Introduction Key ethical issue • The key ethical issue is whether or not the Canadian mining company should implement the continuation of mining on the grounds of Peru’s local town according to each theory in ethics. Argument For this case I will choose to recommend that the executives in the Canadian head office decide to cancel and remove the mining operations in Peru. I strongly advise this because the Peruvians will be able to accommodate to changes if given notice ahead of time and it will not affect the company to any public relations risk nor the people living in the affected mining area for any further environmental degradation. For the citizens of Peru living in this local town working for the Canadian mine company, it would be …show more content…
In this case, the utilitarianism view would be the fact that the Canadian mining firm will gain or lose from the decision made to have the mine removed. This can also benefit the Canadian mining firm rather than the citizens that are living in Peru leaving a positive impact on the company. Moreover, a great deal of satisfaction is given to the firm because they are saving on costs for their mining company in the long run. As a result, many of these ideas display how utilitarianism can be contributed to the decision of having the mining firm …show more content…
Justice can be viewed as being treated fairly, which the Canadian mining firm has proven through the amount of experiences they have given to their employees over the amount of time they have worked and will be given notice also if this idea is implemented to accommodate them to look for other related work outside of the town. Categorical imperative also contributes as a major factor into the decision of having the mine operation cancelled since the Canadian head office has taken into account the considerations of how people will be affected negatively in their health within such a hazardous environment. Lastly, virtue supports the argument due to the fact that they are acting out of courtesy for the safety of their employee’s and the company which illustrates that both sides can win. Thus, the Canadian head office should have the cancellation and removal of the mining firm for their best interest as well as the Peruvian
Utilitarianism is a movement in ethics which began in the late eighteenth centaury and is primarily associated with the English philosopher Jeremy Bentham and was later adapted and fully developed by John Stuart Mill in the ninetieth century. . The theory states that we should try to achieve ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory of ethics. Teleological theories of ethics look at the consequences to decide whether an action is right or wrong. Utilitarianism is defined as a doctrine that the useful is the good and that the determining consideration of right conduct should be the usefulness of it consequences: specifically: a theory that the aim of action should be the largest possible
This specific situation can analyzed to any extent that it allows. Theories and ethics can be applied to any problem but it goes to show that one must apply them carefully and orderly.
Utilitarianism is based on equality and utility as well as on the hedonistic versions of utilitarianism that distribute pleasure and pain or happiness and unhappiness. In the paper, Savior of the Goobians, Alex Bokhart discusses how a utilitarian approach can resolve the environmental injustices that are being experienced by a particular population (Bokhart, 2016). For through a utilitarian approach one can determine the vulnerability and need elements for each different recipient of environmental justice through weighing the basic pros and cons of, in this case study, the implementation of the Keystone XL pipeline. While Utilitarianism worked well in that particular paper, Bokhart’s case study was analyzing environmental pollution on the whole human race of a planet. Therefore, the pros and cons were much simpler unlike our specialized case between two communities within the whole human race: Native Americans and other U.S. Citizens and
It is obvious that executives and managers at both British Petroleum and Transocean have changed the civil right statement “by any means necessary” to reflect their desire to make profits. The unethical behavior that has been engrained within both business cultures calls in the question the ethics of all powerful oil based companies. Leaders must be attentive and adhere to all safety and maintenance concerns. The damage and loss that was incurred could have been avoided if executives would have made more logical and ethically based decisions. Leaders should be able to recognize their psychological tendencies and correct them when making ethical decisions for their businesses. Through striving to make ethical decisions, organizations can set the tone for company morale and success.
