Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pricing strategy for business markets
Pricing strategy for business markets
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pricing strategy for business markets
PRICING
To be able to understand how the four types of market affect pricing decisions we must first look at the factors considered when setting prices. As per discussion in class, competitors; consumer perception of price and values; market and demand all together contribute to the pricing decisions. According to the study of Economics these factors are present in the four types of market: Monopoly, Oligopoly, Perfect competition and Monopolistic competition.
In monopoly, where there is only one provider of a product or service, the company controls the pricing decision. Seeing that there is none, if not limited, existing competition in the market proves that the company is not dependent on the pricing decision of other electricity service suppliers. A common local example would be Meralco, although there are other electricity providers outside Mega Manila, Meralco is still considered the largest and the most income generating electricity supplier in the country. Being the largest assumes a big bulk of the population demanding and relying on the services it provides, there is not much choice left for the consumers but to patronize Meralco, in effect the charges that the company asserts (under the government’s approval) will always be assimilated by the consumers. The unavailability of other options gave them the position to take control of the pricing of charges.
In oligopoly the market is shared by a small number of producers or sellers. Since it is dominated by a small number of sellers, each one is mindful on the act of the other and decisions of each other firms influence one another. There is a concern on the reactions or responses of the other sellers in the markets thus the pricing decision is thought of carefully against the competitor’s pricing decisions, it now becomes dependent on the other participants in the market. The local examples are the prominent landline telecommunication service suppliers such as PLDT, Bayantel, Digitel and Globelines. Based from observations on ads and promotions every time one seller initiates a call charge reduction the other sellers automatically follows the trend. The whole idea in this kind of market is that firms are actually after price decrease, with the hope of gaining a bigger share of the market. Either pricing decision indicates a decrease or increase all actions will create a price war response with other sellers.
A perfect competition market describes a market setting wherein the buyers and sellers are so numerous that the market price of commodity is no longer in control of either the buyers or the sellers.
Price discrimination can be defines as when a firm offers an “individual good at different prices to different consumers” The Library of Economics and Liberty elaborates on its pricing strategy, stating Comcast offers different pricing depending on what features the consumer desires. For instance, the cable company will charge a higher price to a person who uses several services as part of their cable package. Conversely, the firm charges a very low price to someone who would “otherwise not be interested” , providing basic services at a minimum price. It takes advantage of the regulation imposed on the cable industry by offering the required basic package at seemingly attractive prices. Using this pricing system allows for it to attract different consumers whose maximum price they are willing to pay differs. Recently, Comcast attempted a new billing strategy by introducing a data usage cap. It essentially expanded on the company’s existing price discrimination method by charging customers according to how much data they used each month. Comcast also utilizes penetration pricing, where it offers its product at low prices to attract new consumers, later raising the prices once the customer is subscribed for a certain amount of time. Generally it claims the original prices were promotional only, lasting only a small amount of
An oligopoly is defined as "a market structure in which only a few sellers offer similar or identical products" (Gans, King and Mankiw 1999, pp.-334). Since there are only a few sellers, the actions of any one firm in an oligopolistic market can have a large impact on the profits of all the other firms. Due to this, all the firms in an oligopolistic market are interdependent on one another. This relationship between the few sellers is what differentiates oligopolies from perfect competition and monopolies. Although firms in oligopolies have competitors, they do not face so much competition that they are price takers (as in perfect competition). Hence, they retain substantial control over the price they charge for their goods (characteristic of monopolies).
A perfect competitive firm is defined as: “a market structure with many fully informed buyers and sellers of a standardized product and no obstacles to entry or exit of firms in the long run.” The four characteristics of a perfectly competitive firm include the following: it must consist of many buyers and sellers, firms sell a particular commodity, buyers and sellers are fully informed about the price and availability of all resources and products, and firms and resources are freely mobile. These four characteristics contribute to the reason why a perfectly competitive firm is unable to become a “price-maker” (perfectly competitive firms are unable to make up their own prices) and must be a “price-taker”. As a result of being a “price-taker”,
A perfectly competitive market is based on a model of perfect competition. For a market to fall under this model it must have a number of firms, homogeneous products, and easy exit and entry levels into the market (McTaggart, 1992).
