Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British effect on india
British effect on india
British effect on india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: British effect on india
British Rule in India at the End of the First World War
By the end of the First World War the British Rule in India was still
powerful, but would soon break down. However, thousands of Indians
fought in the war hoping that in return they would be given home rule.
It would have been difficult to win without the invaluable help of the
Indians and their constant supply of manpower. India was a vast
supplier of raw materials to Britain and would in return buy British
manufactured goods.
Two- thirds of India was governed by the British, whilst the remainder
was governed by Indian princes. The princely state rulers kept their
power by signing treaties with the British. Signing these treaties
would make the Indian princes loyal supporters to the British Raj.
British judges, army officers and police officers all were involved
when it came to controlling India. However, Indians served s police
officers, lawyers and as solider. But there were always British
officers and officials above them. The power was within the members of
the Indian Civil Service, who were responsible for administering
India, settling disputes and encouraging economic development.
India had been run by direct rule, (when the person running the
country is physically in the country they own), which was what the
Viceroy did, but still had to answer to the British Parliament and
indirect rule (when someone has to refer to someone else when it comes
to making decisions, laws and rules).
The Viceroy, who was appointed by the British government at
Westminster, was the king's representative. The Viceroy governed with
the help and assistance of the Imperial Legislative ...
... middle of paper ...
...ortunities to give them some sort of power,
and did fail in its attempts to reform India, but at the same time
didn't (as Indians were given hope and power). But they failed because
the Indians had one thing on their mind which was self government,
which would also show why they'd rejected many of the acts. Also by
how the situation would keep getting worse with the Indians becoming
more and more frustrated. Such as how the Indians were always thought
of as second best by the quotes from the Sources "If riding a pony, an
Indian was expected to dismount and lead the pony" not only is that
humiliating for having to do that in your own country but is
undeserved. The Indians could not get very high jobs in the hierarchy,
and if were given the chance would not be given very secure positions,
and only few would be given out.
British Imperialism in India and China Imperialism is the domination of a weaker country by a stronger country. For instance, Britain dominated India and China in the mid 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century. Imperialism has had both a positive and negative effect on the countries involved. Britain was imperialistic for many reasons, it could dominate because it had the technology and power to do so.
Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement in India to regain their freedom. He believed that there should not be a Caste System because of one’s birth.
The Mughals had control of India but in 1707 slowly lost it. The East India Company saw the Mughals collapse and attacked in 1757. The East India Company had officially taken complete control of India until the 19th century. The British did create an official government, built tons of railroad tracks, and educated many Indians. They also governed in their own defense, exported India's natural resources to themselves, and only 16 % of the population got educated.
Thesis Statement: I believe that a profound effect on Indian religion practiced in the New World was caused by Columbus and the Age of Discovery. Historical evidence proves that, before there were Europeans on this continent, there were native peoples living in communion with their environment and, very often, each other. Their religious practices were interwoven with their daily lives and religion held a prominent, significant place within their culture. The intrusion by Europeans into this peaceful world had profound effects on the Indians, especially their religious practices. What had been a peaceful, harmonic lifestyle changed dramatically that fall of 1492.
Two important sources that will be used during this investigation are Indian Summer by Alex Von Tunzelmann and Empire: How Britain Made The Modern World by Niall Ferguson. Summary of Evidence After the Battle of Plussey in 1757, Britain gained much control over India. The British East India Company exercised power in this region instead of the Queen of England. The Company brought British soldiers and missionaries to the foreign land. The military in India was comprised of European troops and Indian troops, resulting in a variety of weapons present.
For centuries, India was a country of separate dynasties and kingdoms, which often led to a wide variety of cultural and ethnic tensions and continuous change of power for many of the kingdoms. They viewed each other as enemies, which created an opportunity for countries, such as England, to invade and eventually rule much of the country. Britain colonized the Indian subcontinent (present-day countries of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) from 1757 until 1947 (Iyer 2). Not all areas were directly under British control, in other cases Indian rulers governed them, and power was split between the two (Iyer 2). For the British, India was strategically placed in terms of geography, manpower, natural resources, and land, as well as many other sectors (Maddison 1).
Imperialism in India British imperialism in India had many positive and negative effects on both the mother country, Britain and the colony, India. Many people would argue which effects were more prominent in these countries, and some would agree that they were equal. But in both cases, there were actually both. In India, the British colonization had more positive effects than negative. For instance, when the British colonized India they built 40,000 miles of railroad and 70,000 miles of paved roadway.
There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. India, having previously been an group of independent and semi-independent princedoms and territories, underwent great change under British administration. Originally intended to consolidate their hold on India by establishing a population that spoke the same language as their rulers, the British decision in the 1830s to educate Indians in a Western fashion, with English as the language of instruction, was the beginning of a chain of events, including a rise in Indian nationalism, that led to Indian resentment of British imperialism and ultimately to the loss of British control over India.
Introduction Malaysia was once a colonized land and known as Malaya back then. Malaysia is one of the Commonwealth countries, which means Malaysia is one of the British colonies. Malaysia was under British powers for approximately 446 years (from 1511 until 1957). The Portuguese, Dutch, British, Japanese & even Siamese had colonized Malaya before. 1.
The decision to grant independence to India was not the logical culmination of errors in policy, neither was it as a consequence of a mass revolution forcing the British out of India, but rather, the decision was undertaken voluntarily. Patrick French argues that: “The British left India because they lost control over crucial areas of the administration, and lacked the will and the financial or military ability to recover that control”.
“The strongest physical force bends before moral force when used in the defense of truth.” - Mahatma Gandhi (Bondurant). Mahatma Gandhi was the main leader in helping India become independent through the principles of non violence, self-rule, and the unity of Hindus and Muslims. His full name was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, but he was given the name Mahatma later on in his life. He wanted to see an united India without the rule of the British Empire. He accomplished this with passive resistance or resistance by non violence because he wanted to show that violence is not always the best answer.
The British invasion formed into a historical development of British colonialism in India. Despite India under the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi played an important role in gaining Independence. He not only changed India but also strongly fought for India's independence, using various strategies. The British Empire ruled as long as they could to reform India both politically and socially.
Imperial Britain was the most powerful empire of its time. The British would capture any country that they felt had resources to offer. There is no argument that the British made their impact on the way India is today. India, before Britain, was a country filled with groups of independent princedoms but this all changed under British rule. The British introduced English to the Indians and later on started educating the Indians in a Western Fashion. In addition to the language they brought to India, they also brought industrial advances with them. Even though the British took harsh measure to gain rule of India, India would not be as developed as it is now without the British and would not be one of the world 's largest industrial countries
Ruby Kaur May 10, 2014 Source 1 Ricardo Pollack is distinguished as a director because of the documentary, Partition: The Day India Burned (2007). The documentary itself discusses the detrimental consequences of the withdrawal of Britain's reign from India in 1947, which led to the forced relocation of men, women, and even children across newly defined border lines, along with violence, rape, and murder. The film makes its argument through dramatized reconstructions and witness testimonies, which offer personal insight into the horrors of the partition and conjure up feelings of sympathy and remorse. The film intends to make an educated public more aware of how an ethnically diverse nation was tragically divided and its effects on civilian lives. This is a secondary source with primary sources because it is based on witness testimonies and an actual historical event, but offers its own evaluation on the issue through dramatized reconstructions of the event.