Canadian Natural Resources is an oil and gas exploration, development and production company with its corporate head office in Calgary, Alberta. CNR is Canada’s largest oil and gas company and one of the world’s largest independent oil and gas producer. CNR was founded in Calgary, Alberta in 1989 but there is no specific man or women who have found the company. The company started off with drilling shallow gas basin, which is a big contributor of their success. Slowly they shifted into bitumen and crude oil. CNR headquarters are located in Calgary, Alberta and all the other offices are located in Alberta except for one, Fort St.John which is located in British Columbia. Their factories and offices are located in Alberta because Alberta is the
Utilitarianism is a concept that focuses on the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. It revolves around usefulness and benefit while focusing on a larger population. It is highly outcome based so to do a thorough analysis one has to weigh the outcomes
In this paper I will argue that Utilitarianism is a weak argument. According to John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism is defined as the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Happiness is pleasure and absence of pain (Mill, 114). At first glance the Utility perspective seems logical, however it often conflicts with justice and morality. I will begin by presenting the idea that good consequences do not always determine the right thing to do. Then I will provide the counterargument that utilitarians can bite the bullet. Next I will explain that Utilitarianism is too demanding for anyone to live by, and finally provide the counterarguments from the Utilitarianism perspective.
The ethical theory of utilitarianism has one basis, one must chose the action that will contribute to the greatest good; the greatest good for the greatest number. In any instance one may ask, which action will make the most people happy and how long? As a method
In the Huaorani case the government of Ecuador does the exact opposite. It does not only ignore the plight of the natives but also it is first in line to push for the invasion of their land. The government depends on oil mining for almost half of its revenue hence it has outlawed any attempt by the Huaorani to obstruct the oil companies. It is ironic that the government does not plan to share the projected revenue of two billion dollars with the natives. Under the Ecuadorian law, the state retains all the subsurface mineral rights (Kane, 1993,
The Importance of Mining Industry The importance of mining is definitely significant to Canada. Mining, is an important industry, and Canadians are very advanced in their mining technology, but during the mining process, there is certain level of pollution produced. The Canadian government and the mining companies have very good plans and controls toward this problem, while ensuring the smooth running of the industries, and also helping to create strong economy and employment. The world of today could not exist without mineral products. Canada produces about 60 minerals and ranks first among producing countries1. As well, Canada is the largest exporter of minerals, with more than 20 per cent of production shipped to world markets2.
Examining the case with the Utilitarian mindset, we consider the overall positivity of the action vs the positivity of the alternative. In this case, what is the measure
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that approaches moral questions of right and wrong by considering the actual consequences of a variety of possible actions. These consequences are generally those that either positively or negatively affect other living beings. If there are both good and bad actual consequences of a particular action, the moral individual must weigh the good against the bad and go with the action that will produce the most good for the most amount of people. If the individual finds that there are only bad consequences, then she must go with the behavior that causes the least amount of bad consequences to the least amount of people. There are many different methods for calculating the utility of each moral decision and coming up with the best
As a philosophical approach, utilitarianism generally focuses on the principle of “greatest happiness”. According to the greatest happiness principle, actions that promote overall happiness and pleasure are considered as right practices. Moreover, to Mill, actions which enhance happiness are morally right, on the other hand, actions that produce undesirable and unhappy outcomes are considered as morally wrong. From this point of view we can deduct that utilitarianism assign us moral duties and variety of ways for maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain to ensure “greatest happiness principle”. Despite all of moral duties and obligations, utilitarian perspective have many specific challenges that pose several serious threats which constitute variety of arguments in this essay to utilitarianism and specifically Mill answers these challenges in his work. These arguments can be determinated and analyzed as three crucial points that seriously challenges utilitarianism. The first issue can be entitled like that utilitarian idea sets too demanding conditions as to act by motive which always serves maximizing overall happiness. It creates single criterion about “being motived to maximize overall happiness” but moral rightness which are unattainable to pursue in case of the maximizing benefit principle challenges utilitarianism. Secondly, the idea which may related with the first argument but differs from the first idea about single criterion issue, utilitarianism demands people to consider and measuring everything which taking place around before people practice their actions. It leads criticism to utilitarianism since the approach sees human-beings as calculators to attain greatest happiness principle without considering cultural differ...
Utilitarianism can be described as an ethical theory that states if the consequences of an action
Utilitarianism is defined to be “the view that right actions are those that result in the most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone involved” (Vaughn 64). In other words, for a utilitarian,