“But What Does It Really Mean?”: “Wolfland” and the Ambiguity of Meaning

529 Words2 Pages

In “Feminism and Fairy Tales,” Karen E Rowe states that “[t]traditional fairy tales fuse morality with romantic fantasy in order to portray cultural ideas of human relationships (209). These tales “glorify passivity…and self-sacrifice” while “gloss[ing] over the heroine’s impotence” (210; 211). Not only can the female protagonist do nothing but wait for rescue, she easily accepts this role and her helpless state. Tanith Lee’s “Wolfland” is a direct response to the traditional fairy tale. Anna and Lisel, the female protagonists, shatter the chains that oppress the typical fairy tale heroine. Similar to many fairy tale heroines, Anna traded her “independent selfhood for subordination” when she shackled herself with the unbreakable “chain” of marriage (Rowe 216; Lee 145). However, unlike most fairy tales, the marriage does lead to a happily-ever-after; it leads to a life of torment and abuse. This marriage, however, does not “effectively sabotage [Anna’s] female assertiveness” (Rowe 218). She is not content to endure a life of whips and peaches as she waits for rescue ...

More about “But What Does It Really Mean?”: “Wolfland” and the Ambiguity of Meaning

Open Document