The relationship between a local government and its people is typically a combined form of stability, as well as discordant moments of tension and rising-to-dramatic change. More specifically, the political climate of the local government differs depending on how those people view the three aspects of their governmental calls and needs: rights and responsibility of the people, obligations of their government, and limits on the local governmental authority. In the youth of Texas, the Democratic Party enjoyed electoral dominance on all levels of state government and in the representation in the national government. Democratic rule was dominated by a conservative white political elite that strongly promoted economic development, but that resisted change either in race relations or social programs for the poor ("Texas Politics," 2009). Republicans were not completely absent during this period, but their electoral victories were few and limited in scope ("Texas Politics," 2009). In every election after 1980, however, the Republican strength grew into the now dominant rule that currently reigns in Texas. Since the 1990’s, the Republican Party, despite the attempts of others, has had a stronghold on the state government. With that being said, the Republican Party has dominated the overall elections. Every citizen, as incumbent citizens within the State of Texas, has certain responsibilities and undertakings to consider. Included in such considerations are the roles we are slated with when selecting an elected official for our Congressional District. This Congressional District representative is a person elected by “the people”, such as those in a city or county, in hopes that they will have a voice to represent the decisions designed to impact their areas, respectfully. One such Congressional District representative is Lamar Seeligson Smith. Lamar S. Smith, a Republican, represents the 21st Congressional District in the state of Texas. In summary, the 21st Congressional District includes portions of Bexar and Travis Counties and all of Comal, Real, Kerr, Bandera, Kendall and Blanco Counties. Over 650,000 people live in the 21st Congressional District and Smith has been serving as a state representative here since November, 1986. Smith was born and raised in San Antonio, Texas and has spent a large part of his life living, and now representing, the city and surrounding areas. He graduated from T.M.I.: The Episcopal School of Texas, Yale University, a private research university in New Haven, Connecticut, and Southern Methodist University Law School, located in Dallas, Texas ("Representative Lamar S.,"). He briefly practiced law as an attorney before entering politics ("Representative Lamar S.
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
In the great state of Texas, the governor is the highest ranked official that is elected. Even though it is believed the governor has minimal power due to EJ Davis and his abuse of power in the 1800’s, the governor still has an influence on many things and has the power to implement things as well. According to the Associated Press (2011), “The governor’s chair is an increasingly powerful institution in most states, with the clout, control, and visibility that has long made it the leading stepping stone to the oval office.” (Associated Press [AP],2011). The governor of Texas is the head of the executive branch and the commander-in-chief of the state’s military forces. One key role the governor has is the power to appoint or select members to
In the United States, for the last four decades, from Richard Nixon to Ronald Reagan through the two Bush Presidencies, the Republican Party won the White House by amassing large margins among white voters (Lizza.) The state of Texas has been reliably Republican since the 1970s and there are various elements to Texas political culture that can be narrowed down to three essential ideological trends: economic liberalism, or faith in the free market economy, social conservatism, or favoring traditional values and moralism, and populism, or promoting the rights and worthiness of ordinary people (Texas Political Culture.) As a result, the dominant political mood in Texas favors low taxes, minimal government services, and policies that are pro-business. This phenomenon is not static, however, since changing demographics in the state are causing changes in the profile of Texas in reference to electoral politics, among other major issues. This paper will explore different perspectives about the changing demographics of Texas, and where they might lead the state politically, and will present a variety of viewpoints regarding this complex subject.
The Texas Constitution provides for the division of power and integration of Bill of Rights to the constituents of the State of Texas. The Texas Constitution is made up of a preamble, seventeen articles, and an appendix. The current Constitution was written on November 26, 1875, and adopted February 15, 1876, it is also the eighth constitution to be adopted by the State of Texas. Similar to the United States Constitution the Texas Constitution contains a preamble as follows, “Humbly invoking the blessing of Almighty God, the people of the State of Texas do ordain and establish this Constitution” (Tex. Const., pmbl).
