Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critiques of performance management
Theories of career development
Performance management literature review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critiques of performance management
Introduction With a brand new era full of opportunities and innovations, a great diversity of chance for employees consider optimal position and workplace what they should devote to.The main characteristic of this phenomenon is everyday in uncertainty , in order to manage this change people need to manage change.This essay centers on analyzing a personal experience about how they change their work over time by interviewing and explaining the perspective of a former middle manager in a real estate company.This essay seeks to link ‘Changing work’ to theory, by widening descriptive codes and comparing particular theories. Theory Changing work define employees have implement change in workplace which including manager change employees to proper position and restructure organization. Otherwise, employees change their work value or workplace, even both of them. When employee is confronted with mismatch between workplace situation and work values, job-hopping would be a choice for them to avoid negative consequence (Hauff and Kirchner,2014). Sometimes, after excellent performance for a long time or gaining an achievement in own department, employees get high percentage to gain a promotion due to manager’s praise and trust. Maslow(1943), …show more content…
Enterprise absorbs elites with attractive working condition and remuneration packages. Ten Have et al.(2003) defined five aspects through different desire of human beings,including physiological needs, certainty, social acceptance,appreciation and self-actualization which mainly focus on physical , social and personal.After satisfied with the desire at first level, employees turn to next stage(Have et al., 2003).However, there are still exist limitation, not all individuals can reach the highest level of the pyramid,hence the higher level ,the fewer individuals can attain
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
The 7 Levels of Change provides a different way of thinking to enhance behaviors and processes. The author demonstrates throughout the book a seven process of change that builds upon the next. He believes that by thinking differently, being creative and stepping out of the norm is the catalyst to solutions and results beyond one’s expectations. Although the author uses the analogy of a new work environment to expound on the level of changes, the fundamentals can be used in both your personal and professional life.
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Organizational change is a very big risk for organizations. The process of change can be very difficult for employees as well as the leaders implementing the changes. The changes are usually planned to improve the company. However, sometimes change can destroy a company when things don’t go as planned. From a change in management to a change in the company structure, or way of doing daily task, organizations must carefully execute the process of change and use change strategies that will ensure success.
Change should be seen as a challenge and embraced with enthusiasm (Marquis & Huston, 2012). In my professional and personal life, I view and respond to change as a way to make improvements to existing regulations and circumstances. I embark upon the quest with determination to succeed at whatever task is presented to me. Life without change can become unchallenging and stagnant (Marquis & Huston, 2012). As society and technology advance, you must incorporate the necessary transformations that arise with it.
Not only the type of the work employees are required to do changes, place, method, and environment of the work is also subject to transformation. With high turnover being common characteristic among modern organizations, people have to work in teams each time composed of different people.
Implementing change in the workplace is a dynamic process. Although change itself can be controlled and limited to some degree, innovation is substantially even more dynamic. This dynamic, unpredictable process introduces vulnerability, which can lead to employee frustration. Just as the scenario addresses, many individuals become motivated at the thought of change and innovation; however, the change does not occur due to resistance or other obstacles. Much of this resistance arises from the unpredictability and vulnerability of the process. Managers must be able to prevent or manage resistance by using tools and strategies to smooth the process.
Changing jobs in the 20th century was considered an oddity. Carrying on the tradition of beginning and ending ones career with the same company was the norm. Find a good company to work for, start at the bottom and work your way as high as possible was common place then. These organizations, known as “‘womb to tomb’ employers” (p. 42) would often times keep personnel in their employ with fifty years or more of faithful service.
Balogun discusses a study that was done on middle managers during a transitional year in an organization, including structural, operational, and cultural changes. From this study, it was found that as “change intermediaries,” middle managers fulfill four roles: undertaking personal change, helping others through change, implementing necessary changes in their department, and keeping the business going.
ANALYSIS ON FACTORS THAT COTRIBUTE TO THE INCREMENTAL AND TRANSFORMATIONAL QUANTUM CHANGE IN SELECTED ORGANISATION
Robbins et al. (2011, p. 186), states ‘Change is an organizational reality and affects every part of a manager’s job’. Today’s wave of change primarily created by economic condition so change is now such a constant feature of organization life (Goodman, E. 2011, p.243). Organizations need to be changed at one point or another in structure, technology or people. These changes are defined as organizational change (Robbins et al. 2011, p.18). Organizational change is important because changes can increase effectiveness and efficiency, the innovation of products, services as well as dealing with changes in external and internal forces (Goodman, E. 2011, p.243). However, ‘the bottom line is that organizational change is difficult because management systems are design and people are rewarded for stability’ (Lawler, E.E. & Worley, C.G. 2006, p.11).
The article “Organizational Change management” is majorly based on addressing and evaluating different literatures and views related to the organizational functions in terms of change management and the impact of behavioral changes and psychological contract within employee and employer on the proper execution and success of change management. The illustration of organizational change management has highlighted different approaches adopted and executed by number of organizations. The rapid changes in economical and political factors of external business environment as well as the introduction of complex and globalized business practices has influenced a number of businesses to accept the practice of continuous change management in terms of coping up with the competitive environment.