More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study: approaches to ethical dilemmas
Ethical dilemma case analysis paper pilot
Ethical dilemma case study since 2015
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For my paper I chose the case of Avco Environmental. The case is fictitious and can be found on the businessethics.ca linked provided in prezi. The facts of the case are Chantale Leroux, a clerk for Avco Environmental Services, which is a toxic waste disposal company, has found evidence that Avco might be disposing medical waste in the local municipal landfill. I feel this case violates seven of the ten primary traps and eight of the ten prima facie duties. In reading the case, you can separate Chantale the person from Avco Environmental the company and see who has violated what traps.
In looking at the ten primary traps from the Hoyk and Hersey book , seven of the ten traps were cause for the ethical failure. The first trap is obedience to authority. In this case if Chantale chooses not to call her friend who works for the newspaper, for fear of repercussions at work, she is then listening to her supervisors’ directions and keeping quite about the situation. Chantale may hold indirect responsibility for what could happen if some of the medical waste was to threaten public safety say by polluting a local water source. Another trap that goes along with indirect responsibility would be faceless victims, in were the company does not see one specific person or group of persons being affected rather as the trap states a faceless person were no feelings of guilt or remorse are attached.
Competition, tyranny of goals and money are three more traps violated in this case. Competition has more to do with the company rather than Chantale the person. Chantale can empathize why her superiors’ want to ignore the situation, because they are a smaller company and in competing against larger companies, they would not be able to m...
... middle of paper ...
... long as the inspections/audits were completely random and only the very top management officers were privy to the reports than employees could feel as though they were constantly being watched and not participate in wrongdoing. A hot line that was sent to an outside source is also a good tool for monitoring any wrongdoing and gives the whistle blower a since of anonymity. The last tool that could help Avco prevent future problems is to have regular company outings were the employees could see where the waste was going and how it is being disposed of properly and that by doing the right thing they were saving the environment.
Works Cited
Whistle blowing & the Environment: The Case of Avco Environmental www.businessethics.ca/cases/wb-env1.html (March 29, 2010).
Robert Hoyk and Paul Hersey, The Ethical Executive (Stanford: Stanford Business Books, 2008)
These ethical dilemmas were a big part of the story novel and caused most of the conflict that arose in the novel. One of the ethical dilemmas was David telling the nurse to bring his daughter to an Institution. By making that decision to send his daughter away based on his past experience with his sick sister and assumption about how the future will be. This connects to the ethical topic of techniques of neutralization by Joseph Heath. He uses an excuse to prove that his decision wasn’t unethical when it really was. According to the Denial of responsibility technique, he believed that he had no choice in sending Phoebe away, David saw it as the only option because he was so focus on his past experience. He imagined what Phoebe’s life would be like and the likely toll of caring for her would have on the family. Caused him to see Phoebe as a threat, with only one option to solve the
The moral dilemma identified in the Lake Pleasant Bodies case is an attorney’s disturbing conflict with his competing rights to his client and as Badaracco (2009) states “…and his empathy for the victims’ families” (Badaracco, 2009, p. 6). In the case study, Attorney Frank Armani sympathizes with the father of a victim and questions divulging confidential information that would breech the attorney-client agreement with his client Frank Garrow. Additionally, the moral dilemma includes the overwhelming decisions Armani faced constructing a plausible defense for this client and at the same time setting aside his personal reservations regarding his clients guilt.
Although Hollate introduced a compliance program and code of conduct when it went public, the programs were put on “the back burner”. This outcome is not surprised for that the company does not pay attention to the programs. It is, therefore, important to “reinforce the values” and “employee a boundary system when actions are inconsistent with the code of conduct” for the purpose of early detection. Tyco provides a good example after its scandal, by initiating “mandatory annual compliance training for all its employees worldwide” and creating the Tyco Guide to Ethical Conduct to familiarize employees with company expectations and help them make ethical decisions. As tips is the most useful method for internal and external sources to detect frauds, the whistleblower hotline should be well communicated with encouragement on reporting any suspicious activity. In addition, to improve the effectiveness of the compliance program and code of conducts, Hollate should implement management monitoring and evaluation on a regular
The company has a culture of unquestioning when something wrong surfaced in the company. Take for example the Lockheed documents incident, where the 25000 documents were seen in the company for nearly 3 years before someone voiced his concerns regarding it. This unhealthy culture not only allows unethical practices to prevail, it also hinders company’s growth.
