Campaign Finance Reform: Constitutional Amendment

1281 Words6 Pages
While an imbalance has always been prevalent in the classes of American society, recent decisions in the Supreme Court favoring less campaign finance control have disregarded the growing gap between the upper echelon and the lower class. The U.S. Supreme Court has fully given way to elitist rule, allowing the wealthy to wield their natural tenacities to grow dollar bills from rocks and plant them kindly into the pockets of political candidates that would support their hidden agendas of clandestine rule and continued hegemonification of the lower class. As recent as April 2, 2014 in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the U.S. Supreme court released the contribution limits placed on the wealthy under the pretense of free speech as provided by the first amendment. In order to prevent further dissemination to the balance of equality amongst the classes within the United States, it is imperative for Congress to start the implementation of a detailed Constitutional Amendment defining strict regulations regarding funding towards political campaigns, as well as a clear definition to the inherent differences between an individual and a corporate entity or “faction.” Reformation on the funding of political campaigns has been an ongoing battle between trying to create an equal and democratic balance of representation for the people and the rich and powerful who have succeeded in using the media to control those people. With The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1972 and the establishment of the Federal Election Commission in 1975, steps were taken to hold the wealthy and public officials accountable for corruption and to try and prevent it. Though the act could be viewed as a positive sign of peaceful evolution in the direction o... ... middle of paper ... ...4. Gilpatrick, Breanne. “Removing Corporate Campaign Finance Restrictions in Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission, 130 S. CT. 876 (2010).” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 34.1 (2011): 405-420. Legal Collection. Web. 29 Mar. 2014. Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission. 572 U.S. ___ (2014). U.S. Supreme Court. 2014. . 1-43. Print. Orelus, Pierre W. Rethinking Race, Class, Language, and Gender: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky and Other Leading Scholars. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2011. Ebook Library. Web. 05 Apr. 2014. Smith, Bradley. “The Myth of Campaign Finance Reform.” National Affairs. Issue 2 (2010): 9 pp. 30 March 2014 < http://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-myth-of- campaign-finance-reform>.

More about Campaign Finance Reform: Constitutional Amendment

Open Document