Mary Gaitskill Tiny Smiling Daddy

1976 Words4 Pages

Mary Gaitskill uses a third person perspective, along with crafty diction and insightful allusions to keep her reader’s in suspense through her piece of “Tiny, Smiling Daddy”. It is with these tools that Gaitskill is able to slowly change our perceptions of the narrator from likeable to confusion and ultimately ending in dislike.
“Tiny, Smiling Daddy” is told in the third person limited point of view through the father, Stew. This point of view is vital to our understanding of events, in that the progression of the story evolves only through Stew’s recollection of memories giving a very limited perspective. Using this style of writing puts a lens, so to speak, on how the reader is going to read the story, there are no outside details from …show more content…

First she establishes the common ground then on page 230, she drops a bomb on the reader “she knew how ashamed he had been when, at sixteen, she announced that she was lesbian”. Up until this point all Stew told us, was she was a sweet child and a horrible teenager, in this small sentence the reader finds out Stew is ashamed of his daughter, not for her being a reckless teenager, but only simply because she is a lesbian thus taking away some of the sympathy we once had for Stew; making the reader a bit more confused on how to feel towards him. It is at this point in the story that the memories become two-sided now, is Kitty really a bad daughter or is Stew just overreacting. As readers we question, why he is still blaming her if it is his intolerance for her that drove them apart, it is because of Stew’s denial. The idea of denial is a common tool used by Gaitskill to develop her characters, Graff says that her “narrators despise the idea of self-review, even while groping their way through memory toward some sense of responsibility”. This is what Gaitskill does with Stew, she has him repress the very reason the relationship has gone a-rye, thus the sympathy for Stew starts to disappear, and we begin to dislike Stew as a character. Along with transitions, Gaitskill also uses allusions help us understand the progression of the story as well as the true meaning behind the …show more content…

The opera La Boheme is, according to the Metropolitan Opera, a story about two people, Mimi and Rodolfo who fall in love. However, Rodolfo no longer wants to be with Mimi and they part ways, but the twist is Mimi is secretly suffering from an illness that she has not told him about. Rodolfo is able to see her one last time before she dies, and he is ultimately consumed by immense guilt for letting her go. The guilt Rodolfo felt is the connection Gaitskill uses to foreshadow the guilt that Stew will feel later on in the story because she only mentions the final act of the opera, when Rodolfo feels guilty. The key is to this allusion however, is when Gaitskill uses it; the reference is first used following the paragraph right after Gaitskill first tells us the daughter is a lesbian(230). This is important because up until this point, the reader only knows that Kitty is a horrible daughter, but waiting until the third page to inform us she is a lesbian changes the whole dynamic of the story. Should the reader feel sorry towards Stew anymore, is it because of Stew’s view on homosexuals that caused the rift between them, these questions enter the reader’s thoughts and paralleling these thoughts with the sudden reference of La Boheme in the final act, when Mimi’s illness is revealed and Rodolfo feels his guilt, gives another clue that the whole truth hasn’t been revealed yet. Later the reference is brought up again but

Open Document