12 April 1844 was the Treaty of Texas’ Annexation into the United States of America. We take note that Texas was accepted into the “Union States” as an anti-slave state, as were all the territories annexed from the Mexican War. So finally, on 29 December 1846, the 29th Congress met and concluded in the Joint Resolution of Congress that the Republic of Texas was to be accepted as a new state in the United States under a republican government, equal to all of the original states before it and in every respect. Texas was entitled to two representatives in the House of Representatives until the government did a census of Texas’s people.
“Bill Ratliff: A Profile of Courage and Leadership in American Politics” (2016), by Robert Sterken, is a written record of the political history of Bill Ratliff, the 40th Lieutenant Governor of the state of Texas. Sterken delves, not only into the politics of Bill Ratliff, but his life story. The history behind Ratliff is essential to understanding his psyche, as it was his morale character that would be the mold for the choices in his political career. In this essay, the author will provide an overview of the book, and then discuss three political decisions Ratliff made while serving in office.
Texas politics can be interpreted as a very difficult and complicated institution. Its political democracy can be construed to fall under the mixture of two very distinct theoretical approaches. These models include elitism and pluralism. Elitism is the belief that individuals who derive power from leadership positions from large organizations and have great financial wealth can monopolize and influence important policy decisions. Pluralism is the theory that democracy can be achieved through competition among multiple interest groups. While many can argue that these two theories do not coincide with another, it can be noted otherwise. In this essay, elitism and pluralism will be discussed on how they are both visible in Texas democracy.
The city of Houston is quite large and holds with it certain qualities that most cites cannot even begin to understand, but is this just the Houstonian pride talking? Generally, there’s an established set of protocols and practices held by people that form their political behavior or better yet their political culture. It is these practices, moral decisions, political myths, beliefs, and ideas that creates a good society.
Newell, Charldean. "Inflexibility, Traditionalism, and Partisanship: The Texas Response to New Federalism." Review. Annual Review of American Federalism 12 (1981 (1983): 185-95. Publius. Oxford University Press. Web. 23 Mar. 2011.
Most Democrats believed that Tony Sanchez was a great candidate and representative for the minorities and would bring out a historical demographic voter turnout. Sanchez spent a total of $64 million, $59 million of which was estimated to be his own money, to become the first Hispanic governor of Texas (Last man Standing…). But, he lacked a great amount of experience and was even called boring by the media. And, to add insult to injury, his opponent released an ad calling Sanchez a “drug money launderer” which discredited his trustworthiness and almost any chance he had to sway any of the republican
Texas gives the power to its people by simply giving them the right to elect or choose officials. The people can elect city officials as well as state officials. Being able to elect or choose an official for your state is what a democracy is. Though some officials would like to do away with democracy, it is one of the most important powers that the people of Texas have. However, many feel that the people they elected often find themselves questioning their decisions. For example, someone would run making promises that fit to the voter, but once elected in office they do the exact opposite of what they promised. That has become a major problem that people face and often leads people to wonder if this is truly a
Those who were poor or a minority were disenfranchised.1 All states have features of all three political cultures. Due to the large and diverse nature of the state itself, it is hard to generalize the political culture of Texas. However, individualists and traditionalists have, in history, controlled the direction of the state of Texas’ political system.1 A vast amount of Texans descend from migrants of the traditionalistic states of the Old South where conservatism, upper-class superiority, and one-party politics reigned. Even today, this traditionalistic influence still remains. Texas’ individualism stems from the government structure that is still in place today. Compared to other densely populated states, Texas government is limited with restricted
Initially, Texas has filed a suit against the placement of Syrian refugees, more recently it has requested the U.S 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss said suit. It seems as though the only people disappointed with this decision are Texas state officials, as refugees are welcomed by state residents. It’s as if the Texas population has become so diverse that people in state office are unable to represent their ideals. Officials remain rigid in their republican ideology, making it difficult for them to meet the demands of the more party flexible population. Perhaps party identification is losing some of the intense significance it once held.