Bruce Schneier's Argumentative Essay

531 Words2 Pages

When you see security guards, cameras, and full body scanners, your safety is not even close to assured in that building or location. Cryptographer and Privacy Specialist, Bruce
Schneier, describes this idea as what he calls “Security Theater”. Schneier uses explanation of logical and emotional ideas that factor into our perception of how safe we are. His use of these appeals help him convey his purpose to the audience and effectively show the audience the importance of what Schneier is saying.
In the beginning Schneier begins with the statement that security is a feeling and a reality and the two do not always A-line. He uses logical but simple statements to explain the idea of a security trade off, or that in order to gain security you must …show more content…

Schneier discussion of “trade-offs” and its existence in everyday decisions we make is a making a connection to the everyday lives of the audience drawing them in. And then saying that we are really bad at the trade-off is Schneier way to connect to the issue he is presenting. Using humor about “sacrificing virgins and unicorn defenses” was effective because it is a ridiculous notion, but a good parallel to the “security” around us. This was an effective way of telling theaudience that their perception is often wrong, while making it humorous so it doesn’t insult the people listening. This is one of the few statements of credibility used by Schneier. He does not establish his own credibility, but the importance and credibility of the topic at hand
Schneier doesn’t give the audience any of his personal back ground in this area and that could be seen as an undermining of what he said in his speech. However instead of using ethos as a way of say “this is why you should listen to me,” Schneier relied on the relevance of the topic as a way to say “this is how this is important to you.” This puts less focus of

Open Document