1. If Buck could speak, write some dialogue of what he would say to John Thorton and describe why you think this is what he would say to John. John Thorton had, for a second, vanished from Buck's view. Buck panicked as he frantically searched through the camp for the familiar sent that only John Thorton had. Once Buck noticed John near the river, he dashed towards him as his nerves were now at ease. "I cherish you for everything you have rendered for my prosperity. I will eternally be in your debt, and I will forever continue to express my gratitude towards you" promised Buck. "Buck, you barbarous beast, I appreciate your fervent dedication, and I ensure you that I will do the identical" assured John Thorton. Buck would say this to John Thorton because, he accomplishes anything for the man, even if it means endangering his life. His concern for Thoton is vigorously devoted because Buck's anxiety is that John Thorton will diminish from his life. 2. What does the phrase, "Kill or be killed, eat or be eaten," mean? The phrase means that in the primordial course of nature you ha...
that he is a brave man. As soon as his wife is accused, John quickly
John was laying on the ground. Thoreau cradled him. That scene was good reason for
The novel, The Call of the Wild, follows a four-year-old mixed Saint Bernard and Scottish shepherd, named Buck. In the beginning of the story, Buck lives in the home of Judge Miller, located at Santa Clara Valley, California. In Santa Clara, Buck lives a luxurious life. At the time of the story, gold is discovered in the North. With this discovery, the value of large dogs like Buck escalated dramatically. The dog’s value was due most to their ability to haul heavy sleds through the abundant snow. Unfortunately, Judge Miller’s servant, Manuel steals Buck to sell him to a band of dog-nappers to pay for his accumulating gambling debts. The ring of thieves that bought Buck is gaining a secure banking by trading the dog to northern executives. Buck, who has had an easy life so far, does not adapt well to the terrain as the other canines do. Buck does not easily tolerate the confinement and mistreatment of his new authority. Buck’s gains the misconception, which then is an aide that any man with a club is a dominator and must be obeyed.
To escape the reality of this undeniably complicated world, would be something so distant to even consider, yet it would not be impossible to. The film “Where the Wild Things Are” unconsciously portrays an attempt at this escape through the leading role, Max and his fellow Wild Things. Max’s Journey could be considered a quest for sanity and morality in the sense that his everyday life initiated him to escape this reality and experience a much preferable life in which would be considered his safe space, where he was unknowingly faced with his own deepest aspects of himself through the personalities and conflicts of others leading him to further learn his place in the world.
He states “I asked each American to consider what he would do for his country and I asked the steel companies. In the last 24 hours we had their answer” to show the differences between the actions of the people and those of the steel companies. During this period, most Americans gave up many of their comforts and requests for raises in order to support the economy and the greater good of all. However, the steel companies acquisitively raised their prices in an effort to gain more money; completely ignoring the needs of fellow Americans. Kennedy’s contrast of these actions again serves to appeal to the humanity of the steel tycoons, by demonstrating the beneficial effects Americans are having on the economy and the differing, adverse effects of the steel companies, in order to convince them to change their ways and help their fellow
John's eyes fluttered open and he cautiously surveyed his surroundings. Where was he taken? Who knocked him unconscious and carried him from his solitude at the lighthouse? He did not have to wait long for his answer, when he saw his friend standing over him, shaking him to awareness.
The Call of the Wild, on the surface, is a story about Buck, a four- year old dog that is part Shepherd and part St. Bernard. More importantly, it is a naturalistic tale about the survival of the fittest in nature. Throughout the novel, Buck proves that he is fit and can endure the law of the club, the law of the fang, and the laws of nature.
-- William Clark, Superintendent of Indian Affairs negotiated treaties (agreements) with the Kansa and Osage Indians
In 1992, after graduating from college Christopher McCandless donated all his money to charity, left his apartment, and burned the money in his wallet. Shortly after he set off to travel the United States to eventually end up dead in Alaska. Some people question his sanity for leaving behind his life. I believe that he left because his mental state had taken severe damage from the abusive household he grew up in, he was trying to leave behind what he grew up in to find something new. I also think that he was very arrogant for leaving his family without saying goodbye because he only cared about saving himself and escaping from reality.
In the book Into The Wild the main character Alex did some questionable things. Although he did some unusual things, he was sane. Alex was well educated and highly respected by everyone who knew him.
Through journal entries, highlighted passages, stories of people’s encounters, and personal experiences, author Jon Krakauer attempts to reconstruct the life of a young transcendentalist man named Chris Johnson McCandless in the biographical novel Into the Wild. McCandless was a 24-year-old young man who completely severed his connection to the world, his family, and all of his tangible possessions in hope to survive off the land in Alaska. In the two years that led to his Alaskan Odyssey McCandless created a new life for himself and lived by the name Alexander Supertramp, in hope to leave his old life behind. Krakauer starts his novel “Into the Wild” by bluntly revealing to the audience that he had only survived 113 days and his remains were found two weeks after preceding his death. Rather than focusing on McCandless death, Krakauer focused on his life. Although Krakauer is biased, he proves to be a credible biographer and proves the assertions he made in his authors note.
Cormac McCarthy builds the character of John Grady through the use of blood. A person whose youth is bleeding away and through his growth he has learned to stand up for what he loves.
The Call of the Wild, by Jack London, is a classic piece of American literature. The novel follows the life of a dog named Buck as his world changes and in turn forces him to become an entirely new dog. Cruel circumstances require Buck to lose his carefree attitude and somewhat peaceful outlook on life. Love then enters his life and causes him to see life through new eyes. In the end, however, he must choose between the master he loves or the wildness he belongs in.
Chris McCandless and Buck serve as examples of the archetype of the wild through their experiences of leaving where they feel most comfortable and answering the call of the wild. They show that each experience is inimitable because the wild is unique to every individual. For Buck, the wild is a place outside of civilization and his dependence on man, where the external threats of nature exist and he must prove himself as a true animal with instincts for survival. In McCandless' case, the place outside of civilization is actually an escape from his fears because the wild for him is in relationships, where the threat of intimacy exists and he must learn to trust others for happiness. This is because for each of us, the wild is what we fear, a place outside of our comfort zone and, as McCandless' experience shows, not necessarily a physical place. To render to the call of the wild we must leave everything that makes us feel protected, and we must make ourselves completely vulnerable to the wild. McCandless and Buck show that in order to successfully respond to the call of the wild we must relinquish control and drop our guards, until ultimately the fear subsides and we find peace with ourselves as well as with our environments.
In addition to the above, John was a go-getter and a calculated risk taker. Even though his act of abduction seemed impulsive, a scene before his act saw him thinking intently about what he was going to do and how exactly he was going to achieve it. He had one goal in mind which was to save his son and he pressed towards that with focus a...