Throughout week four we were introduced to many factors among individual differences in learning. One aspect in this week’s topic I felt most drawn to was students who are suspected and/ or diagnosed as gifted and talented. Before now giftedness was not something I gave a lot thought to in regards to my future as a teacher in a classroom, however I now understand the importance of recognizing it in the classroom.
Another strength is the accelerated path that campus teachers enjoy promoting for these students. All of the Gifted and Talented students are on grade level but they love the experience of trying out the next grade level. Although they are not aware of the benefits this will provide them the teachers know that by gently 'pushing' them forward the future rewards are great. On a personal note, watching students grow in this program has been a blessing. It is so exciting to watch children investigate and have knowledgeable dialogue on a subject that only the teacher is supposed to know about. This program promotes self-esteem, confidence, and self-worth. These students know that knowledge cannot be taken away from them and they love it.
that achievement motivation is determined by a range of both personal and social contextual factors, (Dai Y.D 1998) . Emirick (1992) asserts that gifted students often turn their intellectual energy to other activities that are outside the schools curriculum and often they not not perceive school work as a central part of their education, as they find what is being taught irrelevant, this is apparent in John Doe’s case as he believes that reading his own material and not handing in work is more important than what is being taught in class. Therefore we can assume that John Doe feels unchallenged in the classroom and is unmotivated to learn as his cognitive ability is well above the curriculum standards.
Multiple intelligences can give educators a variety of different ways to instruct. Thus, helping to provide students an opportunity to meet their own special needs and increase their proficiency and development. According to Thomas Armstrong "MI theory essentially encompasses what good teachers have always done in their teaching: reaching beyond the text and the blackboard to awaken students' minds" (p. 56).
By almost any measure, the education system in the United States is broken. This issue has been approached from many angles. From politicians to academic researchers, education has been a pressing topic for decades and one for which no viable ideas have been forthcoming. Most often, the solutions offered have involved standardized testing or pouring more money into a system that is fundamentally unworkable. The essential issue is that traditional approaches to teaching and learning have become outdated for today’s student body and for modern culture. Adopting a more progressive approach to the classroom is the best way to transform the education system. The theory of Multiple Intelligences (MI), first introduced by Howard Gardner three decades ago, is an example of a project-based learning style of teaching and assessment (Barron & Darling-Hammond, 2008). It is comprised of nine different “intelligences,” or ways that students learn, and it offers a more comprehensive way to determine an individual student’s intellect (Gardner, 2011). “Only if we expand and reformulate our view of what counts as human intellect will we be able to devise more appropriate ways of assessing it and more effective ways of educating it” (Gardner, 2011, p. 4). Using MI to help evaluate each student’s aptitude will help reach more students, and better prepare them for the world outside the classroom by: emphasizing cultural diversity, teaching real-world skills, empowering students, and bolstering the self-worth of individual students.
First, however, one must have a clear notion of what is meant by giftedness. Only the top 2-5 % of children in the world are truly gifted. These children are precocious, self-instructing, can intuit solutions without resorting to logical, linear steps, and have an incredible interest in an area or more that they focus so intently on, that they may lose sense of the outside world (3). Early reading and development of abstract thought are typical characteristics as well. The acceleration of ment...
One of the most controversial things about gifted and talented education is the criterion educators use to identify the gifted and talented. In the past, a student’s intelligence, based on an I.Q. score, was considered the best way to determine whether or not they qualified as gifted. As a result of using this method of identification, many gifted and talented students are not discovered nor are they placed in the appropriate programs to develop their abilities. Talents in the arts or an excellent ability to write are not measured on an I.Q. test but are abilities that may certainly qualify a student as gifted or talented.
Rimm states, that “being intellectually or creatively gifted does not assure educational or creative success or productivity. There are risks and pressures that…detour potentially high-achieving children (Colangelo & Davis, 2003, p. 424).” Both authors agree that the risks and pressures that may result in underachievement include the pressure to achieve and feelings of inadequacy when goals are not attained (Emerick, 1992, p. 140). As negative experiences continue, both Rimm and Emerick agree that a poor attitude toward school and they no longer are in control over their academic future (Colangelo & Davis, 2003, p. 425, Emerick, 1992, p. 140). Due to the fact that their intelligence may no longer be evident, they are often times unrecognized or denied appropriate educational services. (Colangelo & Davis, 2003, p. 425, Emerick, 1992, p. 140).
A growth mindset is something that is essential to both students and teachers. Without a growth mindset, students would have no motivation to learn and teachers would have no way to push their students further. In her article, “Even Geniuses”, Carol S. Dweck addresses how to instill a growth mindset in students and teachers. Similarily, Eduardo Brieceno shares the same information that Dweck wrote in his TED Talk “The Power of Belief- Mindset and Success”. In conjunction, both the article and the video present interesting material that teaches the reader about teaching with a growth mindset and learning with a growth mindset, all while being applicable to a real life math class.
Matthews, D., & Kitchen, J. (2007). Allowing Idiosyncratic Learners to Thrive: Policy Implications of a Study of School-Within-a-School Gifted Programs. Journal of School Choice, 27-52.