CNS Case Study

1236 Words3 Pages

As a result of a self-assessment and reflections on practice P. Ryan came up with improvements and recommendations of the CNS role. One important recommendation was to “ensure that the CNS role has supernumerary status. This would mean that the CNS would no longer be expected to work as a staff nurse on the unit.” (Ryan & Doody, 2014, p 29). This was one of the most important aspects that needed to be addressed first. Another article addressed a review of CNS productivity. “Reviews of CNS roles over the past few years have tended to focus on their qualitative contribution to holistic patient care (Norton et al, 2012), which has done little to define their quantitative financial contributions, such as through admission avoidance and reduced …show more content…

“A few gaps were identified between CNS core competencies and CNS role expectations in current practice.” (Baldwin, Clark, Fulton, & Mayo, 2009, p. 193). Core competencies from the NACNS are well founded from the view of practicing CNS’s as stipulated by Baldwin et al. These core competencies serve as the framework for CNS’s. “The competencies are specific enough to facilitate an understanding of the role by nursing leaders who are not CNSs yet who are responsible for evaluating CNS practice within an organization.” (Baldwin, Clark, Fulton, & Mayo, 2009, p. 200). Findings from evaluation of the CNS job are being used by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) as for a new core CNS test that is in …show more content…

It has been said that CNSs may be considered ‘invisible champions’ despite the many positive and significant contributions that they make to quality improvement.” (Walker, Urden, & Moody, 2009, p.515). Due to a CNS involvement in quality, evidence practice and safety issues are seen and addressed. Magnet status is a very complex process. There are 14 Forces of Magnetism which are the groundwork of obtaining Magnet status. The new model consist of an added 5 major components. These five components are as follows: “(1) transformational leadership; (2) structural empowerment; (3) exemplary nursing practice; (4) new knowledge, innovation, and improvements; and (5) empirical quality results.” (Walker, Urden, & Moody, 2009, p.515). As I view these new added components I see that the CNS role is an asset to applying and maintaining Magnet status. Which leads us into the question of how a CNS impacts the cost and quality of

Open Document