Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research paper of police officers and body cameras
Body cameras for law enforcement essay
Impact of police officers wearing body cameras essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research paper of police officers and body cameras
Body Cameras are an important aspect of policing today, we need to implement them. Body Cameras haven’t been around that long, but are making a big impact on policing. In the United Kingdom in 2005, they began testing a body camera for police officers. In 2010, over 40 areas in the United Kingdom were using body cameras. In the United States, on August 9th, 2014 in Ferguson, Missouri, Michael Brown was shot by a police officer. On July 17th, 2014 in New York, Eric Garner died while in police custody. Since these incidents, police body cameras have been a national topic. Technology is taking the world by storm, everyday there is a new, and unique gadget. Cameras are everywhere in this world. You are being recorded every day, by a camera you …show more content…
Every situation was different and had different facts and evidence that led up to what happened. With a lot of these incidents, the altercation was not in the viewing area of the car, and there was no video evidence to go off of. All they had might have been a blurry video from a cellphone that caught the end of the encounter and not the whole situation from start to finish. That’s why police worn body cameras are a must in Law Enforcement to have clear video evidence and see exactly what the officer is seeing during their encounter from start to …show more content…
Using the videos as a training tool is a great aspect for Law Enforcement to have. Police officers can learn a lot from watching a video. The training can be used for what to do, what not to do, and how to improve on things. It will help with training the officers be more skilled and knowledgeable. You learn best from seeing what you did or others did wrong and then understanding the situation and be able to see how to handle it differently. When you have visual aids it makes it easier to understand, instead of someone explaining it to them.
You will have improved behavior from the officer and from whoever is involved in a situation and should see a drop in accusations made regarding officer misconduct. The University of South Florida did research on body cameras for a year with the Orlando Police Department. They had some officers wear body cameras and some to not wear them. The close to yearlong program was from March 2014 through February 2015, use-of-force incidents were down fifty-three percent with the officers who were wearing body cameras and civilian complaints against those officers had a sixty-five percent
Due to devastating events that have occurred between policemen and civilians; law enforcements find it liable for police officers to be suited with body cameras. In doing so it is thought to bring an increase in trust in the community, reduce brutality and crime, as well as elucidate good cops still around.
Have you ever heard of the idea of body-mounted cameras on police officers? If not, David Brooks will introduce you to the idea that was discussed in an article from New York Times called “The Lost Language of Privacy”. In this article, the author addressed both the positive and negative aspects of this topic but mostly concerned with privacy invasion for Americans. Although that is a valid concern but on a larger scale, he neglected to focus greatly on the significant benefits that we all desire.
One of the sources used to disprove that body camera isn’t the answer includes Jamelle Bouie article, Keeping the Police honest. Mr. Bouie is the chief political correspondent at Slate who graduated from the University of Virginia with a political and social thought degree (Tumblr.com). His work consists of issues relating to national politics, public policies and racial inequality. His work has also been published in Slate online magazine, the New Yorker, the Washington Post and TIME Magazine (Tumblr.com). Slate is an online magazine that post about the news, politics, business, technology and culture (slate.com). In Jamelle article, Keeping the Police honest he talks about incidents where police officers were being recorded and took excessive
“A body-worn camera in public policing is a miniature audio and video recording device which allows recording of officers’ duties and citizen interaction,” notes Thomas K. Bud. Police body-cameras are significantly growing in popularity across Canada. While legislation has not confirmed definite rules regarding the use of body-cameras, local police departments have begun their implementation. Canadian police services involved in these projects include Toronto, Victoria, Edmonton, Calgary, and Amherstburg Police Services. The results of these projects have revealed mixed thoughts regarding body-camera effectiveness. Is it a good idea for police to wear body-cameras? While the cost of police wearing body cameras seems prohibitive, police wearing
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
The researcher hypothesizes that the use of body-cameras on police officers would reduce the instances of gainful communication between civilians and law enforcement. The null-hypothesis is that the use of body-cameras on police officers will have no effect on gainful communication between civilian and law enforcement. In determining the implications of how body-cameras effects civilian behavior, the research will include a sampling survey of criminal justice students and information gathered from journal documents related to research on police body-cameras.
