Capital punishments should not be banned; people believe capital punishment is unconstitutional, that the person on death row actually committed a crime that put them there. There are complaints about the money put out for capital punishment and some think that the death penalty sends the wrong message or that our government is broken. Even though people believe capital punishment should be banned, it should not be banned due to multiple reasons.
In the United States, capital punishment (also known as the death penalty) was first used in colonial times. During the colonial times, people would kill one another without any evidence, just he-said she-said.
After facing many legal challenges in the Supreme Court, in 1972, the Furman v. Georgia case declared capital punishment unconstitutional. The case was ruled unconstitutional, because capital punishment violated the Eighth Amendment, cruel and unusual punishment. During the Furman v. Georgia case, the court took note that there were no objective standards for when capital punishment could be given. Justice Potter Stewart described capital punishment as “cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual.” He meant that capital punishment, itself, is not unconstitutional, but the way it is applied makes it cruel and unusual. The Court reversed its decision in Gregg v. Georgia four years later. Troy Gregg was found guilty of murder and armed robbery. He also was sentenced to death. Troy asked the Court to review the Furman case, and rule capital punishment itself unconstitutional. The Court refused to look over the case. The Court found that Georgia’s system for applying capital punishment was judicious. Gregg had two trials; one to determine guilt...
... middle of paper ...
...unishment is to prevent the crime from happening again. The parole system currently is a waste of time, it seems as though there are repeating criminals. Prisons across the country face the problem of too many prisoners and not enough space and resources. Each prisoner requires a portion of housing, clothing, food, and other needs. When you eliminate the death penalty, it means that prisoners must be housed for life. It adds to the problem of an overcrowded prison system. Taxpayers pay for the resources and the cost of death. The more criminals in prison for life, the more taxpayers pay every year for each one.
Some think that capital punishment is also closure for the victim’s family, while others believe it just gives sympathy to the accused. Even though, killing the convicted will not bring the victim back it gives the family closure, meaning an eye for an eye.
.... The term “closure” in the legal context does not have a true definition because most of the people define it in their own words; the families are lead to believe that with the death penalty, all of their problems will go away and that they will experience a sense of relief and the majority don’t. That is why most families that have lost a family member to murder are against capital punishment simply because it fails in accomplishing the promise of closure. The victims’ family are not the only ones that undergo suffering; so does the family of the murderer and they feel about the same as the victims’ family when it comes to losing someone they love dearly; although, little is known of them and they are seen as unpleasant people at times. So is closure really a good enough “excuse” to execute a human being or does it bring with it more problems to deal with?
All through the history of our country, we have sentenced people to death as the last form of punishment for grave crimes. Even before our founding fathers wrote the constitution and its amendments, the colonies had public executions. Capital punishment
In conclusion, capital punishment is an unjustifiable act used to punish criminals. The death penalty is not only expensive, but it also lowers our morality. Desmond Tutu once said, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice." America is meant to be a country that symbolizes justice and the act of the government killing people, regardless of whatever reason, contradicts that. Therefore, the United States should outlaw capital punishment and convert to an alternative punishment, such as life imprisonment without parole, where the criminal can spend the rest of his life locked in a cell and living with what they did, to become the justifiable country it’s known as.
The capital punishment has been cited as a reasonable sentence by those who advocate for retribution. This is essentially when it comes to justice so that people take full responsibility for their individual actions. Studies have proved that the decision to take away life of a person because they committed a certain crime serves to perpetuate the crime in question. It also serves to enhance the progress of organized and violent crime. It has been noted that various flaws in the justice system has led to the wrong conviction of innocent people. On the other hand, the guilty have also been set free, and a plethora of several cases has come up when a critical look at the capital punishment has been undertaken. Killers hardly kill their victims deliberately, but they probably act on anger, passion, or impulsively. In this regard, it is not proper to convict them exclusively without
Main Point 1: Imagine someone that has been accused of murder and sentenced to death row has to spend almost 17-20 years in jail and then one day get kill. Then later on the person that they killed was not the right person.
that society has a moral obligation to protect the safety and the welfare of its
Hopefully I’ve made the point that the death penalty is useless except for delivering some sort of closure to a victims’ loved ones, through this type of closure is morally wrong, and can be achieved through life imprisonment of the murderer. And because capital punishment is not an effective deterrent, because life imprisonment is a better option, and because the innocent wouldn’t have to die; capital punishment should be abolished.
Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder.
While we may all want murders off the street, the problem we come to face is that capital punishment is being used for vengeance or as a deterrent. Capital punishment has been used worldwide, not only by the governments to instill fear, but to show that there are repercussions to ones actions. From the time we are born, we are taught to learn the difference between right and wrong. It is ingrained in our brains, what happens to people that do bad things? Capital punishment is renowned for being the worst thing that could be brought amongst ones life.
The death penalty has been around for centuries. It dates back to when Hammurabi had his laws codified; it was “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. Capital punishment in America started when spies were caught, put on trial and hung. In the past and still today people argue that, the death penalty is cruel, unusual punishment and should be illegal. Yet many people argue that it is in fact justifiable and it is not cruel and unusual. Capital punishment is not cruel and unusual; the death penalty is fair and there is evidence that the death penalty deters crime.
To start off, I will discuss the history of the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. Death sentences were carried out by such means as crucifixion, boiling, beheading, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement.
... capital punishment is unconstitutional and inhumane, given that the 8th Amendment can interfere with the ruling of every case. The 8th amendment is one extremely important factor in most criminal cases, besides the evidence and witnesses. As has been mentioned, there are numerous reasons why the death penalty should be taken away. It is very costly, and the money that is spent can be used for problems that take place in today’s society. The judicial system has many things to work on as far as getting appropriate evidence and making sure they don’t put an innocent man on death row. By taking away capital punishment, people sentenced to life without out parole will actually understand that committing a crime does not send anyone to a blissful place. Who wants to sit in slumber for the rest of his life? Let’s take a stand and eliminate Capital Punishment as an option.
Capital punishment has been a controversial topic in association to any person condemned to a serious committed crime. Capital punishment has been a historical punishment for any cruel crime. Issues associated to things such as the different methods used for execution in most states, waste of taxpayers’ money by performing execution, and how it does not serve as any form of justice have been a big argument that raise many eyebrows. Capital punishment is still an active form of deterrence in the United States. The history of the death penalty explains the different statistics about capital punishment and provides credible information as to why the form of punishment should be abolished by every state. It is believed
Crime is everywhere. Wherever we look, we find criminals and crime. Criminals have become a part of our daily lives. Does this mean we let them be the darkness of our society? No, definitely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we cannot ignore it. Getting the rightly accused to a just punishment is very important. Some criminals commit a crime because they have no other option to survive, but some do it for fun. I do not advocate death penalty for everybody. A person, who stole bread from a grocery store, definitely does not deserve death penalty. However, a serial killer, who kills people for fun or for his personal gain, definitely deserves death penalty. Death penalty should continue in order to eliminate the garbage of our society. Not everybody deserves to die, but some people definitely do. I support death penalty because of several reasons. Firstly, I believe that death penalty serves as a deterrent and helps in reducing crime. Secondly, it is true that death penalty is irreversible, but it is hard to kill a wrongly convicted person due to the several chances given to the convicted to prove his innocence. Thirdly, death penalty assures safety of the society by eliminating these criminals. Finally, I believe in "lex tallionis" - a life for a life.
Capital Punishment has always been a big question in peoples lives when asking how to deal with a prisoner dealing with life imprisonment. These prisoners have to put their lives in the hands of the judge and jury when putting out the punishment they get for the crime they committed. People have to decide if the crime the committed is worth ending someones life then and there or letting them live their life in prison. The death penalty to me is a horrible but needed part of life to prove a point to people who think getting away with crimes worthy of this punishment is worth doing. It puts the fear of god into people cause you are playing with god and your life when you have to decide between life and prison and lethal injection. Many states are still deciding whether or not they want their state to use the death penalty and that has kicked up a lot of controversy in there states population. Many different people on both sides of the debate on how to handle these types of criminals based on the crimes they have committed.