Capitalism And Capitalism Research Paper

1753 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Are capitalism and democracy compatible? essay

Capitalism and democracy are the aim of almost the whole world with only several exceptions like Cuba, Iraq, North Korea and Myanmar. It is reasonable why states aspire to achieve both capitalism and democracy. Capitalist concepts have resulted in more increase of social welfare than any other economic system. Likewise, democracy has enabled billions of people to enjoy that welfare by giving them more freedom (Audretsch, 2000). For all the times the capitalist notion has influenced the way of trading and getting wealthy. The theory of modern democracy has been developed and exercised just during recent few centuries. The concepts of democracy and capitalism are considered to be interconnected; however, current critics of liberal democracy try to separate them. Democracy and capitalism have always been either in a tense or totally contradicting relationship. Capitalism feels secure when it is governed by someone possessing capital or identifying with its needs. In sharp contrast to this, democracy is ruled by majority which does not own capital or identify with the demands of capitalism (Delanty, 2012). Many authors argue that capitalism and democracy are always complimentary, and go hand in hand, it is impossible to imagine one without other. All these arguments do not match with reality. Capitalism and democracy can clash in different fields (Delanty, 2012). The following research paper aims to observe whether there are clashes between Democracy and Capitalism, if yes, than in what fields and how they are expressed. I have used secondary data which emphases the relations of these two ideologies and try to reveal the core factors for clash and tension of them, find the real image of these issues. The research question of my paper ... ... middle of paper ... ...distribution of power. This tension is the result of two factors. The first factor is the distribution of power attached to citizenship, which is one of the fundaments of democracy, versus to wealth which is a capitalist value. The second source of tension comes from the role of the civil society (the active citizen vs. the homogenous consumer), the third source is the clash between values as capitalist values not always coincide with democratic values. The other source is the tension between public and private interests and the last one is the tension between debt and independent decision making. Having examined the main differences of democracy and capitalism, their approaches to different issues, escalation and their key roles in countries, I came to a conclusion that clashes between the theories not only exist, but they are in the vital spheres of the countries.

Show More
Related

  • American Colossus The Triumph Of Capitalism Summary

    1553 Words  | 4 Pages

    In American Colossus: The Triumph of Capitalism, 1865 - 1900, H.W. Brands worked to write a book that illustrates the decades after the Civil War, focusing on Morgan and his fellow capitalists who effected a stunning transformation of American life. Brands focuses on the threat of capitalism in American democracy. The broader implications of focusing on capitalism in American democracy is the book becomes a frame work based on a contest between democracy and capitalism. He explains democracy depends on equality, whereas, capitalism depends on inequality (5). The constant changing of the classes as new technologies and ways of life arise affect the contest between democracy and capitalism.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Communism versus Capitalism

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    A Comparison of Communism versus Capitalism Communism versus Capitalism is a debate that has raged on for over two centuries. Whether to allow everyone equal opportunities and to do with those opportunities as they please or to mandate class equality in order to keep peace has in itself been the cause of war. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels saw the working class of the world—the proletariat—being squashed by the greedy business owners—the bourgeoisie. In their view, the bourgeoisie owned too much and the proletariat had no chance to make their own fortunes. In Marx and Engels Communist Manifesto, they propose doing away with private property, nationality, and even countries in order to take power away from the bourgeoisie.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of A World On The Edge By Amy Chua

    1296 Words  | 3 Pages

    She does admit that capitalism and democracy separately are great systems, but squishing them together and throwing them to a young, developing country is inevitably going to lead to disaster. Globalization enthusiasts strongly believe in this strategy because it is a straight-forward and plan devised of two positive systems. However, Chua believes “that the global spread of markets and democracy is a principal aggravating cause of group hatred and ethnic violence throughout the non-Western world” (Chua, 2014, page 13). Rather than becoming angry with the systems that are being implemented, impoverished minorities “backlash” against democracy that favors the market-dominant minority (Chua, 2014, page 15). This type of behavior is extremely common and doesn’t seem to get much attention from the Western world. Chua summarizes her final premise by stating: “In the numerous countries around the world that have pervasive poverty and a market-dominant minority, democracy and markets – at least in the raw, unrestrained forms in which they are currently being promoted – can proceed only in deep tension with each other” (Chua, 2014, page

    Read More

  • Is the EU Democratic?

    1496 Words  | 3 Pages

    In making this argument this essay seeks to five things. Firstly, to define democracy within the contemporary context offering the key characteristics of a modern re...

    Read More

  • Democracy and Conflict: Shaping the American Identity

    513 Words  | 2 Pages

    Democracy has changed the way American’s view certain topics in a positive way. For example, when people came to the “New World,” they wanted freedom from King George III but still have structure, which was provided by democracy. However, democracy can cause disputes between the people within the country, along with those from other countries. Conflict shapes the United States through separating us by our physical differences, condemning other’s political opinions, and disputing over someone’s personal beliefs.