Apply one ethical principle to your assigned case. You may use the definitions (Week 1) or obtain information from an article or book. Give specific details as to why this principle applies to your
As per request of the first assignment of this course, I watched the movie “A Civil Action” starring John Travolta (Jan Schlichtmann), as a plaintiff’s lawyer and Robert Duvall (Jerome Facher) and Bruce Norris (William Cheeseman) as the defendant’s lawyers of W.R. Grace and J Riley Leather companies. The movie depicted the court case fought in the 1980’s among the previously mentioned companies and the residents of Woburn a little town located in Massachusetts. After watching the movie, an analysis using the ethical tools reflected in the chapter 1 of the course textbook will be used to portray the ethical issues of the movie.
Registered Nurse John, Registered Nurse Jane and Director of Nursing Ms Day are all entitled to self – determination and to be motivated by their own actions. The actions of John, Jane and Ms Day are their own undertakings even though nurses are not considered autonomous decision makers (Butts, 2013). Nurses are still required by law to follow the instructions given to them by physician authority and to refute this needs a strong case for argument (Arnold & Boggs, 2013). RN John displays a sense of duty of care to protect the weak and vulnerable. An impression of doing the greater good is conveyed by John in his actions of stealing medical supplies. He believes he is not doing any harm to those around him as the supplies were meant for the disposal unit anyway and are meant for a good cause (McPherson, 2011). Rn Jane wants to prot...
Explain the connection between the economic model of corporate social responsibility and “free market” or “neoclassical” economic theory.
These same standards must apply to all levels of the company for the company to thrive. Vicki Vice-President failed in all three areas, ethical reasoning, the application of morals and ethics to a situation, duty-based ethics, the idea that every person has certain duties to others, and outcome-based ethics, which focuses on the action itself and the impact the decision has to maximize benefits and minimize harm (Cross, Miller, 2015). First she was appointed into a key position within Ace, which came with certain obligations that needed upheld. The Board, which appointed her, specifically stated that all negotiations with Widget were to cease unless the Board approved such a venture. Second, Paul President invited key officials from Widget for a full day visit at Ace, which allowed them access to loan files and Ace procedures. Third, in an effort to avoid a dilemma, Vicki Vice President eluded Paul President’s invitation to be present during the day of the visit with senior officials at Widget by stating that her conscious would not allow her to participate, and therefore would work from home. The decision of the board to cease and desist their negotiations with Widget could come from corporate social responsibility in which Ace considered its decision on the impact it would have had on its customers, creditors, and the community in which it operates. Clearly speculation, but at least it has
“Unless humanity is suicidal, it should want to preserve, at the minimum, the natural life-support systems and processes required to sustain its own existence” (Daily p.365). I agree with scientist Gretchen Daily that drastic action is needed now to prevent environmental disaster. Immediate action and changes in attitude are not only necessary for survival but are also morally required. In this paper, I will approach the topic of environmental ethics from several related sides. I will discuss why the environment is a morally significant concern, how an environmental ethic can be developed, and what actions such an ethic would require to maintain and protect the environment.
How do you feel when you drive by some sort of factory or plant and you see an obnoxiously large smoke stack spewing fumes into the air or a drainage pipe of chemical runoff that flows into a water supply? The sense of disgust from the thought of how these companies get away with this action not only concur with opinion of environment activists but also involves the United States government. It was not long ago that the government realized that these effects were harmful to the world around us, which caused the government to create several groups to enforce laws and regulations against these unethical operating businesses. These questions are similar to those frequently asked by many economists when discussing the subject of business environmental laws and ethics. A business must decide how they want to run their business, unethically by cutting corners or abiding by ethical and law standards. This issue comes down to the standpoint wherever businesses may fall on if they care more about using unethical ways to gain some sort of advantage or if they would rather operate in a way with limits but complies with ethical and law standards. (MODIFY THESIS)
The notion of ethics deals with people’s behaviors within a company. Social responsibility involves a company’s moral obligations and the manner in which the organization makes its decisions. Although ethics and social responsibility are similar on a conceptual basis, each has its own unique characteristics that express their differences and its independence of the other. Ethics and social responsibility have to be present and coincide with one another for a business to be ethically sound.
Ethical business practices include assuring that the highest legal and moral standards are observed in your relationships with the people in your business community. This includes the most important person in your business, your customer. Short term profit at the cost of losing a customer is long term death for your business.
Corporate social responsibility is a concept that companies own social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders. It is considered that the aim for CSR is to convert from philanthropic rationale to performance-driven task. It is also known as Corporate Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship, Responsible Business, Sustainable Responsible Business (SRB),Corporate Social Performance. It is also defined as Additional responsibilities of businesses to local and wider communities apart from its core responsibility of profit maximization(Simpson and Taylor, 2013).
Mondi also protects high conservation value ecosystems, including wetlands. Social Responsibility- Mondi engages with communities in and around their plantation forests and mills. Their social investments help drive development by focusing on health, education and local enterprise. Business ethics-