“As a country, the first amendment says we have a right to freedom of speech. Though this fundamentally sounds fantastic, there are many “regulations” imposed on this concept which is slowly turning the United States into a censored nation. These regulations may not be imposed directly by the government, however an independent agency with very strong ties to the conservatives at the White House, runs an organization that pretty much determines what we can and cant see/ hear.” ©2016 TermPaperWarehouse.com In today’s modern day world, is censorship in the media a good thing or a bad thing, what can be gained and what can be lost? .” We now have the freedom to believe, think and say what we want. However, don’t you think there are some …show more content…
The government has many other enforcement tasks to deal with of much greater importance than internet censorship. The Internet grows exponentially every day with new websites emerging every second, thus making the rules of censorship extremely difficult to enforce. Sometimes, accumulation of these challenges leads to poor enforcement of these laws. Decreased access to vital information becomes a problem because it is hard to erase all of the negative content that people deem offensive, without also getting rid of a plethora of useful information in the process. There are people that use the Internet for good fun and information but there are others who misuse it. Since the range is very wide that can offer both positive content and harmful content, it can pose a difficult problem for the government to make the correct decisions about what to eliminate and what to keep. Internet censorship is still an evolving science, the governor in agencies are limited in their ability to remove offensive or illegal content and not interrupting any vital information in the process. The censorship laws of the Internet function to either completely eliminate certain websites or trying to pick and choose on which approach to take while still leaving the useful information intact. So at what point is too much censorship, …show more content…
Here are some final thoughts to help one formulate their own opinions Censorship is the best justified method to make sure everyone 's rights. In a society which is made up by variety of people, there must be some law that everyone follows to make the society in order. Justification means everyone is treated the same; anyone who obeys the law will have their rights equally; anyone who offends the law will be punished or circumscribed. Justification doesn 't mean that, as someone thinks, everyone can do whatever you want to do because that will make the society happens to be in
"The words of the first amendment are simple and majestic: 'Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech.' The proposed constitutional amendment would undermine that fundamental liberty."
Freedom of speech has been a controversial issue throughout the world. Our ability to say whatever we want is very important to us as individuals and communities. Although freedom of speech and expression may sometimes be offensive to other people, it is still everyone’s right to express his/her opinion under the American constitution which states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press”. Although this amendment gave people the right express thier opinions, it still rests in one’s own hands as how far they will go to exercise that right of freedom of speech.
Is it moral that we let our government decide what we hear or say? We as God believing, naturally good, human beings should know the difference between what is good, and what is bad. I believe that's the greatest immoral act of all. Bibliography:.. TAKING CONTROL Adam Veness Essay College Prep English Bolton A 3 Americans hate the word censorship.
In the first amendment, it is stated that all people have the Freedom of speech, religion,
Freedom of speech and expression is a right given to all Americans in the First
Since this country was founded, we have had a set of unalienable rights that our constitution guarantees us to as Americans. One of the most important rights that is mentioned in our constitution is the right to free speech. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
Censorship has been a big part of the world’s history and especially America’s history. One of the most quoted amendments to the United States constitution is the first amendment; “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ...” This amendment guaranteeing free speech, press, and religion is still heavily debated and contested today. Censorship, as a challenge to free speech and press has been allowed many times and has been heavily debated itself. Many people censor for many different reasons and in many different forms. Censorship itself is not always a bad thing and has in some cases been used for protection of the general population.
