More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study: approaches to ethical dilemmas
Ethical dilemma case analysis paper pilot
Ethical dilemma case study since 2015
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For my paper I chose the case of Avco Environmental. The case is fictitious and can be found on the businessethics.ca linked provided in prezi. The facts of the case are Chantale Leroux, a clerk for Avco Environmental Services, which is a toxic waste disposal company, has found evidence that Avco might be disposing medical waste in the local municipal landfill. I feel this case violates seven of the ten primary traps and eight of the ten prima facie duties. In reading the case, you can separate Chantale the person from Avco Environmental the company and see who has violated what traps.
In looking at the ten primary traps from the Hoyk and Hersey book , seven of the ten traps were cause for the ethical failure. The first trap is obedience to authority. In this case if Chantale chooses not to call her friend who works for the newspaper, for fear of repercussions at work, she is then listening to her supervisors’ directions and keeping quite about the situation. Chantale may hold indirect responsibility for what could happen if some of the medical waste was to threaten public safety say by polluting a local water source. Another trap that goes along with indirect responsibility would be faceless victims, in were the company does not see one specific person or group of persons being affected rather as the trap states a faceless person were no feelings of guilt or remorse are attached.
Competition, tyranny of goals and money are three more traps violated in this case. Competition has more to do with the company rather than Chantale the person. Chantale can empathize why her superiors’ want to ignore the situation, because they are a smaller company and in competing against larger companies, they would not be able to m...
... middle of paper ...
... long as the inspections/audits were completely random and only the very top management officers were privy to the reports than employees could feel as though they were constantly being watched and not participate in wrongdoing. A hot line that was sent to an outside source is also a good tool for monitoring any wrongdoing and gives the whistle blower a since of anonymity. The last tool that could help Avco prevent future problems is to have regular company outings were the employees could see where the waste was going and how it is being disposed of properly and that by doing the right thing they were saving the environment.
Works Cited
Whistle blowing & the Environment: The Case of Avco Environmental www.businessethics.ca/cases/wb-env1.html (March 29, 2010).
Robert Hoyk and Paul Hersey, The Ethical Executive (Stanford: Stanford Business Books, 2008)
The moral dilemma identified in the Lake Pleasant Bodies case is an attorney’s disturbing conflict with his competing rights to his client and as Badaracco (2009) states “…and his empathy for the victims’ families” (Badaracco, 2009, p. 6). In the case study, Attorney Frank Armani sympathizes with the father of a victim and questions divulging confidential information that would breech the attorney-client agreement with his client Frank Garrow. Additionally, the moral dilemma includes the overwhelming decisions Armani faced constructing a plausible defense for this client and at the same time setting aside his personal reservations regarding his clients guilt.
Apply one ethical principle to your assigned case. You may use the definitions (Week 1) or obtain information from an article or book. Give specific details as to why this principle applies to your
The company has a culture of unquestioning when something wrong surfaced in the company. Take for example the Lockheed documents incident, where the 25000 documents were seen in the company for nearly 3 years before someone voiced his concerns regarding it. This unhealthy culture not only allows unethical practices to prevail, it also hinders company’s growth.
