Character Analysis: King Of Torts

627 Words2 Pages

The character that changed the most in the novel King of Torts is clay carter. Who is a public defender working at a very busy law office in Washington D.C. In the beginning of the novel Clay carter just wrapped up a three year long case that he lost and only makes enough to survive. Clay gets assigned to another case that looks hopeless for him and his defendant. I believe that clay has changed throughout this novel because he started with nothing and was so humble. He then started up his own company and was making an enormous amount of money and then got to greedy and lost everything.

6.) The end of the novel King of Torts was very unexpected. The plot itself kept going up and down. The ending was surprising but no very effective, after clay lost his law office due to being sued for malpractice, he was being investigated by the FBI due to alleged tips that we was conducting insider trading. To get the FBI off his back he had to give up his license to practice law, after doing so his colleague that he was so generous to gave Clay and Rebecca money and a apartment in london. They both moved to london In the end of the book and never looks back. I think this was a great way to end the book especially after the fact that you though clay was going to go jail and didn't and it …show more content…

What I think what would have happened is that the FBI would have contacted the CIA and would have started to look at leads and carry out a further investigation on Clay and Rebecca. Find out where they were and catch them, but then Clay would have been stuck in a stick position on either to turn himself in or continue to be on the run and Rebecca in more danger than what she is already in. I would hope clay would go on the run and end up faking their own deaths and move to some warm island and end the book knowing they are safe and no one is going to catch

More about Character Analysis: King Of Torts

Open Document