For years, the topic of censorship has a been highly controversial issue. Over the centuries, many people have fought and died to gain the freedom of speech and ideas. The impression that creative ideas and important information should be hidden from society and controlled by the government, is a discordant one. Censorship is the act of controlling the freedom of speech, ideas, and information. Unsuprisingly, people in the nineteenth or the twentieth century had no problem with the controversial issue of censorship. A century ago, technology just started to make itself known in the world. People had the radio, the television, and the typewriter. Although the internet was invented, it was hardly used as frequently as individuals, in modern times,
"Internet Censorship." What does this mean to us? What is restricted? Censorship is summarily defined as the suppression of objectionable material. That means that material such as pornography, militant information, offensive language, anti-religion, and racism would be restricted in use. Freedom would not only be restricted to material placed on the web, but also what you could access, and where you could explore. Should the right of Freedom of Speech be taken away from us on the Internet? Having stated this, should there be any restrictions and if so, what's the limit of censorship?
that some of the material that is on the net needs to be filtered and regulated. The word censorship is defined as examining any material and prohibiting what is objectionable, according to Webster’s II dictionary. Censoring the internet is a violation of the first ammendment rights of every citizen in the United States. There are two general truths that some people feel are attitudes towards censoring the internet. The first is that very few people admit to favoring it. The second is that no matter who you are, in a matter of minutes spent surfing the net almost anyone can find something that they find to be offensive. In fact, some web surfers feel that the truly inappropriate things are inspired by one’s own religion. For example, the Nurenberg Files website showed pictures of mangled fetuses with the photograph, name, and address of some abortion clinic doctors.
Since the foundation of the United States after a harsh split from Britain, almost 200 years later, an issue that could claim the founding grounds for the country is now being challenged by educators, high-ranking officials, and other countries. Though it is being challenged, many libertarians, democrats, and free-speech thinkers hold the claim that censorship violates our so-called unalienable rights, as it has been proven throughout many court cases. Censorship in the United States is detrimental because it has drastically and negatively altered many significant events. Censorship allows governments more control of society than they already have, slowly progressing governments utilizing censorship to a dictatorship. Often times, this censorship can lead to immense rebellions.
Most of the Internet regulation is imposed by the Government in an effort to protect the best interest of the general public and is concerned with some form of censorship.
Ever wondered the reason behind racial discrimination, sexual discrimination, children committing crime or violence? The main reason is that censorship is not properly imposed or there is a need of censorship in the society. Censorship is the suppression of ideas and information that certain people, individual, groups or government officials find it objectionable, offensive or dangerous on others. There are varieties of other definitions but all have in common the concept of withholding information and/or resources from those who seek it. Hence censorship is essential in society to eliminate discrimination on basis of race and sex, protect children, maintain stability and restore what censor sees as lost moral values. Censorship occurs when expressive materials like books, magazines, movies, videos, music or work of art are restricted to particular audiences based on their age or other characteristics. (http://www.ala.org/oif/intellectualfreedeomandcensorship.html)
Censorship is blocking or hiding something that is considered unacceptable to the public eye or a group of a certain age. In looking at the effects of censorship on society, it is apparent that it can both be beneficial and harmful. Censorship is seen to be beneficial through preventing dangerous people from viewing government documents and preventing children from viewing inappropriate content. Censorship can be harmful when it comes to taking away rights declared in the Constitution and setting unequal standards for men and women. These examples show how effects censorship has on society can be both good and bad. Looking at facts and credible opinions is a way to truly see how censorship has negative and positive effects.
First, some believe that that censorship violates Americans’ first amendment right. The first amendment, located in the Bill of Rights, gives United States citizens gives the freedom of religion, assembly, press, petition, and most relevant, speech. Some argue that censorship violates this right. This is untrue. In a 1972 court cased titled Miller v California, Miller was convicted for campaigning and distributing obscene materials. The court case was over whether or not charging him for this was unconstitutional. In the end, “the Court held that obscene materials did not enjoy First Amendment protection” (Miller v California). This shows that certain types of censorship do not violate U.S. citizens’ first amendment right. Next, some people believe that censorship grants the government too much power. In an article on the Washington Times, Tony Blankley recalls the events of September 11th, 2001 and then writes, “Aside from establishing a regime for handling captured foreign terrorists, the curtailments largely consisted of common-sense enhancements in the power of intelligence agencies to monitor terrorism suspects and access their personal record” (Blankley). Here, Blankley is saying that it is important for the government to step in and have control at certain times. This expresses the statement that censorship does not give the government too much power and that it is not a negative thing, which