These same standards must apply to all levels of the company for the company to thrive. Vicki Vice-President failed in all three areas, ethical reasoning, the application of morals and ethics to a situation, duty-based ethics, the idea that every person has certain duties to others, and outcome-based ethics, which focuses on the action itself and the impact the decision has to maximize benefits and minimize harm (Cross, Miller, 2015). First she was appointed into a key position within Ace, which came with certain obligations that needed upheld. The Board, which appointed her, specifically stated that all negotiations with Widget were to cease unless the Board approved such a venture. Second, Paul President invited key officials from Widget for a full day visit at Ace, which allowed them access to loan files and Ace procedures. Third, in an effort to avoid a dilemma, Vicki Vice President eluded Paul President’s invitation to be present during the day of the visit with senior officials at Widget by stating that her conscious would not allow her to participate, and therefore would work from home. The decision of the board to cease and desist their negotiations with Widget could come from corporate social responsibility in which Ace considered its decision on the impact it would have had on its customers, creditors, and the community in which it operates. Clearly speculation, but at least it has
The six steps of the model are as follows: Identify the ethical dilemma, collect information, state the options, apply ethical principles to those options, make the decision, and implement the decision (Beemsterboer, 2010). The first step is to identify the ethical dilemma, which Beemsterboer describes as the most critical step in the model. To identify the ethical dilemma, one must recognize that the problem is an ethical dilemma with no one clear answer, and expound upon what the ethical question is. The next step is to collect information about the situation and values involved “as a basis for an informed decision.” (Beemsterboer, 2010, para. 8). After defining the ethical dilemma and gathering information about it, one must then state as many options as possible which may resolve the problem (Beemsterboer, 2010). Due to that fact that more than one decision may remedy an ethical dilemma, it is important to discuss all available options to better understand all angles of the situation and how to deal with as many of them as possible. Once all alternatives have been stated, each must be weighed against ethical principles. Beemsterboer suggests in the discussion of each option a list of pros and cons be made to demonstrate how the option may protect of violate ethical principles and values (2010).?? After analyzing each alternative it is much easier
As per request of the first assignment of this course, I watched the movie “A Civil Action” starring John Travolta (Jan Schlichtmann), as a plaintiff’s lawyer and Robert Duvall (Jerome Facher) and Bruce Norris (William Cheeseman) as the defendant’s lawyers of W.R. Grace and J Riley Leather companies. The movie depicted the court case fought in the 1980’s among the previously mentioned companies and the residents of Woburn a little town located in Massachusetts. After watching the movie, an analysis using the ethical tools reflected in the chapter 1 of the course textbook will be used to portray the ethical issues of the movie.
Benson, G. C. S. (1982). Business Ethics in America. Lexington MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
Explain the connection between the economic model of corporate social responsibility and “free market” or “neoclassical” economic theory.
Nelson, K., & Trevino, L. (2004). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley
Ethical business practices include assuring that the highest legal and moral standards are observed in your relationships with the people in your business community. This includes the most important person in your business, your customer. Short term profit at the cost of losing a customer is long term death for your business.
How do you feel when you drive by some sort of factory or plant and you see an obnoxiously large smoke stack spewing fumes into the air or a drainage pipe of chemical runoff that flows into a water supply? The sense of disgust from the thought of how these companies get away with this action not only concur with opinion of environment activists but also involves the United States government. It was not long ago that the government realized that these effects were harmful to the world around us, which caused the government to create several groups to enforce laws and regulations against these unethical operating businesses. These questions are similar to those frequently asked by many economists when discussing the subject of business environmental laws and ethics. A business must decide how they want to run their business, unethically by cutting corners or abiding by ethical and law standards. This issue comes down to the standpoint wherever businesses may fall on if they care more about using unethical ways to gain some sort of advantage or if they would rather operate in a way with limits but complies with ethical and law standards. (MODIFY THESIS)
The notion of ethics deals with people’s behaviors within a company. Social responsibility involves a company’s moral obligations and the manner in which the organization makes its decisions. Although ethics and social responsibility are similar on a conceptual basis, each has its own unique characteristics that express their differences and its independence of the other. Ethics and social responsibility have to be present and coincide with one another for a business to be ethically sound.
“Unless humanity is suicidal, it should want to preserve, at the minimum, the natural life-support systems and processes required to sustain its own existence” (Daily p.365). I agree with scientist Gretchen Daily that drastic action is needed now to prevent environmental disaster. Immediate action and changes in attitude are not only necessary for survival but are also morally required. In this paper, I will approach the topic of environmental ethics from several related sides. I will discuss why the environment is a morally significant concern, how an environmental ethic can be developed, and what actions such an ethic would require to maintain and protect the environment.
Corporate social responsibility is a concept that companies own social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders. It is considered that the aim for CSR is to convert from philanthropic rationale to performance-driven task. It is also known as Corporate Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship, Responsible Business, Sustainable Responsible Business (SRB),Corporate Social Performance. It is also defined as Additional responsibilities of businesses to local and wider communities apart from its core responsibility of profit maximization(Simpson and Taylor, 2013).
Mondi also protects high conservation value ecosystems, including wetlands. Social Responsibility- Mondi engages with communities in and around their plantation forests and mills. Their social investments help drive development by focusing on health, education and local enterprise. Business ethics-