ABETMENT – AN ANALYSIS FROM THE INDIAN PERSPECTIVE
Res Ipsa Loquitor
INTRODUCTION:
A cardinal principle on which the foundation of the concept of the spirit of law rests arises from the Latin maxim Res Ipsa Loquitor, which when translated means, the thing speaks for itself. By definition, the maxim renders an understanding that a defendant can be held negligent simply on the grounds of a rebuttable presumption or inference which can be drawn upon the proof that the instrumentality or condition causing the injury was as a matter of fact in the exclusive control of the defendant and that the accidence was one that ordinarily, does not occur in the absence of negligence. It is pertinent to point out here that a case of abetment, arises mostly
…show more content…
State (Delhi Administration) . The Court held herein that a conspiracy is hatched in secrecy and it may be difficult to adduce direct evidence of the same. Providing the prosecution with some guidance, the Court laid down that it is essential to prove that two persons are independently pursuing a crime or if they have come together to the pursuit of the unlawful object. The former does not render the potential offenders into being conspirators, but the latter does. It is essential that the offence of conspiracy requires some kind of physical manifestation of agreement. The express agreement, however, need not be …show more content…
It differs from other offences because mere agreement is made an offence even if no step is taken to carry out that agreement. Though there is close association of conspiracy with instigation, the abetment by conspiracy as contemplated under the IPC does not have similar characteristics. Therefore, the characteristics of a case of criminal conspiracy were elucidated by the honorable Supreme Court of India in the case of Mohammad Khalid v. the State of West Bengal , held through a full bench that in order to prove a case of criminal conspiracy, the following characteristics should be clearly identifiable if: (a) an object to be accomplished is set out; (b) a plan or scheme embodying the means to accomplish that object is available; (c) an agreement or understanding between two or more of the accused persons whereby they become definitely committed to cooperate for the accomplishment of the object by the means embodied in the agreement, or by any effectual means; (d) in the jurisdiction where the statute required an overt
...ulations in the U.S. judicial system is “most define the law as a system of principles and processes by which people in a society deal with disputes and problems, seeking to solve or settle them without resorting to force” (p. 15). Some situations cannot be rectified in a board meeting. However, negligence is in the category of objectives of tort law, it is also the most popular lawsuit pursued by patients against medical professionals against doctors and healthcare organizations (Bal, 2009). Objectives of Tort Law
Ladies and gentlemen of the Jury. I am here to represent Justin Garcia, to prove the negligence of Jessica Nordeen. The law of negligence says that negligence occurs if an individual does something harmful that a person of ordinary intelligence would not do. In the next few moments,I will prove to the Jury that there was a breach of duty in the case of Garcia v. Nordeen.
—. Spotlight on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. 14 November 2012. Web. 20 February 2014. .
There are two public policy justifications for criminal liability and these are that conspiracy works with attempts to nip the criminal purposes in the bud and it also hits at the special danger of a groups criminal activity. For example, Dan is driving a car and Charles and Ryan are passengers. Dan stops the car and the two passengers get out and leave the doors open. These passengers rob and accost someone and jump back in and Dan drives off. A jury could find that the robbery was planned by all three of them and they could be prosecuted for conspiracy to commit robbery. To prove a conspiracy one needs to prove the actus reus and the mens rea. The conspiracy actus rea is the agreement to commit a crime and act to further the agreement. Conspiracy mens rea is the mental element of
made, no accusations are known to have rightfully accused the perpetrators and given them a
(7) H. L., Hart, The Concept of Law, ch. VIII, and D., Lyons, Ethics and the rule of law, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 78 ff,
When a prosecutor is deciding whether a case should be prosecuted in the courts and charges should be filed against someone, prosecutors consider two important questions: Is it in the best interest of the public to proceed? And, is there a strong reasonable likelihood that there will be a conviction? If the answer to both are yes, then there is the task of deciding whether there is enough evidence to prosecute the case and whether the evidence is reliable and can it be used in court. This means carefully assessing the quality of the evidence from all related witnesses before reaching a final decision.
The law of conspiracy is considerably more complex and uncertain than it need be because the statutory reform of the area largely contained in Part I of the criminal law Act 1977 was only partial. As a result, there are now two types of conspiracy – statutory conspiracies governed by the 1977 Act, and an important but limited range of common law conspiracies, which were expressly retained by the act, still governed by the old common law rules, (Tomlins & King, 1992). The most recent of the conspiracies is the conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to corrupt public morals and the conspiracy to outrage public decency; statutory conspiracy entails any agreement to commit a crime
Negligence, as defined in Pearson’s Business Law in Canada, is an unintentional careless act or omission that causes injury to another. Negligence consists of four parts, of which the plaintiff has to prove to be able to have a successful lawsuit and potentially obtain compensation. First there is a duty of care: Who is one responsible for? Secondly there is breach of standard of care: What did the defendant do that was careless? Thirdly there is causation: Did the alleged careless act actually cause the harm? Fourthly there is damage: Did the plaintiff suffer a compensable type of harm as a result of the alleged negligent act? Therefore, the cause of action for Helen Happy’s lawsuit will be negligence, and she will be suing the warden of the Peace River Correctional Centre, attributable to vicarious liability. As well as, there will be a partial defense (shared blame) between the warden and the two employees, Ike Inkster and Melvin Melrose; whom where driving the standard Correction’s van.
With the rapid increase in crime rates, the defendants must act recklessly or intentionally to be held guilty. Crimes can be classified into two types of intents; general, and specific intent.
To be criminally liable of any crime in the UK, a jury has to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the defendant committed the Actus Reus and the Mens Rea. The Actus Reus is the physical element of the crime; it is Latin for ‘guilty act’. The defendant’s act must be voluntary, for criminal liability to be proven. The Mens Rea is Latin for guilty mind; it is the most difficult to prove of the two. To be pronounced guilty of a crime, the Mens Rea requires that the defendant planned, his or her actions before enacting them. There are two types of Mens Rea; direct intention and oblique intention. Direct intention ‘corresponds with everyday definition of intention, and applies where the accused actually wants the result that occurs, and sets out to achieve it’ (Elliot & Quinn, 2010: 59). Oblique intention is when the ‘accused did not desire a particular result but in acting he or she did realise that it might occur’ (Elliot & Quinn, 2010: 60). I will illustrate, by using relevant case law, the difference between direct intention and oblique intention.
The overall success for IDEO’s comes from the aspects of organizational process, culture and management. IDEO is an overall outstanding product development firm which helps organizations design products, environments, digital experiences and even services. The company does so through design thinking “methodology”. In other words, IDEO has a design philosophy as a role of prototyping. IDEO has as proven to be doing a spectacular job at designing products and services for these organization considering that they have designed over thousands of products.
In this essay, I will describe the elements of a criminal act, address the law of factual impossibility, the law of legal impossibility, and distinguish whether the alleged crime in the scenario is a complete but imperfect attempt or an incomplete attempt. I will address the ethical or moralistic concerns associated with allowing a criminal defendant to avoid criminal responsibility by successfully asserting a legal defense such as impossibility. The court was clearly wrong to dismiss the charge against Jack of attempted murder of Bert.
The relationship between law and morality has been argued over by legal theorists for centuries. The debate is constantly be readdressed with new cases raising important moral and legal questions. This essay will explain the nature of law and morality and how they are linked.
SANDU, A., & NIŢU, M. (2013). CORRUPTION AND ORGANIZED CRIME. Contemporary Readings In Law & Social Justice, 5(2), 454-460.