Carl Sagan and Skeptical Thinking

1178 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The importance of critical thinking in science

Among the tools for skeptical thinking provided by Sagan’s essay are: facts confirmation, authority can be wrong, comparing your hypothesis objectively to others, quantify, chain of argument, and always try to falsify the hypothesis. The foundation of science is built on trust. It is constructed on the fact that scientists using research and precise testing to based data on. Scientific testing uses analytical and statistical methods accurately and respectfully to obtain results (Committee on Science, 2009). Methods include: conducting experiments that will isolate cause and effect on the phenomena being studied, observing and formulating physical laws, and using accurate quantitative measurements (Dr. Richard, Paul ;Dr. Elder, Linda, 2006). It is essential to always apply critical and skeptical thinking when approaching science and to detect when trust is violated. In his essay “The Fine Art of Baloney Detection” Carl Sagan suggests that there is great danger in losing one’s critical thinking skills (Sagan, 1997). According to The Foundation for Critical Thinking critical thinking is the method of using rational analysis to improve thinking in a self-directed process (Defining Critical Thinking, 2011). Sagan presents a set of tools called the “baloney detection kit”. His kit of skeptical thinking relies on examined and explored arguments along with methods differentiating between facts and falsehood that can assist in recognizing the truth. The first tool is finding the evidence from independent sources (4). Data we receive is not free of biases, opinions, and distorted information. People have personal beliefs and ideology; as a result biases can influence actual facts. A message travels from sender to receiver in an eight st... ... middle of paper ... ... we can continue the scientific progress and ensure that professional codes are always the base of all scientific research (Committee on Science, 2009). References Defining Critical Thinking. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org: http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/our-concept-of-critical-thinking/411 BBC News. (2009, October 29). Profile: Hwang Woo-suk. Retrieved from BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4554704.stm Bovée, C. L., & Thill, J. V. (2012). Business Communication Today. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education. Committee on Science, E. a. (2009). On Being a Scientist. Washington: The National Academies Press. Dr. Richard, Paul ;Dr. Elder, Linda. (2006). Scientific Thinking. Dillon Beach, CA: The Foundation of Critical Thinking. Sagan, C. (1997). The Demon-Haunted World. New York: Ballantine Books.

Show More
Related

  • Defending Longino's Social Epistemology

    3566 Words  | 8 Pages

    This discussion focuses on two issues: the relationship between evidence and hypotheses; and, the role of "contextual" values in inquiry. Longino contrasts contextual values with constitutive values. The latter, the "values generated from an understanding of the goals of scientific inquiry," "are the source of the rules determining what constitutes acceptable scientific practice or scientific method" (L1990, 4). That these values influence inquiry is not a problem. But the former, "personal, social, and cultural values," are thought to threaten the integrity of scientific inquiry (L1990, 4-5).

    Read More

  • Summary Of Carl Sagan's The Fine Art Of Baloney Detection

    1387 Words  | 3 Pages

    In today’s world there are always people trying to come up with a new way to explain something. There will always be people trying to pedal a new product or story about an innovative new way to look at things. Some of these ideas will really be ground-breaking, but many of these will be false ideas. Many of them will just be honest mistakes, but just as many will be ideas from people trying to trick other people. Carl Sagan recognizes this and writes about it in his article The Fine Art of Baloney Detection. Within it he describes how he has been vulnerable himself wanting to believe things that people have told him that didn’t seem true, but was what he wanted to hear. He then goes on to talk about how people need to be skeptical about what they are told/read. He has developed a system using the scientific which he calls “Tools for Skeptical Thinking.” These are things that people can do when evaluating a situation or idea to check for “baloney.” I have picked six of these tools to explain in further detail.

    Read More

  • Rhetoric and Stereotype

    1757 Words  | 4 Pages

    Paul, R. and Elder, L., (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking-Concepts and Tools, 5th. Ed., Foundation for Critical Thinking Press: Dillon Beach, CA

    Read More

  • Misconduct Relating To Radiologists And Ultrasound Technologists

    623 Words  | 2 Pages

    Scientific misconduct is currently widely documented as a genuine and significant problem for contemporary science, but too often the participants in the research system and those external who are affected by it-suffer from require of clarity about what constitutes scientific misconduct.

    Read More

  • Exploring the Evolution of Social Criticism and Critical Thinking

    1321 Words  | 3 Pages

    In general, as shown by analysis of the literature, there are three stages of critical thinking research. The first stage was within 1970-1982. During this period, researchers paid their attention to the importance of logical thinking, believing that it formed the core of critical thinking (Reichenbach, 2000). E. Glaser developed training program of critical thinking, which addressed

    Read More

  • The Fine Art of Baloney Detection

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    Critical thinking skills in daily life can be the difference between a good decision and a bad decision. Skeptical thinking, likewise, is an important tool that many people use in order to discern between these decisions, and to make educated choices about their lives and the things that they choose to believe. As a consumer of science, I believe that it is important for people to have a repertoire of skeptical thinking skills, or tools, in order to make decisions deriving from the barrage of information (both false and true) that we absorb on a daily basis. I’ve chosen six skepticism tools from Carl Sagan’s article, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection, that I think are the most important for scientific purposes and for everyday life. These skills include discussing the matter at hand, ignoring position of power, personal detachment from the subject, a sound argument, an understanding of Occam’s Razor, and the ability to test the subject for falsities.

