Books Should Not Be Banned From Schools Essay

550 Words2 Pages

To Kill a Mockingbird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and The Grapes of Wrath are just a few examples of books that express racial injustice and the use of profanity or drugs. All of these things are a realitys of life and properly represent ideas and things that have happened in the past. The world is full of sin, and no matter how hard one tries sin is a fact of the past, present, and future. Such books, represent they way of living at different times and in different cultures. I believe books should not be banned from schools because they educate students on history, exposes them to different cultures, and does not shelter them from the sins of the world.

Such books should not be banned from public schools, because they expose the reader to things of the past. In Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Robinson was a honest, innocent, African American accused of raping a young woman. Sadly, the jury ruled Tom Robinson guilty and this later resulted in his death. Harper Lee’s booked used profanity and exposed racial profiling and injustice. Some may believe that the racist past of America …show more content…

Books that properly display historical facts such as the racism in To Kill a Mockingbird should remain in books, to educate students about historical facts written about in literature. Next, books that display things such as profanity, racism, and hypocrisy should still sit on public school’s bookshelf, because the public school should not shelter their students and I believe they need to educate their students on the rights and wrongs of the past and present. Finally, The Grapes of Wrath and books like it prove positive, because they expose students to different cultures and lifestyles. Public schools need to fully educate their students with facts of the past, present, and

Open Document