    Read More

  • Intrinsic Human Dignity and Equality in Relation to Liberal Democracy

    1742 Words  | 4 Pages

    If one accepts democracy as a practice, the question is then begged what kind of an institution sustains it? This discussion---though ...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of 'Democracy As A Universal Value' By Amartya Sen

    1528 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his article, Democracy as a Universal Value, Amartya Sen asserts that democracy is a universal value. In order to develop his argument Sen needs to state his definition of democracy and define what he means by universal value. In the course of Sen's argument he gives his view of the relationship between democracy and the economy. He then defends his view of democracy as a universal value against a main argument that deals with cultural differences between regions.

    Read More

  • DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT

    2269 Words  | 5 Pages

    There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...

    Read More

  • essay

    2053 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...the concept of ‘unpolitical democracy’, terms both coined by Rosanvallon (Rosanvallon, 2008: 264). Moreover, as the example of China and Russia illustrate, the road to becoming a full liberal democracy in this century, depends on both political institutions and economic systems (Zakaria, 2004: 91-94).

    Read More

  • Capitalism: Good or Evil?

    1868 Words  | 4 Pages

    Along with the advance and development of the society, capitalism is acquired by lots of countries among the world. But in the meantime, an increasing number of problems are brought to our attention, one of which is the pros and cons of capitalism. As to whether it is a blessing or a curse, people take different attitudes. Capitalism can be traced back to the Middle Ages in Europe, and this economic system has been contributing to the whole human race for centuries. However, people are attaching more importance to what capitalism is really doing to us, and they start wondering if another world is possible. My paper will focus on the question “Is capitalism good or evil”, and discuss different views about it.

    Read More

  • Democracy in Latin America

    2755 Words  | 6 Pages

    Firstly, K. Isbester mentions that democracy has a different meaning for everyone, as some can define democracy as a good aspect for development, on the contrary other believe that it is nothing more than voting after several years. Although, Latin America see democratic g...

    Read More

  • Karl Marx and Capitalism

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Capitalism dominates the world today. Known as a system to create wealth, capitalism’s main purpose is to increase profits through land, labor and free market. It is a replacement of feudalism and slavery. It promises to provide equality and increases living standards through equal exchanges, technological innovations and mass productions. However, taking a look at the global economy today, one can clearly see the disparity between developed and developing countries, and the persistence of poverty throughout the world despite the existence of abundant wealth. This modern issue was predicted and explained a hundred and fifty years ago in Karl Marx’s Capital.

    Read More

  • Capitalism : Capitalism And Capitalism

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    Capitalism at first seems like a beneficial idea that can help to support and drive a society, but upon further inspection, there is a great deal of instability in a Capitalistic society. One of the main outcomes of capitalism is greed. Throughout the recession the rich upper class continued to become astoundingly richer, while the poor lower class became persistently poorer. Moreover, a capitalistic system finds a way to make a profit from anything or from anyone. Alienating workers turning them against each other to focus on the common goal: profit. This is an example of how capitalism estranges employees in the workforce. In this type of capitalistic system employees are forced to compete with one another, therefore, alienating themselves from each other. Which can lead to a feeling of isolation and depression. For example, Carl was a successful business man that served the capitalistic hegemonic society, however, mentally and emotionally the work that he was doing was unfulfilling. Carl said that he would always make decisions based on what he was expected to do; based on what society anticipated of him; this is an example of hegemonic masculinity in everyday life. Eventually, Carl divorced his wife, his kids moved out, and he no longer worked for a successful company. In a capitalist society how does one overcome such alienation? Carl believes the answer lies in mindfulness and self-meditation. Carl argued that an individual should not serve work; should not serve capitalism, but rather that work should serve the individual. He encourages individuals to follow their passion and even to try and monetize their passion, however not all people have a passion that is capable of being monetized. He also argues that individuals shou...

    Read More

  • Communism Vs Democracy

    534 Words  | 2 Pages

    Communism is most widely taken up by Third World countries striving for national independence and sudden social change (Russia, Cuba, and Northern Korea). Forms of democracy however, are usually exercised by countries, which have a long-range goal to succeed, or improve economically (Britain, U.S.A.). Most widely first heard of through Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto, communism hasn’t been around nearly as long as democracy, which is first known to have existed in the city-states of ancient Greece and Rome.

    Read More

  • Why Democracy is the Best Form of Government

    1173 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history different types of instrumental regimes have been in tact so civilizations remained structured and cohesive. As humanity advanced, governments obligingly followed. Although there have been hiccups from the ancient times to modern day, one type of government, democracy, has proven to be the most effective and adaptive. As quoted by Winston Churchill, democracy is the best form of government that has existed. This is true because the heart of democracy is reliant, dependent, and thrives on the populaces desires; which gives them the ability for maintaining the right to choose, over time it adjusts and fixes itself to engulf the prominent troubling issues, and people have the right of electing the person they deem appropriate and can denounce them once they no longer appease them. In this paper, the benefits of democracy are outlined, compared to autocratic communism, and finally the flaws of democracy are illustrated.

    Read More

More about Capitalism And Capitalism Research Paper

Open Document