Based on the graph above, we can see that when the price of East Tuna increases, the sales of East Tuna decreases. The correlation (Refer to correlation) can prove that the relationship between the price of East Tuna and the sales of East Tuna are negatively related and it is fairly strong (-0.6159). The price of Kings Tuna is negatively related to the sales but with a weak relationship (-0.0247). Furthermore, the sales of East Tuna and the price of Lescos Tuna has a positive but weak relationship (0.1852). This means that Lescos Tuna is a competitor for East Tuna because when the price of Lescos Tuna increases, the sales of East Tuna increases as well. A software
Perfect competition, also known as, pure competition is defined as the situation prevailing in a market were buyers and sellers are so numerous and well informed that all elements of monopoly
a.) Perfect competition is used to benchmark allocative efficiency in market structure. It can be considered as unrealistic but still, characteristics of perfect competition guarantees efficiency. To demonstrate perfection is in fact the main purpose of perfect competition, it helps to evaluate the physical world market structure that certainly fall short of this perfection and illustrate the best of all possible resource allocation worlds.
In addition to these prerequisites, the perfect market required perfect consumer and supplier information, no rent seeking behaviour and no moral hazard existed. If these conditions were not met, market mechanisms would fail to produce the efficient allocation of resources.
The second market structure is a monopolistic competition. The conditions of this market are similar as for perfect competition except the product is not homogenous it is differentiated; thus having control over its price. (Nellis and Parker, 1997). There are many firms and freedom of entry into the industry, firms are price makers and are faced with a downward sloping demand curve as well as profit maximizers. Examples include; restaurant businesses, hotels and pubs, specialist retailing (builders) and consumer services (Sloman, 2013).
Well the bottom line is that a monopoly is firm that sells almost all the goods or services in a select market. Therefore, without regulations, a company would be able to manipulate the price of their products, because of a lack of competition (Principle of Microeconomics, 2016). Furthermore, if a single company controls the entire market, then there are numerous barriers to entry that discourage competition from entering into it. To truly understand the hold a monopoly firm has on the market; compare the demand curves between a Perfect Competitor and Monopolist firm in Figure
Markets have four different structures which need different "attitudes" from the suppliers in order to enter, compete and effectively gain share in the market. When competing, one can be in a perfect competition, in a monopolistic competition an oligopoly or a monopoly [1]. Each of these structures ensures different situations in regards to competition from a perfect competition where firms compete all being equal in terms of threats and opportunities, in terms of the homogeneity of the products sold, ensuring that every competitor has the same chance to get a share of the market, to the other end of the scale where we have monopolies whereby one company alone dominates the whole market not allowing any other company to enter the market selling the product (or service) at its price.
As market prices are determined in free markets by the interaction of demand and supply, changes in market prices are due to changes in demand or supply, or both.
An oligopolistic market has a small number of sellers dominating market share and therefore barriers to entry are high. These sellers are highly competitive and do not act independently of each other. Access to information is limited so sellers can only speculate of their competitor’s actions. Sellers will take advantage of competitor’s price changes in order to increase market share.
Price is what a buyer must give up to obtain a product. It is often the most flexible of the four marketing mix element that the price is the quickest element to change. A marketer can raise or lower prices more frequently and easily than they can change other marketing mix
This is the situation which occurs when two or more firms in an industry tend to reduce or change their own prices so that they can stand out in the industry, in return helps them increase their market share and gain more profit,which is then followed by other competitive firms. Firms with fewer financial resources may even be put out of the business. Price fixing plays a major role in a price war. In some industry, state of oligopoly is quite apparent (i.e. only a few sellers operate), this results in forcing small business to walk out of the market. Price wars represent one of the most severe forms of competitive interplay in the market place, causing great losses. Bhattacharya, 1996 and Busse, 2000 have studied that companies suffer losses in terms of margins, consumer equity, and ability to innovate, fall victim to substitutes, and even face bankruptcy. Initially consumers may be benefited from lower prices, may develop unrealistic reference prices and suffer from lower quality products in the long term. Rao et al, 2000 have studied that the battleground for price wars extends far beyond the classic examples involving the airline and energy businesses as price wars are seen to break out in all kinds