Carol Wolfe Analysis

503 Words2 Pages

Auditions are the pride of music television and the bane of every auditionee. Every time you open up your browser, the latest and greatest news on our favorite contestants riddles the headlines. Whether it be The Voice, all the way down to the recently-ended American Idol series, we all enjoy a good story of success. Musicals, plays, and operas follow a similar grueling tryout process but typically miss the headlines due to a more local influence, rather than national. The harsh reality that auditionees face, however, is something to be noted. Carol Wolfe (The Soprano, 93), and Diana Griffith (The Contestant, 105) are just two examples of how similar, and different, the branches of the music industry are. While Wolfe resides in New York, Griffith goes to Philly; two major auditioning and performing art cities. New York features a variety of artistic license from Broadway to the CBGB's mentioned in The Frontman (163). Philly, however, welcomes the influence of The Voice, the late American Idol, and The Big Bad Musical, and interactive comedic play in where the audience participates in deciding the events. …show more content…

While on one hand, the thick-accented Russian tells Wolfe that the voice is comparative to a dog, "Sometimes is good dog, sometimes is bad dog. That is all." (93). You either have it that day, or you don't. There isn't much room for sympathy. The judges in Philly tell Griffith, "Thanks, but you're not idol material." (106). In other words, she didn't have a show selling story; she lacked anything dramatic to back her as an interesting contestant. Both of these examples show how the industry has devolved into a business almost. It's all about the views and what's good for them at the time. Both women might have been the next hit in the industry, but neither the coach nor the judges decided it was worth their time to mentor these

More about Carol Wolfe Analysis

Open Document