Lagarde, Haines & Palmer (2009) describe cash transfer as the facility of cash assistance to rise up the household revenue. In Latin America, it was called as Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT). This program was aimed to help families living in severe scarcity. Cash assistance or cash aid is not the same with monetization, microfinance, insurance, economical funding and setting aside of institute bills (Harvey, 2005). This cash assistance is alternative to food aid, agricultural and non-food items. Not only that, there also several descriptions use in labeling the cash incentives. Those descriptions are cash reward, cash assistance, revival grants, and cash for work, recruitment, community works, conditional cash transfers, demilitarization programs …show more content…
It was done after knowing 20 percent of pregnant women passed away during maternity. The program is known as Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY). Under this program, the government wishes to inspire unfortunate women to go to pregnancy scan and deliver in a health facility. The objective of the program was also to rise up the institutional deliveries as well as to decrease financial problem and thereby lessen maternal and neonatal death. The study stated that the cash aid program in terms of the knowledge of the scheme, the total of money received, time delay, documents needed, unofficial payment and recommendations for developments. The benefits of the scheme are to encourage the institutional delivery, to decrease maternal and infant deaths and to help unfortunate people to purchase …show more content…
The cash coupon could also be known as as the cash transfer where the cash relief be likely to assist people to purchase the basic essentials such as food or non-food, facilities or other necessary assets. The transfer of cash to in need recipients perhaps will be used for emergency purpose, nutritional needs, food complement, shelter usage and other basic amenities.
Harvey (2005) discovered the use of cash and vouchers in difficulties and reveals some individuals who encourage the approaches because mutually are cost-effective and timely, extend the options and self-esteem of recipients and have an influence on local economic motion. A number of responses claimed the methods because both will suffer the risk and corruption and will be more difficult than commodities.
(Zedlewski, Loprest & Huber, 2011) In the United States, the family who has kids and jobless are entitled to get impermanent cash aid under a scheme known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Family (TANF) with every household who has kid but shortage of consistent revenue because of jobless, are entitled to get temporary cash aid. De Mesquita and Smith (2009) studied on the economic assistance set by Organization for Economic Coorporation and Development (OECD). Their study discovered that OECD nations have slight humanitarian inspiration for aid
The United States continues to give around $550 billion in aid to other countries each year, making America the world's top donor by far (Richardson). While the United States government only supplies $252 billion to needy Americans each year. Former Assistant to the President for Communications, Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous" (Foreign Aid). The United States need to give money to support the domestic impoverished rather than supporting developing foreign countries because the poverty and homelessness in America is increasing faster than the aid necessary to reduce this trend. Part of the reason that the United States should aid the domestic impoverished is that some foreign countries cannot be trusted with the money given to them and in certain cases, the money intended to aid countries are harmful for that country’s well-being.
Programs that help people who are in poverty are known as Public-Assistance programs that only help citizens whose income doesn’t meet the law standards of living and as well to those who are not covered by social insurance (Katznelson 326). These programs are known as “undeserving” as they are not indexed and organized by the state. The programs include supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) known as food stamps, Temporary assistance to needy families (TANF), and Medicaid. These programs are set to help Americans who are struggling, but unfortunately, these programs have been abused.
The issues surrounding welfare and welfare reform are controversial, political, and difficult to resolve. The debate continues today as to who deserves benefits and who does not. In 1933, President Roosevelt created Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) as part of the New Deal. This early form of welfare was available to those who could demonstrate a need and the ability to maintain minimal assets of their own. It specifically targeted aid to single women with children. It was a controversial and highly debated subject. Even now, many years later, Congress continues to debate and reform welfare programs. It still brings with it the same intensity, controversy, and conflicting opinion it did years ago.
Those who struggle with poverty know that there are few opportunities for change and ways to get money. With a growing poverty threshold resulting in massive amounts of poor people living in inadequate living conditions, it makes it hard to obtain the essential life necessities. Many factors lead to this steadily growing tragedy. Many of those who live in poverty have few resources necessary for them to acquire money, resulting in the decision to get cash through payday loans, or quick cash. Despite the amount of money Payday Loan Companies lend to lower classes, they actually cause more harm to those who receive assistance than it actually helps them. ...
