Buonarrotti Vs Da Vinci

538 Words2 Pages

Buonarrotti and Da Vinci. Two of the most amazing and historically famous artists of their time. Some would say that Da Vinci's works are timeless, wondrous, and mesmerizing. These same people would call the works of Buonarrotti, groundbreaking, mythical, and elegant. Da Vinci's most famous work being "Mona Lisa". and Buonarotti's being the statue of David. Both works unparalleled and powerful in their conveyance. What both of these artists do a great job of portraying is an idea of classical pieces. Pieces that will forever be treasured and and admired by anyone with the ability to physically see these artpieces. To give background, these two artists were essentially rivals. Both works being created at the same time seem to parallel competition. …show more content…

We also see da vinci is an inventor, engineer, and philosopher. He is very active outside of his artistic life and sketches the anatomy of man. In his works we do see a continuing pattern of paintings that he doesn't stray from. This is a clear difference in the works of that of Da Vinci vs that of Michelangelo. Michelangelo specializes in all aspects of art, visually, painting, sculpting, and architecture also takes on the task of the Pieta. Which is one of my favorite artworks of all time. The attention to detail is emotionally moving. As you can see in the massive sculpture there are folds in the dress of Mary as her son Jesus' body is draped in her arms so realistically. Her eyes closed but her face so disheartened. Their clothing and all objects portrayed in the sculpture itself are all so very realistic. The way Jesus' body is placed in the arms of his mother created an impression in the dress of Mary and Michelangelo portrays this so well. While Michelangelo was one of the best sculptures of his time, he was also a very talented painter. We see in his works of the Sistine chapel, the conversion of Saul, and

Open Document