California’s Proposition 19

2199 Words5 Pages

Is California’s Proposition 19, “The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010,” reefer madness or reefer rationality? In recent years, many states across the nation have passed medical marijuana laws. California however, is preparing to take an even more progressive stance towards the substance and pass a bill that would outright legalize marijuana for recreational use. Proposition 19 would’ve make it lawful for any individual over the age of 21 to possess up to an ounce of cannabis, in a similar manner to alcohol. Although the initiative failed to pass, another similar bill is almost guaranteed to be on the ballot again in 2012. In voting yes on such a proposition, proponents of the bill state that voters have a chance to help balance the budget, and create much needed revenue for the state. Others say it will help to reduce crime, improve the judicial system, and better protect minors. Opponents to legalization argue that long-term or abusive use of marijuana can be harmful to a person's health and well-being, as well as pose a threat to public safety due to drugged-driving. This opposing side also consists of those worried about increased drug trafficking of the Mexican cartels. A third side to the argument are those who are current medical users of marijuana and wish to keep marijuana illegal for recreational use. They wish to keep the system as it is now and only have marijuana legal for only those with serious ailments. Each side of the argument uses rhetorical strategies effectively to target our concerns, create emotional support, promote fear and create a compelling logical argument that speaks for a large portion of the population.

Many people on the pro side of the argument will attempt to ...

... middle of paper ...

...the hearts of the audience. While some may feel legalizing marijuana is good economically and in regards to law enforcement, others believe the effects on society are not worth it. I personally believe that marijuana should be legalized, however I do agree with those opposed to this bill in particular. As a registered medical cannabis patient in California, I too believe that this bill is the path to corporatization of the cannabis industry, and it would sadden me to see friends and relatives lose their businesses due to a corporate takeover. I think there will be a better bill in the future, with more freedom and less detrimental effect to the current medical marijuana collectives and initiatives already in place in the state. All in all, I don’t think this debate will be solved in the near future, as there is too much of a disagreement between the opposing sides.

Open Document