Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of imperialism in Nigeria
Effects of imperialism in Nigeria
Boko haram in nigeria,causes and solution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of imperialism in Nigeria
The Boko Haram insurgency is an ongoing conflict, stemming from north-eastern Nigeria, that involves the governments of Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, and Niger trying to suppress the rebel jihadist terrorist group Boko Haram. This conflict, in the liberalist perspective, is based on the failed bargaining of territory between one weak actor—Boko Haram—and multiple stronger, more developed actors—the Nigerian and other regional governments. Alternative political viewpoints see the war as Boko Haram’s backlash against Western influence in the region (Realism) or Nigeria’s social construction of terrorism as an act of war (Constructivism). Boko Haram first formed in 2002 under the name Jama 'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda 'awati wal-Jihad and set its headquarters …show more content…
Boko Haram’s aggression can be seen as backlash against the lasting effects of Western influence in Nigeria, brought about by European Imperialism in the early 20th century. Realists would claim that Boko Haram jihadists ambitiously aim to expand their caliphate throughout the region, eradicating all that do not support their cause. However, Realists do not account for Boko Haram’s recent incentive to negotiate with the Nigerian government, nor does it explain neighboring countries’ willingness to cooperate, especially when letting Boko Haram weaken Nigeria would be the easiest way to gain control of the region.
Constructivists pose a different understanding: They claim that Nigeria and its cooperatives perceive Boko Haram’s aggression as an “act of war,” and this perception has become an ideological norm that makes these countries obligated to fight back. They also attribute Boko Haram’s development to the upbringing of its supporters, all of which consider their operations as part of a religious mission. This theory is problematic, however, because it over-generalizes the mindset of both sides and does not consider ulterior political and financial incentives, as well as recent negotiation
The terrorist threat posed to United States (U.S.) interests within the Horn of Africa (HOA) is represented by one terrorist organization in particular, al-Shabaab. Areas of concern towards key strategic interests for the U.S. consist of armed conflicts, violent extremism, global trade, and maritime security in which al-Shabaab possess an influential capacity to disrupt, which effects political, economic, and social stability throughout region. As countries within the HOA continue to gain strategic importance to U.S. interest and policy makers, al-Shabaab and the various entities they collaborate with affect the stability of the region and remain a prevalent threat.
Political violence is action taken to achieve political goals that may include armed revolution, civil strife, terrorism, war or other such activities that could result in injury, loss of property or loss of life. Political violence often occurs as a result of groups or individuals believing that the current political systems or anti-democratic leadership, often being dictatorial in nature, will not respond to their political ambitions or demands, nor accept their political objectives or recognize their grievances. Formally organized groups, Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), businesses and collectives of individual citizens are non-state actors, that being that they are not locally, nationally or internationally recognized legitimate civilian or military authorities. The Cotonou Agreement of 2000 defines non-state actors as being those parties belonging to the private sector, economic and social partners and civil society in all its forms according to national characteristics. Historical observation shows that nation states with political institutions that are not capable of, or that are resistant to recognizing and addressing societies issues and grievances are more likely to see political violence manifest as a result of disparity amongst the population. This essay will examine why non-state political violence occurs including root and trigger causes by looking at the motivations that inspire groups and individuals to resort to non-conforming behaviors that manifest as occurrences of non-state political violence. Using terrorism and Islamic militancy on the one side, and human rights and basic freedoms on the other as examples, it will look at these two primary kinds of political violence that are most prevalent in the world ...
Some might describe the new Cold War that dominates foreign affairs today as westernization and globalization versus Islamic fundamentalism. Recently, Boko Haram, a Nigerian selafist extremist group, abducted two hundred seventy-six girls from their boarding school and threatened to sell them as child brides. The kidnapping sparked a global outcry against the group and called for the return of the girls. Unfortunately the abduction is not an isolated event, for Boko Haram has been terrorizing much of Northern Nigeria for the past few years. The anti-westernization that fuels Boko Haram is not a product of the new Cold War and religious fervor, but in fact an anti-westernization sentiment that stems from the roots of colonial Nigeria.
Terrorist organizations in Somalia, located within the Horn of Africa, present a current threat to the region and to United States (U.S.) interests. This paper will address the implication of a terrorist network within Somalia by analyzing the actions and motivations of Al-Shabab, the Somali Government, and the United States. Al-Shabab is gathering support by using religion, undermining the Somali Government, and by providing jobs and opportunities for the people of Somalia. If Al-Shabab continues growing in power it could lead to more extreme terrorists attacks in Somalia and the region.
“Thus, what motivates men to slay the enemy is anger,” Sun Tzu says in The Art of War. The conflict between Algerian Islamic fundamentalists and the Algerian military backed government is rooted in anger. The conflict, which began as skirmishes between government forces and Islamic fundamentalists, has taken on the proportions of a civil war as fundamentalists carried out kidnappings, assassinations and other forms of civil disturbance. The government has tried pacifying the Muslims by including Islamic leaders in the government, but extreme violence committed by both parties in the conflict has made a peaceful solution difficult to achieve. This violence has claimed the lives of an estimated 100,000 people in the years between 1990 and 2002.
