Metzger, B. (1997). The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. New York.
It was deemed that the books of the New Testament that are authentically apostolic in nature were included in the Bible. This strict appraisal process used by the church fathers to determine the legitimacy of certain books in the bible is the reason why scripture, once it becomes part of church canon it is incorruptible. Furthermore, because tradition stems from scriptural interpretation that it can be corruptible as it relies on the judgment of human beings, whose interpretations may be driven by internal
Gundry, Robert H., Ph.D. A Survey of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1970.
From a theological point of view, for Christians and Jews, these writings represent the word of God and they are highly respected as such, not only during the worship, but in the everyday’s life of those who believe.
^ John Arthur Thomas Robinson (1919-1983). "Redating the New Testament". Westminster Press, 1976. 369 halaman. ISBN 10: 1-57910-527-0; ISBN 13: 978-1-57910-527-3
The concept of scripture is the formation of the writings of the Bible as the Canon. At first, scripture was passed down orally until finally the culture was pressured to begin to write everything down. They had positive and negative pressures with this decision including, people wanting their family members for many generations to know their experiences to wars or natural disasters. God’s covenants with humankind show us his unconditional love for us in that he would do anything to help make us believe in him. Scripture arose in Judaism by merely the formation and later destruction of the nation of Israel. The formation of Israel was the need for court records in 1,000 BCE. The destruction of Israel was the exile of the people into Babylon
“Douglas, J. D., and Merrill C. Tenney.” “Authority.” NIV Compact Dictionary of the Bible. Grand
Bacon, Benjamin W. "The Canon of the New Testament" The Biblical World, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Feb., 1903), Published by: The University of Chicago Press. Web. Available at:
The Bible is the Word of God. It is God’s message for all of humanity. The Bible is divine revelation, breathed by God, written by men, and is applicable for all of humanity. In today’s world, there is controversy over if the inerrancy of the Bible and inspiration of the writers; however, there is little controversy over the simple fact of the New Testament, as a whole, itself. The Bible is not one long book, but rather, the Bible is a book consisting of various letters and manuscripts from throughout the history of mankind. A human being wrote every book of today’s Bible during various times in history. However, there is a classic divide in the books—Old and New Testament. The Old Testament is considered the Jewish Bible. This Bible was the original Scriptures during the time of Jesus and was the original Scriptures for many years. Therefore, not much controversy has risen over the assembly of the Old Testament.
In order to determine if the New Testament is God’s Word one must understand how the New Testament came together. It is very important to understand the terms, which make up the process and the physical existence of the New Testament and the Bible for that matter. When making reference to the Bible many people use different terms to mean the same thing.
... to paleographers, historians who study ancient texts, there are over 5,800 manuscripts of the New Testament (compared to only seven existing manuscripts of Plato's writings) dating between second and fifteenth centuries AD.. The original documents for the New Testament date between 50 AD and 95 AD. Overall there are more than 25,000 early translation of the bible partial and complete manuscript copies of the New Testament. Furthermore, there are also some 86,000 quotations from the early church fathers and with these quotations alone scholars could reconstruct the whole New testament if we did not have a single copy of the Bible(Evidence that demands a verdict p 50). No other ancient book has this remarkable preservation and documentation and as these ancient manuscripts (the popular handbook of archaeology and the bible-Joseph Holden and Norman Geisler) 102-109.
Why does the New Testament contain some books, but not others? Why do we have Timothy, but not the likes of Judas? What makes Ezra worthy but not Judith, Tobit or the Maccabees? There have been a variety of answers to this question proposed by laymen. Not all of them possessing merit. Perhaps some can recall the story in which some Christians claimed that at the First Council of Nicaea they took all the books they had and set them upon a table. In some renditions the books that fell off where not included and in others renditions they closed the door and the gospel magically appeared on the table while the others vanished. Neither of these accounts are of course accurate. In this paper we’ll have an examination of the real history, if not brief, of the New Testament Canon.
The gathering of books of the New Testament was arisen in the end of the second century, A.D. The church influential established books they believed were built on eyewitness versions of the events we read today, while discarding many Christian texts.
Lea, Thomas D. The New Testament: Its background and Message. Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1996.