age of six, whereas the memoir of Richard Boswell tells the opposite. He was raised up in an affluent family who studied in a boarding school. He was taken out of school at the age of thirteen to become a draper’s apprentice. The author goes further and places child employees into three groups, according to the kind of jobs that were available in their neighbourhood. First group composed of children living in rural areas with no domestic industry to work in. Therefore, the average of a child to work in rural area was ten. Before that, farmers use to assign small jobs to the children such as scaring birds, keeping sheep
Parr, J. & Janovicek, N. (2003). Histories of Canadian Children and Youth. Canada: Oxford University Press.
Parr, J. (1994). Labouring children: British immigrant apprentices to Canada, 1869-1924. (pp. 11-141). Toronto, PQ: University of Toronto Press.
In the analysis of Juvenile immigration in Canada, Doyle’s (1875) analysis presents Miss Rye and Miss Macpherson’s account of the poor treatment and lack of authoritative supervision of immigrant children in Canada in the early 1870s. In this manner, the women were only allowed to be agents for the adoption of children into work houses or by farmer family’s that would raise the child in exchange for farm labor: “For the disposal of a large proportion of the girls, both Miss Macpherson and Miss Rye depend upon what they term "adoption." (Doyle, 1875, p.11). This highly exploitative method of using immigrant children as low wage works defines the unregulated system of adoption, which placed certain children in homes that were not being supervised by a government agency or a higher authority. This part of Doyle’s (1875) report exposes the problem of non-supervision of children by the government, which left certain children exposed to abuse, abandonment, and physical harm. However, Doyle (1875) only relies on the Miss Rye and Miss Macpherson as the only witnesses to the abuse that these children endured in this unregulated system of “adoption”. This small sample size in the case study defines the extremely narrow
In the agricultural industry the children would harvest crops and sewing. If the children were working in the mining industry it was very dangerous. The conditions were very poor, it was very dirty and not pleasant. The boys were called “Breaker Boys” they broke down raw coal into different pieces for certain furnaces. The coal bearers would carry coal on their shoulders, and the smallest children worked as trappers, they would open trap doors in the mines to move the coal. As for the manufacturing industry, the children would work in dark and dirty conditions. They worked around sharp tools and and machines, which caused a lot of injuries to them.
"Child Labor during the British Industrial Revolution." EHnet. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Dec. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .
Many factories and mines hired children, because they were able to fit in smaller spaces and the factories could pay them less. They also hired children, because children were easier to control. During this time it was just common for kids to work; most people were okay with child labor at the time. “In colonial America, child labor was not a subject of controversy. It was an integral part of the agricultural and handicraft economy. Children not only worked on the family farm but were often hired out to other farmers
Throughout time children have worked myriad hours in hazardous workplaces in order to make a few cents to a few dollars. This is known as child labor, where children are risking their lives daily for money. Today child labor continues to exist all over the world and even in the United States where children pick fruits and vegetables in difficult conditions. According to the article, “What is Child Labor”; it states that roughly 215 million children around the world are working between the ages of 5 and 17 in harmful workplaces. Child labor continues to exist because many families live in poverty and with more working hands there is an increase in income. Other families take their children to work in the fields because they have no access to childcare and extra money is beneficial to buy basic needs. Although there are laws and regulations that protect children from child labor, stronger enforcement is required because child labor not only exploits children but also has detrimental effects on a child’s health, education, and the people of the nation.
Within months of the arrival of the early settlers on American soil, they were faced with the bitter cold of winter. These settlers were unprepared for winter. They were still in the process of building their houses, they had not gathered enough food to survive through the season, and they had no means of keeping warm during these dangerous months. Many of the early settlers died during these harsh cold months. With so many dead the use of child labor was necessary to survive for the colonist. In American history, this is often the case. In extreme times, when parents are unable to provide for their children on their own, the use of child labor is often
Northern Capitalists used money to invest in trade and industry for profit, and with such industrialization occurring, and the mass immigration, it caused a surplus of jobs but ‘All that glitters is not gold.’ With immigration it gave Northern Capitalists a chance to lower workers’ wages for the same amount of work done. Children usually sold newspapers or flowers, shined shoes, delivered messages, or picked up odd jobs. Children found jobs...
Many businesses and factories hired children because they were easier to exploit; they could be paid less for more work in dangerous conditions. Plus, their small size made many children idea for working with small parts or fitting into small spaces. Children as young as four could be found working in factories, though most were between eight and twelve. Despite the economic gains made by the business that employed them, many children suffered in the workplace. The industrial setting caused many health problems for the children that, if they lived long enough, they would carry with them for the rest of their lives. Children were also more likely to face accidents in the workplace, often caused by fatigue, and many were seriously injured or killed. Despite efforts by reformers to regulate child labor, it wasn’t until the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that children under 14 were prohibited from
According to the article “A History of Child Labor” reviewed by Milton Fried, a child could work as long as six days a week for up to 18 hours a day, and only make a dollar a week. Child labor was nothing but cheap labor. The big companies loved cheap labor because then they could make an item for not very much money, and make a huge profit margin. Fried continues to state how cheap the labor was, “One glass factory in Massachusetts was fenced with barbed wire ‘to keep the young imps inside.’ These were boys under 12 who carried loads of hot glass all night for a wage of 40 cents to $1.10 per night.” Unlike, children today who are in bed sleeping by 8 pm each night, these children had to stay up all night working to make just enough income for their families. Sadly, the children had no choice but to work for very little pay. Their mothers and fathers made so little money in the factory system that they couldn’t afford to let their children enjoy their childhood: “Other working children were indentured—their parents sold their labor to the mill owner for a period of years. Others lived with their families and worked for wages as adults did, for long hours and under hard conditions” (Cleland). The child had no other choice, but to work for these big
Imagine waking up at five in the morning to walk over a mile to a factory where you work until noon where you get a half hour break for lunch, then it’s back to work until nine or ten at night, when you are finally allowed to go home and you are only eight years old. Today that seems unimaginable, but during the early 19th century it was the everyday life of thousands of children whose ages range from as young as five until you died. During the Industrial Revolution many children were required to work dangerous jobs to help their families.
Factory and mine owners exploited the situation by offering families a means to make more money, by putting their children to work. Industry profited from this arrangement by saving money, since child labor was more “cost effective”. According to one historian, Clark Nardinelli, “in 1835 56,000 children under the age of thirteen were working in textile factories alone. By 1874, the number of child laborers in the market hit its peak with over 122,000 children between the ages of 10 and thirteen working in textile factories (4).” ... ...
So I believe that the issue of child labour is not simple. As Unicef’s 1997 State of the World’s Children Report argued, children’s work needs to be seen as having two extremes. On one hand, there is the destructive or exploitative work and, on the other hand, there is beneficial work - promoting or enhancing children’s development without interfering with their schooling, recreation and rest. ‘And between these two poles are vast areas of work that need not negatively affect a child’s development.’ My firm belief is that there is a difference between child labour and child work and that in both cases the issue is whether or not the child is deliberately being exploited.