Poverty is an issue in America that has become a growing problem. While it may not necessarily be an issue that gains a lot of attention from people in today’s society, it is still a problem that should be addressed, especially in times of economic hardship like the ones that we are currently experiencing. Money has become tight for a lot of people, but there are still those that have always had a problem meeting the needs that they have in everyday life. In order to address this problem, the government put into place many government aid programs that are designed to help those when they are truly in need of it. However, it seems that today there are many people who are receiving government aid that do not truly need it. These are the people that cheat the system and the tax payers who are paying for the benefits that they are receiving.
In addition to low earnings, the prime reason for the inability to increase funds and thus increase security of income is that profits or potential savings are often pocketed by moneylenders who charge lofty interest rates, by formal and informal regulatory and enforcement agents/organizations who demand bribes or extort protection money, and by middlemen or other stronger business partners who exploit the poor because they lack market information or the ability to use the market information to increase their own incomes. Another key that prevents the poor from raising capital is that they are often forced to purchase public goods and services at a much higher cost that are readily available to other groups in society at market or below market prices(6).
The United States has provided food, shelter and education for the past 75 years. When the Great Depression hit many families suffered. It was estimated that one-fourth of the labor workforce was unemployed during the hardest time of the depression. Many families were living in poverty and needed assistance in order to live through the hard time many were faced...
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
Foreign aid is financial help given by a country to another for purposes of economic stabilization, poverty and living standard. This essay will elaborate an issue that it is necessary to spend money on foreign aid. There are three premises supporting the main conclusion, the first reason is that aid saves lives, while the premises that aid improves education and aid reduces poverty rate both can be objected and rebuttal are also given. Furthermore, there are also two objection given which can be rebutted.
“Reducing poverty is important for those affected, for society and the economy” (Sutherland). So then the question of what to do about it comes up. “Understanding the relationship between policy, power and agency is a vital part of working to prevent poverty at all levels” (Sutherland). There are so many factors that play into poverty that it is important to have a better understanding of each of these complex and layered issues. Once this is done, we must strive to improve systems such as the cash net as well as others designed for aiding those who are
Welfare is the most common method for the poor citizens in the United States. It provides cash support to low-income families with children, mainly raised by a single mothers. This occurs in the 1990s. The welfare reform has some very positive effects on people’s lives. The Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program and Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program was founded in the year 1996 (Cozic 47). This exceptional reform forced work requirements for the programs. These requirements which were given to a large amount of people and by the use of agreements it would cut off benefits for people who did not cooperate. The reform also enforced bounds on the reception of benefits. Welfare has had an impact on parents and children lives for years; but case studies are repeatedly saying there isn’t enough money to supply these families; at some point the government should consider another way to provider direct assistance for families suffering from these cases. As a result of the reform, the program was deeply affected and things changed drastically: single mothe...
Singer’s argument may have swayed many people to donate their dispensable income to children in need despite the fact that it has many fundamental flaws. He argues that we should give away the majority of our earnings to charity. Since Singer wants the reader to donate such a large amount of money, the readers are given no choice but to contribute nothing whatsoever. His solution is not realistic and does not take into account the long-term financial impact this type of donation contribution system would have on a country’s economy.
“Poverty is the state of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possession” (“Poverty”). Throughout history, poverty has been a debilitating social issue that has negatively impacted people and societies. Numerous programs and initiatives dating back centuries have attempted to solve poverty yet it still remains an issue. There are many strategies that help combat or minimize poverty. We will look at how government legislation and social aid programs have impacted poverty and also the factors that ultimately place people in poverty.
In most cases, shortage of money is not the sole problem. Rather, poverty is a mere term summarised by a sophisticated factors of corruption, lack of infrastructure, civil unrest, government failure, and many more. Especially, donated money are regularly spent to run campaigns, provide wages to staffs, and to run the charities, with a very few of the amount being invested directly to help the poor. This socio-political scepticism can be worse as some believe that charity is merely a band aid fix to the deeper underlying problem that is continuously causing the poverty, and it only becomes the basis for local communities to be dependent on
These programmes exhibit considerable diversity in terms of objectives and programme design. They can take the form of pure income transfers, like in the case of South Africa’s Child Support Grant, whereas other countries have adopted a different approach consisting in linking income transfers with basic service provision. For example, Mexico’s Oportunidades (previously known as Progresa), and Brazil’s Bolsa Familia, which provides income transfers to poor households on condition that they regularly send their children to school and that household members attend health clinics. In fewer countries, like in the case of Chile Solidario, income transfers are combined with a wide range of interventions in health, education, employment, and housing. Our focus on social protection programmes directly focusing on childr...