Ethics in the Workplace "Ethics are personal and, at the same time, a very public display of your attitudes and beliefs. It is because of ethical beliefs that we humans may act differently in different in situations" (University of Phoenix, 2007). Poor ethical choices in the workplace can truly hurt people. Poor ethics can damage their career, happiness, and quality of living. Not only can these actions hurt the individual who has made the bad choices, but also most often it hurts the innocent.
Even college students seem to have become caught up in the wave where studies show significant increases in cheating on tests (Robbins et al.). Concern over this perceived decline in ethical standards is being addressed by organizations, and companies are relying on Human Resource (HR) to build an ethical culture. Human Resource departments are creating codes of ethics, introducing ethics training programs and hiring ethics officers. Why is ethics important to Human Resources? When employees in organizations make decisions to act unethically, they affect not only the company itself, but also its shareholders, employees and customers.
The unethical behavior of managers can cause a domino effect and lead to employees acting unethical and then damaging their relationships with customers. Many times in the workplace, people find themselves at a loss for what to do in certain situations. This can relate to the ethical dilemma principle which is defined as “the quandary people find themselves in when they have to decide if they should act in a way that might help another person or group and is the right thing to do, even though it might go against their own self-interest” (Jones, George 78). Most
but have a gap in communication with the union.which makes the situation complex. Stakeholder Perspectives/Ethical Dilemmas Global Communications' management infringed on the rights of their technology workers union by not involving the union in the decision making process, and the union is now threatening to take legal actions against Global Communications. Global Communications also faces another dilemma based on their decision to outsource. GC has always been known caring for her employees, and placing a great value on them also. However by carrying out their outsourcing strategy, employee's morale will at an all-time low because both the union workers and the company's employees now face either job losses or a salary cut.
The employees are first to experience negative consequences of poor management, then clients. an angry manager cannot create an exciting work atmosphere. That leads to failure of the management, and he can take it out personally on the employee. Another sign of a bad manager is hiring low-skilled workers. This has to do with feeling threatened by a new employee who can outshine him, and possibly take his position in the
Clearly, numerous of empirical studies displayed benefits of being perceived as an ethical business. Researchers found a significant relationship between corporate financial performance and ethical performance (Floyd et al., 2013). Thus, companies that are ethical leaders attract and retain the best employees, increase sales and customer ... ... middle of paper ... ...ess of the nation where they are headquartered, face this kind of ethical dilemma (Jondle et al., 2014). Thus, as business becomes increasingly global, with more and more corporations penetrating overseas markets where cultures and ethical traditions vary, these cross-cultural questions will occur more frequently (Jondle et al., 2014). Elements of Ethical Character.
Describe an ethical problem you have encountered or might encounter in your workplace. How would you approach the problem and reach a decision to solve it? Business ethics defines how a company integrates core values - such as honesty, trust, respect, and fairness - into its policies, practices, and decision-making. Business ethics is, in part, the attempt to think clearly and deeply about ethical issues in business and to arrive at conclusions that are supported by the strongest possible arguments. Ethical principles are the rules of conduct that derive from ethical values.
The environment set by a leaders can have a positive or negative impact on the staff and organization. Unfortunately, the lack of leadership training by those in leadership positions can lead to a dysfunctional and toxic organization. Understanding the impact of dysfunctional leaders on an organization is key to understanding how to correct the action. The impact of dysfunctional leaders has a major effect on the staff, according to Jha and Jha (2015), “The consequences of dysfunctional leadership behaviour are beyond measure. Organizations lose out on competitiveness due to withholding of discretionary efforts on the part of the employees as a result of being victimized by their toxic bosses without any valid grounds.
There is significant relationship between unfairness with employees’ motivation that influences the downward or upswing of motivation level by the employees. At the same time, conflict may arise between the staffs who are previously worked in the company and the new member of staff who has been hired because of the family relationship. So, it strongly can be as a disaster to the company and the company itself because they will be difficult to work each other. As we know, to gain or maximize the profits for the comp... ... middle of paper ... ...ure to the relatives. The situation becomes worse especially when the company manage by family group where the practice of nepotism will simultaneously be inherited to the next management generations.
Top leaders of this organization believe that the micromanaging style of leadership will improve performance, and achieve organization excellence. However, micromanaging has had a very negative effect. Managers of each department struggle with effectively leading and micromanaging employees. “Micromanaging damages engagement, saps the initiative of even motivated team members, undermines confidence, quashes innovation, and drives way top talent” (Earley, 2009, p. 5). The organization has too many chiefs, and the close monitoring of employees makes them feel discouraged and unimportant, which promotes low productivity.