Policeone.com reports that there is a “spillover effect” in departments where only some officers wear cameras as “citizen complaints declined both when cameras were in use and when they weren’t” and that it “may reflect a conscious effort by officers without cameras during a given shift to competitively improve their behavior to favorably match that of fellow officers who had the ‘advantage’ of wearing a body cam.” Logically, if the spillover effect is true, it would not be necessary for every officer in the department to have a body camera for a clear benefit to be visible. Those who believe that even minor use of body worn cameras (BWCs) as such is an unconstitutional violation of rights have been proven wrong time and time again through many levels of case law like People v. Lucero, 190 Cal. App. 3d 1065 where the case effectively explains that “a person has no expectation of privacy when they are engaged in an interaction with police.” (Ramirez, pg. 5) While some may also make the argument that “user licenses, storage
Police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it will build a trust between law enforcement and the community, it will decrease the amount of complaints against police officers, and lastly it will decrease the amount of police abuse of authority. In addition, an officer is also more likely to behave in a more appropriate manner that follows standard operating procedures when encountering a civilian. “A 2013 report by the Department of Justice found that officers and civilians acted in a more positive manner when they were aware that a camera was present” (Griggs, Brandon). Critics claim that the use of body cameras is invasive of the officers and civilians privacy.
Do police officers really need body cameras is a question that has been repeated all throughout the nation. Body cameras are video recording systems that are used by law enforcement to record their interactions with the public and gather video evidence. Most police departments do not wear body cameras currently and the ones that do are in trial phases to see how it works out. There are many advantages to police officers wearing body cameras but in asking the question should they wear body cameras the stakeholders should look at the complete picture. One reason that police and body cameras have constantly been brought up lately are the instances of police brutality happening within the United States. Police brutality within the United States
It’s late in the afternoon. You are walking down the street and witness a police officer attack a young African-American male who obeyed every command that the police officer was imposing. The male was told to put his hands behind his head and to freeze, so he did. Suddenly you hear gunshots and see the male on the floor bleeding to death and yet several police men run and continue to attack him. They beat him up and yell in his face. What would you do? Would you take your cell phone out and record everything that is happening or would you go and try to stop them knowing you are putting yourself in danger? Throughout the years, police brutality has been a major issue in the United States because the laws are not enforced. Police believe they have the power and the right to do anything they want whenever they want however they want therefore, people have argued that a possible solution to this is problem is body cams. Due to the high statistics of police brutality, body cams cannot
When police officers wear body cameras it helps with report there're filing , with the body cameras it provides more evidence to the table. According to Los Angles Times they state that " When officers watch the video it will alter the officers' memory of the incident". I know what your thinking, you maybe wondering how is that a good thing well let me tell you. The human memory is highly charged events and not all the time police officers are going to remember EVERY single
Police officers with their body cameras: a history and back ground paper to answer the question if should all police officers wear body cameras, it is important to first look at the history and back ground of the topic. According to article of Journal of quantitative criminology, writers Ariel, Farrar, Sutherland, Body cameras have been given a new eye opener to people about the excessive use of force against their community members. Arial, Farrar, and Sutherland in the article state “The effect of police body warn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomize controlled trial” describe their observation as:
A police body camera is a video recording system that is used by law enforcers to record their interactions with the public and gather video evidence at crime scenes. Police body cameras are an essential change that the American public and law enforcement desperately need. Every year there are complaints of police officers allegedly using their power and weapons in ways that may or may not have followed correct police procedures. There are also cases where the officers’ reports differ from the suspect’s account of what really happened. Having a police body camera will help determine the truth because of the video evidence.
One of the many drawbacks that come with using body cameras is due to the fact that there is a locus of control. This may pose a problem because there is an underlying question of who can control the cameras. There can be many videos of incidents that are not captured because an officer decided to turn off their camera. Officers have the ability to turn them off or on which causes the problem of each officer not releasing them. Many departments across the country does not even allow individuals to access the footage that is recorded and with the laws that are in place for many department to deny access to the footage that they have. Due to each officer having to release the footage that they capture, they are allowed to review the footage that they record before they make a statement (Harvard Law Review). This is one of the biggest drawbacks because controlling the video footage is important in not only courts but to ensure the minds of
To begin, cameras will not only help the police when accused of police brutality, but they will be able to help victims who also suffer from it. At times, it is difficult to prove that an officer has used excessive force. In fact, the footage will be available to help a case in court. After a police station did a trial with the cameras, they found that shifts without cameras experienced twice as many “use-of-force" incidents as the shift using cameras. For example, during the study, there was an 88% reduction in complaints against officers when wearing the cameras.