Charles Dickens' Hard Times

1104 Words3 Pages

Charles Dickens' Hard Times

There are a huge variety of characters in Hard Times, ranging from the

good to the unnaturally cruel. The novel is full of extremity in its

characterisation; cruel, bitter and selfish characters such as Mrs.

Sparsit contrast dramatically with characters such as Stephen

Blackpool and Rachael, who are benevolent and altruistic. Among the

cruellest and most villainous characters in the novel is James

Harthouse, who is completely ammoral, and therefore rendered very

dangerous by Dickens. Josiah Bounderby, is another particularly cruel

character. He is utterly self-centred and prejudiced against the

working-class of the novel (he categorizes them all as being greedy

and materialistic:

"You [Stephen] don't expect to be set up in a coach and

six, and to be fed on turtle soup and venison, with a

gold spoon as a good many of 'em do!")

Bounderby is almost a caricature and is satirised by Dickens for his

constant emphasizing of his climb to success, after supposedly

beginning his life in a ditch. Both Bounderby and Harthouse contrast

with the honourable characters of the novel, who are venerated by

Dickens.

Stephen Blackpool is the character who, it could be argued appears

'too good to be true'. We are initially introduced to Stephen as being

someone who has had a hard, unfair life. A representation of the

working-class known collectively as the 'Hands', Stephen has suffered

a life of hardship, both in his work and in his marriage to an

unfaithful drunkard. It is somewhat shocking then, when we first meet

Stephen, that he is immediately portrayed as a kind, complacent man,

who seems to show no hostility towards Mr. Bounberby or resentment

towards the social system which has de...

... middle of paper ...

..., who is clearly reluctant,

has been forced into a marriage by the expectations of the same society.

Some characters in the novel are often sentimentalized and therefore

sometimes do not seem believable. However, the novel is ultimately a

satirical one, which is meant to make a point, and it is perhaps

therefore more fitting that the 'good' characters are slightly

exaggerated, in order to emphasize the dishonourable characteristics

of people such as Harthouse. They are a kind of rebellion against the

monotony of the utilitarian system, and Dickens uses them as an

example. He uses Stephen in particular to promote character and

integrity over learning. The good characters are not necessarily meant

to be a naturalistic rendition of human personalities, but are instead

use to provide the novel with interest in the form of contrasting

attitudes and beliefs.

Open Document