In forming a case brief, a legal professional or law student must be able to identify the key areas or elements of a case. These are normal sections of a typical case in no particular order; although many cases will follow some semblance of a “typical” format and make finding these elements less difficult.
Facts: In most cases, the facts are decided at the trial level courts which are the lowest level and most familiar courts people use verses the intermediate or appellate level or the high court’s such as the Supreme Court. The facts are what happened pertaining to the case. An example would be Harry demanded Bob pay the debt owed in a letter sent on July 5th, 2012. While facts can be disputed at trial court level, a judge or jury decides
…show more content…
Usually seen more in an appellate decision or higher, the procedural history states where the case began and how it has proceeded to the level it is currently being heard. This often comes at the beginning of an opinion or decision especially an appellate court decision where the Judge delivering the opinion gives almost an abstract with disposition up front. An example of this is Safer v. Estate of Pack (1996) with the opinion being delivered by Judge Kestin starting with: “Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court 's order dismissing their complaint and denying their cross-motion for partial summary judgment as to liability only. We reverse that portion of the order dismissing the complaint and affirm the denial of plaintiffs ' motion.”
Issue(s): In an appeal, the facts (as noted above) are usually considered settled at the lower trial courts. Appellate courts and High Courts (also known as “courts of last resort”) decide “issues” pertaining to the application of laws and rules to a particular fact or set of facts. As stated on the USCourts.gov, the role of appeals courts are to “…determine whether or not the law was applied correctly in the trial court.” They also settle the constitutionality of legislation enacted where standing exists from an injured party. These are the “issues” the court must
A summary of the case details (provide the circumstances surrounding the case, who, what, when, how)
Schmalleleger, F. (2002). Criminal Law Today: An Introduction with capstone cases. (2nd edition) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
State vs. Kelly case file. This case is very similar to the one presented today and will show how the jury voted then.
Case management refers to when a person or people in need require an environmental intervention. The Conrad Hilton Association defines case management as “one of the primary services offered to individuals and families who face multiple challenges, including severe mental illness, addiction, and homelessness.” Case management often helps those who are struggling or who are in need, however, the term tends to be used very loosely within organizations.
According to the Case Management Society of America, case management is "a collaborative process of assessment, planning, facilitation, care coordination, evaluation, and advocacy for options and services to meet an individual's and family's comprehensive health needs through communication and available resources to promote quality, cost effective outcomes" (Case Management Society of America [CMSA], 2010). As a method, case management has moved to the forefront of social work practice. The social work profession, along with other fields of study, recognizes the difficulty of locating and accessing comprehensive services to meet needs. Therefore, case managers work with these
as to whether or not a case is taken up. This is what decides the
This case study is intended to analyze the movie When a Man Loves a Woman, and to provide worst and best case scenarios for treatment. This film depicts a family that is struggling with a family member’s alcoholic dependency. The mother, Alice Green, is a school counselor who has an addiction to alcohol that is causing her to experience problems in her life as a result of her use. Her husband, Michael Green, is an airline pilot that is very protective Alice and often steps in and takes over for Alice, even in her role as a mother. Alice has two children, Jess and Casey, which also bear witness to their mother’s deterioration from alcohol addiction.
They hear claims requiring the rules and settlements of the U.S. Arguments containing “ambassadors and public ministers” are also heard in federal courts. Federal courts trial cases that consist of controversy among several states. They also include “admiralty law, bankruptcy, and habeas corpus issues ("Comparing Federal & State Courts").”
These cases must involve a matter of federal law or be within the control of federal courts. Most cases that come through are ones that the justices can all agree on the decision of the lower court or they agree that it has no significant point of law. The cases that do get brought through must go by the “the rule of four”. This is the rule that four out of the nine justices must think a case should put on the Court’s list of cases to be heard.. However there is still not many cases that make it to court. Most of the cases that do reach the Supreme Court are by writ of certiorari, which means “to be made certain” in Latin. This is an order by the Court directing a lower court to send up the record in a given case for its review. Both sides of a case can petition the Court to issue a writ. If certiorari is denied then the decision of the case lies with the lower courts decision. If the Courts agree to hear the case then is argued in court. The Justices are given information on each case and lawyers of both sides are given thirty minutes to present their argument. After the case has been argued, the majority opinion is what stands as the ultimate decision of the case. The Supreme Court can hear up to twenty four cases in a two week
Questions Presented: This is where the legal issues are stated that the party would like for the appellate court to think about and make a final decision (Statsky, pg. 545).
The appeals courts receive cases that have already been to trial, and the accused has been convicted of the crime. The accused has the opportunity to appeal the
...gal errors that occurred during the trial which could have skewed the result, such as evidence improperly admitted or excluded, or the judge instructing the jury to apply an incorrect interpretation of the law. The “appellee,” on the other hand, will seek to persuade the court that no such errors were made in the lower court or that, if there was an error, it was harmless because it did not affect the outcome. A transcript of the district court proceedings, together with all of the original papers and exhibits, will be forwarded to the court for consideration in deciding the appeal (uscourts.gov, 23).
Criminal law and procedure cases ( No date). Regina v Maloney. http://www.vanuatu.usp.ac.fj/courses/la205_criminal_law_and_procedure_1/cases/R_v_Moloney.html. Accessed at 6/11/10.
...r case. You should include a table of contents, a table of authorities, a jurisdiction statement, questions or issues, a statement of the case, a summary of the argument, the argument, and a conclusion.
Presenting the Case Orally in Court: The Lawyer has to argue about his client’s case in front of the Judge in court.