Fahrenheit 451 Censorship Analysis

924 Words2 Pages

The dancer, Martha Graham, once said “Censorship is the height of vanity.” Ray Bradbury would agree. Censorship makes media shallow and information limited; individuals living in a harshly censored society will be engulfed by feelings of hollowness. For instance, Montag from Fahrenheit 451 feels that his life is missing something, and believes that the books he burns hold it. Clarisse’s classmates learn absolutely nothing in school, and are tired out to the point that they cannot think. Even more, Beatty, the novel’s largest advocate for censorship, has a breakdown, in which he implied that he read heavily, and that his job as Fire Chief caused him deep, inner turmoil. In Fahrenheit 451, censorship and the obstruction of free thought is portrayed …show more content…

To elaborate, the society limited the knowledge that citizens have access to by having firemen burn books. Montag, the protagonist, has become disillusioned with the constraints exerted upon him; the Old Woman and Clarisse’s words and actions pushed Montag to see the thinly veiled oppression surrounding him, and the sudden realization sent him spiraling. In the midst of his breakdown, Montag sought out Faber’s help, telling him “We have everything we need to be happy but we aren’t happy. Something’s missing... The only thing I positively know was gone are the books I burned in ten or twelve years” (Bradbury 78). Montag explicitly states that he believes knowledge is what he needs to be happy. While he used to contribute to censorship, several factors (Mildred’s suicide attempt, the Old Woman’s martyrdom, Clarisse’s insight) caused Montag to reevaluate himself, and conclude that censorship was the bane of his happiness. Furthermore, Montag’s persistence that the books he used to burn are actually vital to happiness exhibits how truly limiting censorship is to contentment. In a similar manner to Montag, Clarisse’s friend’s actions display how dissatisfied they are with their …show more content…

Undoubtedly, Beatty is the novel’s number one advocate for censorship (in the form of burning books), however, he insinuates that he is actually an avid reader. Although he claims to hate books, as well as that every book he has read made him unhappy, these statements do not aline with his actions. To demonstrate, Beatty quotes several books throughout the novel, and prior to the raid of Montag’s home, Beatty enters a frenzied state, quoting books left and right, and speaking in a delusional manner. If books upset him so much, why would Beatty read to the point of being able to perfectly quote numerous? Subsequent to burning Montag’s home, Beatty (empty handed) taunts Montag (armed with a flame thrower),edges him on, saying. “Go ahead now, you second-hand litterateur, pull the trigger” (Bradbury 113). Montag takes the bait, and kills Beatty, giving Beatty what he wanted. Even Montag realizes, while reflecting, that Beatty wanted to die here. The demonization of readers absolutely wrecks Beatty; he was incredibly passionate about books, but with his society screaming that what he loves is the root of all that is wrong with the world, Beatty is tormented by the juxtaposition. The censorship of books combined with the general public view of those who did read pushed Beatty to the cliff and then shoved him off it for good

Open Document