Boko Haram, an Islamist militant group, has led to destruction throughout the country of Nigeria. According to the following BBC.com article, “Who are Nigeria’s Boko Haram Islamists?,” This Islamist group has induced “havoc in Africa’s most populous country through a wave of bombings, assassinations and abductions” (Chothia). Moreover, “The militant group has bombed schools, churches and mosques; kidnapped women and children; and assassinated politicians and religious leaders alike” (Karimi and Carter, “Boko Haram: A Bloody Insurgency, a Growing Challenge”). The purpose of Boko Haram is to overthrow Nigeria’s Government and create a pure Islamic state. Nigeria is at risk, possibly other countries in the future, if Boko Haram remains strong
Mingst, Karen A., and Jack L. Snyder. Andrew H. Kydd and Barbara F. Walter, The Strategies of Terrorism. Essential Readings in World Politics. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Print.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, the persecution of Christians has taken place in northern Nigeria. In the poverty-stricken nation, tension between Muslims and Christians runs high. The discrimination against Christians in the North along with violent attacks at the hands of the infamous Boko Haram violates several international laws and has led to the interference of the International Criminal Court and United States. Although the violence began in recent years, the conflict has been rising for centuries.
Extremism manifests itself dangerously in the Islam religion (Palmer, Monte, and Princess Palmer, 37). The Muslim religion has some laws and believes that no one should question their design, origin or application. Good people should punish immoral people in Islam religion without showing mercy to them. In Islam, human beings have no right to offer forgiveness to others that can easily lead to and create peace to oneself in the society. The unforgiving nature makes human rights groups in many ways try to change and support governments that try to overthrow Muslim extremist governments. Such an approach creates a war never ending between the Muslim governments and other governments that fight the extremist ideals. In East Africa, Somalia presents a case example by observing how the Government is not able to control the ever fighting and dreadful Al-Shabaab. The “Al-Shabaab” is an Arab name for Muslim youth who over the years try to use enforce extremist rulers in governing the country and hence controlling the resources. Muslim fighters and rebels arm themselves with arsenals they use to fight groups that oppose them by killing and torturing them. The al-Shabaab launches attacks that kill people and openly claim responsibility for the losses and the deaths they cause. They also punish members who commit sin using the retrogressive laws of the Quran on the people they label sinners. Other extremist
For example, many nations in Africa have been affected by a feeling of self-determination. Many African countries have regressed since gaining independence from their owner countries because of being riddled with poverty, wars, and leaders who took advantage of their own citizens for their own personal gains. The author’s opinion on self-determination can be disagreed by many because of the countless acts of terror by extremists who will go to any length to get their own nation. In the end, self-determination can be known to create a sense of resentment between
To adapt one of Isichei's claims, Nigeria's “confrontation with an alien culture, its conquest, and the experience of an alien rule, created … [crises]” (180). There were many riots and conflicts between the Nigerians and the British, although most of the uprisings were eventually subdued by the military power of the British. Riots were common—from the culturally rooted Yoruba riots in the West and the religious skirmishes with the Muslims and Hausa in the North, to the confrontations with the naturally ‘rich,' yet stubborn Igbo and Delta states. Apart from encompassing all the major ethnic groupings and regions in Nigeria, amazingly these conflicts also covered the three most explicit British inculcations: cultural, religious, and economic.
In Arabic, al Shabaab translates to "the youth." Reportedly, the members are characteristic as being young men in their early twenties. In addition, they are lacking adequate education and may have a criminal background. Recruitment in poor rural areas creates ample opportunties for them to enlist more support. It has been documented that al shabaab terrorist group are equipped with several thousand members along with a few hundred foreigners. (Zalman, Amy) Al Shabaab objective has been to spread Islamic rule in Somalia and to exterminate foreign influence. For the most part, they have conquered methods that are similar to Islamic militants in Afghanistan and Iraq which includes suicide bombings, small-arms attacks, road-side bombings an...
This group was created in 1978 and continues to expand its power today. It began as a branch of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood. This terrorist group has several goals ranging from creating a Islamic state to continuing the armed struggle against Israeli occupation of Palestine territories. Their acts of terrorism to date have included suicide bomb attacks against Israeli civilians to attacks on suspected Palestinian collaborators.
Yang, C.. (2010). Less Blood for Oil: Nigeria's Fragile Amnesty. Harvard International Review, 31(4), 6-7. Retrieved September 22, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1988429401).
The ultimate result was troops and as many as 3 million civilians died. While the outside world considered Nigeria to be a united and monolithic entity, even the British colonial administration was wary of the reality of Nigerian politics; the nation was not so much a “country” as it was more than three hundred different groups coalesced into one. 45 These tribes were divided between three main spheres of influence: the Yoruba, the Igbo, and the Hausa. Historically, their interests were often opposed, and their cultures did not come into regular contact with one another until the British occupation.