Celia A Slave Analysis

1426 Words3 Pages

In the nineteenth century, slaves were afforded very few, if any, civil rights and freedoms, often being treated very cruelly. Although the abusive treatment of slaves was not unusual, the act of a slave protecting themselves against a master was. In the book Celia, A Slave, McLaurin recounts the trial of a female slave who was charged, convicted, and later executed for the crime of murdering her master in 1855. The author provides evidence for her argument through analyzation of documents gathered from Callaway County, Missouri, and the area surrounding, during the mid-nineteenth century. As the circumstances of Celia’s case were unique, in the fact that she had violently retaliated, the debate arose as to whether she was afforded rights to …show more content…

Although the law states “any woman”, this statute did not apply to female slaves. Slave women were not protected in cases of rape, and in some situations it was not only the master of the slaves but other male slaves who sexually assaulted their female counterparts. Whether the assailant is white or black, women could rarely legally defend themselves. In the majority of states which enacted slavery laws, slaves themselves were referred to as property. Celia was no longer seen as a human being, but rather as a piece of property, and Newsom saw her as nothing more than a …show more content…

Often, they struggled with the fact that although there were laws in place, these laws rarely applied to slaves. With this constant questioning, Judge William Hall decided to take this trial as an opportunity to address the conflict, disputing any claims of an unfair trial by providing Celia with a talented attorney named John Jameson. Jameson was thought to be able to give a “presence [that] would make it difficult for slavery’s critics to label the trial a farce or sham.”(82) It can be noted that although Celia had the right to a trial, she was not guaranteed a fair trial. One of the blatant disregards to a fair trial was that Celia was not allowed to testify in her own defense. “For under Missouri law, as was the case in many southern states, a slave could not testify against a white person, even one deceased” (108) as noted by McLaurin. This law often resulted in slaves receiving a bias trial in favor of those bringing charges against them. Unlike most attorney’s, Jameson fought valiantly for Celia , arguing that in this situation, Celia had a right to protect herself(103). If an altercation escalated far enough, slaves in “slaveholding states…[had] the right to use force to repel physical attacks that threatened his or her life” (102).This right not only allowed slaves to defend themselves physically but legally as well. With these basic

Open Document