Charlotte Alter's Argument

808 Words2 Pages

The Problem with the Argument
Charlotte Alter, a writer for TIME Magazine, published the article, The Problem With Pit Bulls, which speculated that pit bulls needed to be sterilized because they were dangerous and aggressive. Alter’s argument was one example of the unjust discrimination against pit bulls that caused several people to fear the breed. Alter’s argument started with an anecdote about a three year old girl, who had been attacked by a pit bull, who got kicked out of KFC due to the “disruption” that her battered face caused. The story was later proven to be a hoax. The article then focused on the reasons and statistics of pit bulls’ violent nature. Although Alter’s argument had numerous sources to support her claims, her argument is ineffective and flawed due to her use of polarization, bias, and oversimplification.
Alter’s (2014) argument was based on a polarized view of pit …show more content…

Although sterilization could be beneficial in some ways, there were several complications. Studies showed that sterilization could cause tumors, cancers, behavioral issues, canine cruciate ligament (CCL) injuries, and several other diseases. There were numerous factors which affected the extent of the risks, including sex, age in which the procedure was performed, and the size of the dog (Thornton, 2008). It had also been proven that “not all behaviours are affected by gonadectomy [early neutering]. Those most commonly affected are sexually dimorphic behaviours… [and] aggression may or may not be affected” (Kustritz). Sterilization of animals could not only be detrimental to their health, but could also be ineffective in fixing the aggression that Alter hopes to eliminate. Alter did not offer another solution to combat the “issue” with pit bulls. The oversimplification of the solution caused some individuals to question whether there was truly a problem that needed

Open Document