Calculus, Leibniz and Newton

2305 Words5 Pages

It is interesting to note that the ongoing controversy concerning the so-called conflict between Wilhelm Gottfried Leibniz and Isaac Newton is one that does not bare much merit. Whether one came up with the concepts of calculus are insignificant since the outcome was that future generations benefited. However, the logic of their clash does bear merit.

In proposing that he was the first inventor, Leibniz states that "it is most useful that the true origins of memorable inventions be known, especially of those that were conceive not by accident but by an effort of meditation. The use of this is not merely that history may give everyone his due and others be spurred by the expectation of similar praise, but also that the art of discovery may be promoted and its method become known through brilliant examples.”

Newton on the other had would not allow himself to be usurped by stating that “second inventors have no right. Whether Mr Leibniz found the Method by himself or not is not the Question… We take the proper question to be,… who was the first inventor of the method." In addition, he continued on by stating that "to take away the Right of the first inventor, and divide it between him and that other, would be an Act of Injustice."

The argument in this paper that even though the onus of the discovery of calculus lies with Isaac Newton, the credit goes to Leibniz for the simple fact that he was the one who published his works first. Appending to this is the fact that the calculus wars that ensue was merely and egotistic battle between humans succumbing to their bare primal instincts. To commence, a brief historical explanation must be given about both individuals prior to stating their cases.

On January 4, 1643, Isaac New...

... middle of paper ...

...tics is a sufficient condition for its antecedent. Furthermore, both forms of mathematics do have a non-symmetrical relationship. Simply put, a concept derived from abstract mathematical methods can bear this same concept to a practical application; the reverse may or may not be possible. The reason being is that in abstraction, there is unlimited possibility and some methods have no particular end.

Works Cited

Bardi, Jason Socrates. The Calculus Wars: Newton, Leibniz, and the Greatest Mathematical Clash of All Time. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 2006.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm., and J. M. Child. The Early Mathematical Manuscripts of Leibniz. Mineola, NY: Dover Publ., 2005.

Newton, Isaac. The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. Vol. 7, 1718-1727. Edited by A. Rupert Hall and Laura Tilling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Royal Society, 1977.

Open Document