Caltex's Business in South Africa

1213 Words3 Pages

In my opinion Caltex’s plan was important to the South African. It allowed the black majority to be able to have top jobs in their companies and it also helped them to be able to be with and care for families and dependants. Blacks had no right to vote, they had to use separate areas in public, including dining places, bathrooms, transportation, and others. Caltex became a founder signatory of the Sullivan Principles in South Africa.

The majority of investment was done by foreign companies. One of the biggest companies was Caltex. There is a different standard of behavior for companies as large as Standard and Texaco. These companies are multi-national with billions of dollars in annual income. In my opinion multinational companies have a morals and ethnical responsibility.

They must show a good example to other companies. I believe that Caltex did that they produced the product and also recognize the rights of the manual workers. Being moral and ethically wrong is what happens in this situation. Because how the blacks were not allowed to be with their families they were forced to live in high racially segregated part of the county, They were prohibited from socializing with Whites.

It is obviously clear that as hard as they worked they were paid unfairly. The worse was not being able to associate with a coworker just because they were white. Apartheid laws won the supremacy of whites they defiantly had control over the country even though they are out number by blacks.

Some of the benefits were that Caltex employment policies include equal pay for the same work benefit plans and it will allow the advancement in the company regardless of race based on job performance that turned out to be a great...

... middle of paper ...

...y country on this plant be allowed to this serious type of slavery and expect no one to interfere. It can still be allowed to have investors who disagree with your treatment of human being, Yes it is very important for an organization to make money that’s primary the reason that they are there.

I don’t think so, yes we are obligated to an extent but we do have a right to say you have broken human rights laws so we shall break your laws. Should the management of a company look primarily to the law and to the rate of return on its investment as the ultimate criteria for deciding what investments it should make my answer is No!

The main responsibility for profit and return on investment is with the management owners and Board of Directors. It is untimely their decision to come to consensus for the future of their organization in South Africa.

Open Document