Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bowen's theory of family systems
Bowen's theory of family systems
Families shape human behaviour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bowen's theory of family systems
The purpose of this paper is to explain using Bowen's family systems framework, how
an individual's level of differentiation and anxiety influence family relationships and
strengths. Bowen's family systems theory addresses how patterns of interaction in the
family of origin influence a couple's interaction in the next generation with their
children. Bowen describes the differences in family functioning, by the degree of anxiety
or the degree of differentiation within the family. Bowen's definition of differentiation
of self as a persons ability to differentiate intellectual functioning ( thinking ), from
feelings. The level of differentiation of self is determined in the family of origin. When
an individual has an increased level of differentiation, he has a clear sense of his own
identity. A person's intellectual functioning helps behavior to be rational, less
impulsive, more independent and autonomous. These individuals have good problem
solving techniques, and are less influenced by others. As differentiation of self increases,
levels of anxiety decrease. As anxiety goes up, differentiation goes down. A child's
differentiation of self develops around an emotional system. With a high level of
anxiety, functioning is impulsive, rather than rational. Individuals with a low level of
differentiation, develop dependent and emotionally fused relationships. These
individuals are more dependent on others. Their sense of self is clouded, and they don't
develop a clear identity. Their feelings and thoughts are fused, and they express a
pseudoself rather than their true opinions.
Families whose members have increased levels of differentiation and decreased
levels of anxiety, they will be rational and cognitive in their ways of relating to other
family members, and more effective with problem solving skills. They will try to clearly
communicate their views or beliefs. They will have healthier relationships. An
individual with an increased level of differentiated self , will allow their child to be their
own person, and express himself openly. This leads to a well adjusted independent
adolescent, with flexible problem solving skills, and an increased level of goal
orientation.
Families with decreased levels of differentiation and increased anxiety with in the
(1) Differentiation of self is when the individual can separate their identity from that of their family’s without completely cutting them off. Understanding the need for individualization is a cornerstone for comprehending the rest of Bowen’s processes. If one cannot differentiate them self from the family they are said to be fused. As a result they live with the family’s chronic anxiety. The less one is differentiated the more susceptible they are at being draw into family (2) triangles. These occur when two members draw in another member to stabilize their anxiety and to release emotional tension. Resolving family of origin anxiety happens through establishing differentiation. The less anxiety the less likely one will be caught in a maladaptive (3) nuclear family emotional system, which is the degree of differentiation one has with their parental subsystem. We also understand that individuals are likely to choose a spouse based on congruent levels of differentiation. Here we understand how chronic anxiety is passed through generations, labeled the (4) multigenerational transmission
Biological influences combined with societal and social expectations contribute to how well people learn to adapt to their environments (2013). According to Erikson, there are eight stages of development. Within these states, there are different psychological, emotional and cognitive tasks. In order to adjust, individuals must learn to develop these tasks. During adolescence, Erikson states that each person needs to navigate through the development task of ‘‘Identity vs. Identity confusion ’’ (2013). He defined this task by stating that adolescent children must learn to develop a sense of self and establish independence. Prior to this stage of development, a person’s parents largely influence their identity. In this stage the adolescent children begin to explore and develop their identity outside of their parents’ influence (Hill, Bromell, Tyson, & Flint, 2007). Adolescents are generally more egocentric at this stage and have an increased sense of self-consciousness. They also have a strong desire to conform to peer influence and develop concerns regarding their appearance. They develop concern about their level of competence in relation to their peer group as well. As peer influence increases, during this stage, parental influence decreases (Ashford & LeCroy, 2013; Hill et. al, 2007). Conflict generally increases between parent and child at this stage of development (2007).
According to Murray Bowen’s family systems theory, the family subsists in a system where as the individuals are inseparable from their network of relationships, but continue to strive to be individualized. Consequently, various forms of these networks are grounded in the domestic structure and the “normal” or “ideal” family and development derives from the interaction of the family members when they remain differentiated, unease is minimal, and partners have beneficial emotional communication with their own family members (Nichols, 2014). The concept of achieving individuality while remaining in a cohesive family unit may cause stress. Concepts such as differentiation of self, triangulation, emotional cutoff, and anxious attachment may aid in the elucidation of the family system. This theoretical concept along with these coinciding terms will be explored through one episode of the television series The Goldbergs called Rush.
a child develops he or she will begin to realise that the needs of the
The enduring differences between individuals are an intriguing subject area in modern psychology. An interest in examining how people differ in their thinking, feeling and behaviour has developed over time. Even over 2000 years ago, Plato stated “No two persons are born exactly alike; but each differs from the other in natural endowments, one being suited for one occupation and the other for another”.
Psychosocial development throughout the Life Cycle theory (sometimes known as individual development theory) proposes that each individual has the ability to master their environment at all stages of life (Coady & Lehman, 2008; Hutchison, 2008). The theory had its beginnings in Freud’s psychosexual stages of child development; however Erikson is responsible for laying the groundwork for the theory as it is known today, by proposing an epigenetic model of human development (Hutchison, 2008).