    Read More

  • Critical Thinking

    1147 Words  | 3 Pages

    Scriven, M. & Paul, R. 1987, ‘A Working Definition of critical thinking’, The Critical Thinking Community. Retrieved 18 May from

    Read More

  • Critical Thinking and Decision Making

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    The process of critical thinking requires you to ask more questions of both others and of yourself before a decision or determination is made. In order to successfully evaluate data in a critical manner, you must have a system in place to assess information as it is presented. In any situation whether you are having a conversation, observing others, or material you have read, you must be ready to probe deeper and ask the right question at the right time.

    Read More

  • Skeptical Thinking

    1086 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first tool that I found to be relatively effective in proving that an argument is truthful was Sagan's first tool of providing information that validates the facts (Sagan, 1997). In order to establish that the facts are honest, there must be evidence in the argument that confirms without a doubt that the facts are correct. This is what makes this tool so useful. It takes away some of the doubt you may have had in an idea if the facts in it are backed up with proof. For example, a scientist has a theory, but has no evidence to support it. With no evidence, this scientist has no way of showing that his theory is valid.

    Read More

  • Critical Thinking

    1255 Words  | 3 Pages

    While critical thinking is important in all occupations, it must begin in childhood. Teachers must help their students to develop critical thinking modalities. Critical thinking helps considerably in problem solving. Without critical thinking, one must rely on old and outdated informat...

    Read More

  • Who Determine Ethical Standards

    636 Words  | 2 Pages

    The scientific community, in a sense, is a self-regulating group for scientists. All scientists are a part of the scientific community and hold each other to a strict set of ethical guidelines and standards. They expect each other to rigorously scrutinize scientific ideas for flawed logic, act honestly and with integrity, give credit to others when it is due, and adhere to ethical guidelines. Scientists trust each other to adhere to the strict standards and ethical guidelines they created; if not, there is a case of scientific misconduct. Scientific misconduct happens when scientists fail to fairly scrutinize others’ work, report cases honestly, assign credit, and follow ethical guidelines. However, these cases of scientific misconduct often do not go unnoticed and unpunished for long, as peer review will expose fraudulence. Thus, while the scientific community relies on the honor code to

    Read More

  • Reflection Essay By Malcolm Gladwell

    591 Words  | 2 Pages

    For example, in my included discussion posts and essays regarding the book Outliers, I identified biased and/or skewed evidence that Gladwell employed to make his arguments appear to be stronger than they were. Nevertheless, I still enjoyed Outliers despite Gladwell’s lack of strong evidence to support his claims. Additionally, I used critical thinking when I collected information from sources to compose my research report. For instance, in the “Research Limitations” section of my research report, I discussed biased and insufficient evidence from my sources. Withal it is important to think critically when conducting research because authors can attempt to manipulate readers’ thinking to persuade readers to take their side on a topic. In addition to thinking critically, citing legitimate sources, and unearthing biases I used Anthony Weston’s A Rulebook for Arguments to formulate correlations as I created my research

    Read More

  • The Importance of Critical Thinking in Science

    965 Words  | 2 Pages

    Critical thinking is a very important concept in regards to science, especially since science and the concepts therein have been fluctuating from the time of their origins. As stated in Kirst-Ashman’s book;

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Critical Thinking In The Army Problem Solving Process

    1306 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is not easily recognized is the fact that the very fabric of life is dependent on the ability to think properly and make good decisions. Improper thinking is costly in the quality of life and monetarily. The result of a critical thinker that has worked to cultivate proper thinking skills includes: the ability to ask vital questions and to identify problems with clarity. A critical thinker also collects relevant information while effectively interpreting it, thinks with an open mind, uses alternative systems of thought, and understands how to communicate while working to formulate a strong solution. In summary, critical thinking is self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking. Above all else, the standards of excellence are rigorous, and it entails the prospect of overcoming the challenge of sociocentrism and

    Read More

  • History Of Critical Thinking: The Equation Of Life

    1249 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a direct result of this assumption it is critical that we as educators teach our children/pupils the importance of Critical thinking in these fields of study. For example, elementary math teachers can help students build their critical thinking and problem solving skills by asking them to look for a logical structure when solving math problems and back up their answers with verifiable evidence. “It’s no longer about what a student knows, it’s about what they can do with what they know,” assistant superintendent Kimberly Beck said, according to The Ridgefield Press (Wilson,

    Read More

More about Carl Sagan and Skeptical Thinking

Open Document