preview

Chernobyl Case Study

explanatory Essay
1188 words
1188 words
bookmark

The Chernobyl nuclear accident was an accident that had many repercussions and caused many to doubt nuclear power across the world. Chernobyl was caused by many events that lead to the eventually melt down of one of the reactors. There have been many studies on why the Chernobyl nuclear power plant melted down. Some say it was from design flaws with the RBMK reactor. Others say it was due to lack of employee training and lack of knowledge on how to safely and properly run the plant. And also it may have been because there was a lack of safety measures implemented and those that were, were not properly followed. What ever it was that caused the accident, all of thoughts on why the reactor exploded, tie into the three engineering accident …show more content…

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the chernobyl nuclear accident had many repercussions and caused many to doubt nuclear power across the world.
  • Explains that the soviet union was on the verge of collapsing. high officials were not willing to share information with many workers of their companies.
  • Explains that an hro stands for high reliability organization. they believe that failure will not happen in the right environment and situation.
  • Opines that most nuclear power plants are considered to be hro because of their relatively dangerous nature and if there is a problem it tends to not be small one. the reactor in chernobyl was not an 'hro' because at the time the soviet government did not properly train their employees.
  • Explains the second kind of accident theory called the natural accident theory (nat). the nat believes that there is no way to avoid accidents and the accidents are evident.
  • Explains that the nat applies very closely to the chernobyl accident, stating that there is no question whether or not there will be an accident.
  • Explains the social-technical theory, which tries to describe the accident by using all variables as possible cause of failure.
  • Explains that many workers at chernobyl were overworked and forced to work hours away from their families. there was also a lack of safety culture in the soviet union.
  • Explains that the chernobyl reactor blew up due to a lack of specialization and safety protocol. the soviet union collapsed after the disaster.

The reactor in Chernobyl was not an HRO because at the time the Soviet Government did not properly train their employees 'to operate a very complex and tightly coupled reactor design like the RBMK was. Had the Soviet government been more willing too share their knowledge with their employees and had their company been more of an HRO the explosion and the meltdown of Chernobyl could have been prevented or at least the outcome could have been drastically reduced, and many lives could have been saved. The second kind of accident theory is called the Natural Accident Theory (NAT). The NAT believes that there is no way to avoid accidents and the accidents are evident. Natural Accident has the ideology of a pessimist, their thoughts is that there is no way to prevent the worst from happening even is the right people working in the right environment accidents are going to happen. The only thing that the NAT believe to be able to control is the impact of the disaster that is evident and how to prevent human loss of …show more content…

This theory is the most complex of the three, but is also fairly simple. The Social- Technical theory tries to describe the accident by using all variables as possible cause of failure. This theory looks into the design of the product, how the product I intended to be used and how the workers are trained to use it, but also the actual implementation of the product. Also this type of accident theory looks into the social aspect of the work environment. Looking into the employees ' motivation such as, whether the workers are overworked and tired if they 're busy with other tasks and are unable to focus solely on the task at hand, also a possibility is if the worker has distractions outside of work at home, and finally it could also look into if the worker actually is properly trained and is proficient and knowledgeable about what they are doing. Along with analyzing all the other aspects Social- Technical also looks at the design process the methods used to produce the product, the materials used in the process, and finally the regulations behind the production of the

Get Access