Many philosophers and psychologist from Jean Piaget to William James have theorized what makes a person who they are, their identity. Jean Piaget believed that the identity is formed in the sensorimotor stage and the preoperational stage. This means that a child is forming his identity as late to the age of seven (Schellenberg, 29) However, identity is strongly impacted by society such as school, church, government,and other institutions. Through our interactions with different situations our personality develops (Schellenberg 34). "In most situations there is a more diversified opportunity for the development of social identities, reflecting what the individual wants to put forth to define the self as well as what others want to accept,"(Schellenberg 35). Therefore, humans, much like animals, adapt to different situations based on who they are with. Individuals are always changi...
In this crisis, the boy would have to balance between developing a unique and individual identity while still being in a position to fit in, accepted or have a sense of belonging to a certain group. However, it is important for the individual to determine who they want to be in their life and the manner in which others would perceive them. According to Erikson, if an individual manages to navigate through this stage successfully they would emerge with the best understanding of their identity from a personal perspective in which they will also share with others. Therefore, the individual would be referred to have a life that is well adjusted or healthy. At the same time, the individual would be in a better position to associate freely with others, as they would not lose their own
Autonomy vs. shame and doubt is Erikson's second stage of development occurs between the first and third years in life. During this stage children learn to be independent by mastering tasks such as feeding a dressing themselves. If children do not develop autonomy during this stage they will doubt their ability and develop a sense of shame. I lived in one foster home from the time I was one and a half to the time my parents adopted me at age three. I believe that I developed during this stage just as well if not better than children who are biological or who are adopte...
This approach says humans have central characteristics at our core that make us human (i.e. compassion, language), which is passed to our offspring from generation to generation (1). This view likens humans to avocados in the extent that we have a fleshy exterior, with what makes us essentially human is at our center, and is passed to our children.
When looking at family systems, you must begin by looking at Murray Bowen’s family systems theory and “his views on the eight interlocking forces that shape family function,” (Haefner, 2014). Within Bowen’s family psychotherapy research, he noted that “family patterns and problems often repeat over generations, he also noted that families make up their own emotional systems, and within these systems they try to maintain stability and reduce conflict,” (Haefner, 2014). The eight interlocking forces noted by Bowen through (Haefner, 2014)
The necessary changes must take place in the self as well as in the larger system. Meanwhile, Bowen described the differentiation of self as the ability of a person to separate physically and emotionally from their family of origin, as well as achieving emotional maturity and independence without losing the ability to connect emotionally with others (Charles, 2011).
Out of the eight stages, the first four play a key role in developing ego identity (Gordon & Browne, 2014). Stage one is trust versus mistrust which occurs between birth and a year (Gordon & Browne, 2014). Erikson describes two levels of trust; the first is that significant adults will be present to meet their needs and the second is that they will believe in their ability to make changes and cope (Gordon & Browne, 2014). The characteristic for stage one is hope (Gordon & Browne, 2014). Stage two is autonomy versus doubt which occurs between 2 years of age to 3 (Gordon & Browne, 2014). In this stage the child learns to manage and control impulses and use motor and mental skills (Gordon & Browne, 2014). Willpower is the characteristic that best goes with stage two (Gordon & Browne, 2014). Stage three is initiative versus guilt which occurs between ages 3 to 5 or 6 years (Gordon & Browne, 2014). During this stage the child develops a sense of purpose and adult interaction is necessary for a positive outcome during this stage of life (Gordon & Browne, 2014). Purpose is best used to describe this stage in Erikson’s theory of development (Gordon & Browne,
Self as a human identity is driven by critical ideas in a way that humans tend to make rational decisions using logic which lead to different consequences, and these decisions are all based on personal characteristics and experiences. The reason why I stated self is a rational identity is because decisions do not just appear overnight. In fact, critical ideas and thoughts are cultivation developments controlled and influenced by human brains:the center of people’s mind palaces. Therefore, the main difference between other mammals and human beings is that human is able to think critically, behaves within ethical schema, and forms our own personal identities. Flesh may be rottened with the pass of time but ideas, are immortal, indestructible, and it cannot be killed. However, my view on development in personal characteristic is different. One person’s criticism can be influenced during childhood and formed later in his/her life, but characteristic is given by nature. For example, some infants are born quite, others, however, can be outgoing and behave differently; these specific differences in personalities are chosen randomly by nature. Unlike critical mindsets, ethical criterias, and ideas, characteristics are rooted in our body by birth. Furthermore, genes, environment, biology, none of these elements above are capable of forming/choosing a person’s personality before he/she is born. Now, the way that I chose to distinguish a good self from a bad self is based on how logical and rational one can be, whether he/she holds on valuable ideas/thoughts or not. More importantly, I evaluate oneself based on moral standard and ethical criteria. “One is good/right if one protects and/or promotes [humans’] moral obligations to one another...” (Pitmentel 113). All self have the duty to protect or promote human rights, utility, justice, virtue, and
and individuals can also play a role in a child’s development. Emotionally and socially, it is